SwansonsTache
incontinent sexual deviant & German sausage lover
By charging in alone against a 6000 man army after his brother had already died. Clever man.
This. Jon snow literally knows nothing and is far too emotional to be a leader of men.
By charging in alone against a 6000 man army after his brother had already died. Clever man.
Agreed. Note the Blackfish approach in the previous episode (forget the unanticipated outcome). That is the approach of a so called "legendary commander" and the show is linking these 2 incidents together to show us that Jon is a great guy but not a battle commander.This. Jon snow literally knows nothing and is far too emotional to be a leader of men.
By charging in alone against a 6000 man army after his brother had already died. Clever man.
1. Please, this is the moment where the show demonstrated Sansa's development as a character. Influence by the trauma she's endured so far and moulded by Littlefinger. She is now a calculating and manipulative player and active participant in the game of thrones (though I think she'd just settle for Winterfell). She beat/shit all over Ramsey and if it wasn't for her Jon would have lost and died, Sansa would have been pursued, captured and eventually killed. Also, all the direwolves names are symbolic:
Greywind (A strong but brief force of nature) - Rob Starks life
Summer - Summer being killed represents Winter destroying summer
Shaggydog - A narrative that builds up to a pointless conclusion i.e. a "shaggydog story" describes the life of Rickon.
Ghost - Jon has been a ghost all his life and could technically be a ghost as he's been brought back from the dead.
Nymeria (Arya's direwolf) is a book character and I understand book details are forbidden so I'll leave that one out.
Lady - The lady side of Sansa was killed, foreshadowing Sansas transformation from a helpless and naïve Lady into a political mastermind. Now completed
2. A handful of archers almost took down Wun Wun. You really think Thousands of archers and spearmen on the walls of Winterfell couldn't bring him down?
Jon is the character that everyone wants to get behind because his approach is the most glorious and "honourable" if that word can be used in any context. But the whole idea of GoT (the books and the show) is that being a good warrior and honourable doesn't win you wars.
Nobody has said it was a clever thing to do though. Not every leader or person on the show has to be some smart tactician that shows no emotion or ever give a shit about the people they care about. That scene and battle summed up who Jon Snow is and I fecking love it to be perfectly honest.
Good post and I like the Direwolves comparison to their owner.
I think people are spending waaaay too much time to find flaws in that episode. It was nothing like the previous one where the obvious flaws stuck out (and was rightfully bashed as one of the worst eps of the season if not series). Some moments were laughable but the one positive was that it progressed some stories which badly needed it (ie Arya).
Also the scene with Tormund and Davos saying hes not a king and they dont need a king. JS is a flawed character who wasnt built for leading but has been thrust into it due to circumstances. Hes a warrior who people will follow though.Nobody has said it was a clever thing to do though. Not every leader or person on the show has to be some smart tactician that shows no emotion or ever give a shit about the people they care about. That scene and battle summed up who Jon Snow is and I fecking love it to be perfectly honest.
It's Always Sunny in Westeros...
Hopefully, whilst Littlefinger is basking in the glory of victory, planning his ascension, Sansa tells him he is far too manipulative and dangerous to be around, as the poisoned chalice falls from his hand while he chokes.
Good post and I like the Direwolves comparison to their owner.
I think people are spending waaaay too much time to find flaws in that episode. It was nothing like the previous one where the obvious flaws stuck out (and was rightfully bashed as one of the worst eps of the season if not series). Some moments were laughable but the one positive was that it progressed some stories which badly needed it (ie Arya).
Flaws can be there and sometimes they are just made purely by assumption and guesswork as to a backstory. Rickon is 8 years old locked up in a dungeon for months and has just seen his first friendly face and family member for god knows how long. It's not unrealistic to assume he'd just run straight for Jon.There are always flaws in any show. They are fun to pick out but they didn't in anyway make me enjoy the episode less.
Rickon shouldn't have ran in a straight line though.
Rickon shouldn't have ran in a straight line though.
Flaws can be there and sometimes they are just made purely by assumption and guesswork as to a backstory. Rickon is 8 years old locked up in a dungeon for months and has just seen his first friendly face and family member for god knows how long. It's not unrealistic to assume he'd just run straight for Jon.
Also, even if he did zig zag Ramsey would have just got a volley of arrows from his men to bring him down. There was no way Ramsey would ever lt Rickon live.
The show has been going for 6 years. There is no way he was 2 when the show started. I take it that the events have happened over many years not just a few months. It would take years to ride back and forth across a continent the way they have over the duration of the series.Flaws can be there and sometimes they are just made purely by assumption and guesswork as to a backstory. Rickon is 8 years old locked up in a dungeon for months and has just seen his first friendly face and family member for god knows how long. It's not unrealistic to assume he'd just run straight for Jon.
Also, even if he did zig zag Ramsey would have just got a volley of arrows from his men to bring him down. There was no way Ramsey would ever lt Rickon live.
Thought the same thing. Also Ramsey should have killed Jon Snow first and then bothered with Rickon
Thought the same thing. Also Ramsey should have killed Jon Snow first and then bothered with Rickon
The show has been going for 6 years. There is no way he was 2 when the show started. I take it that the events have happened over many years not just a few months. It would take years to ride back and forth across a continent the way they have over the duration of the series.
Agreed, her sheer contempt for the entire world is impressive.
It's not when it started as much as how long it's been running. Everybody in the show is 6 years older than they were when the show started. Where did you get the idea he is 8 from? If it's the books you are posting it in the wrong thread.How does it matter when the show started in television?
It's not when it started as much as how long it's been running. Everybody in the show is 6 years older than they were when the show started. Where did you get the idea he is 8 from? If it's the books you are posting it in the wrong thread.
How long has gone in the show then? It's not 10 minutes after King Robert turned up in Winterfell.I didn't even post that. Everybody isn't 6 year older in the show because it started 6 years back. . In real life the are.
How long has gone in the show then? It's not 10 minutes after King Robert turned up in Winterfell.
As I have said in my post people have rode horses backwards and forwards across continents you don't do that in 10 minutes, that takes years.
Again where did you get fact that Ricon is 8 from? His age hasn't come up in the show in the last couple of years. Sounds seriously like book knowledge to me.
Okay sorry I got my posters crossed. I thought that you were the person I was responding to. I didn't check back in my posts to see it wasn't.Which part of 'I didn't even post that' did you not get? Ask whoever mentioned he is 8 years old. I dunno how long it has gone in the show but it certainly makes zero sense that Ricon was 2 years old when the show started assuming he is 8 years old now just because the TV show is 6 years old.
Okay sorry I got my posters crossed. I thought that you were the person I was responding to. I didn't check back in my posts to see it wasn't.
Now as for why I am taking it that 6 years has passed in the show. We have a program that started with young actors who have grown up over the coarse of the show. We have seen children turn into young adults. The only way this makes sense is if the character has aged at the same rate or a similar rate as the actor. If Bran, Ricon, Arya and the rest are only supposed to be a few months older than when the show started then it has lost all attempt at plausibility.
BTW how much time do you think has past in the show? Why is thinking 6 years so unreasonable?
Right, because there's no way someone could have ... told her that?Did anyone notice that at the end of the episode when sansa was getting ready to make dog food out of Ramsey she reminds him that he said he didn't feed his hounds for 7 days, but when he said that she'd already went off on the horse when the writers can make errors like that is it any wonder they don't care about the unrealistic way they make characters such as LF go from one place to another.
Well she did not claim she heard him say it did she?Did anyone notice that at the end of the episode when sansa was getting ready to make dog food out of Ramsey she reminds him that he said he didn't feed his hounds for 7 days, but when he said that she'd already went off on the horse when the writers can make errors like that is it any wonder they don't care about the unrealistic way they make characters such as LF go from one place to another.
Edmure said the red wedding was 2 years ago at Riverun. I'd make that a max 3 years since the beginning (probably closer to 2) and Rickon was 6 at the beginning of the show. For clarity I know we get carried away but actor Art Parkinson is not actually Rickon StarkThe show has been going for 6 years. There is no way he was 2 when the show started. I take it that the events have happened over many years not just a few months. It would take years to ride back and forth across a continent the way they have over the duration of the series.
Did anyone notice that at the end of the episode when sansa was getting ready to make dog food out of Ramsey she reminds him that he said he didn't feed his hounds for 7 days, but when he said that she'd already went off on the horse when the writers can make errors like that is it any wonder they don't care about the unrealistic way they make characters such as LF go from one place to another.
.Right, because there's no way someone could have ... told her that?
Or even before the battle.So you don't think Jon or anyone else could have told her that after the battle? Sorry if that spoilt the show for you.
Yeah of course, i get that. But its the night before a battle and I doubt that Ramsey's antagonistic threats would have been the number one talking point that night. But yeah, someone could have told her.Right, because there's no way someone could have ... told her that?
Who said it would be the number one talking point.Yeah of course, i get that. But its the night before a battle and I doubt that Ramsey's antagonistic threats would have been the number one talking point that night. But yeah, someone could have told her.
I agree that 4-6 would be reasonable.Alright mate. I don't think it's unreasonable. I just found the conviction that it must be the same as the years passed since the first season strange. Frankly, I have no clue. I can't recollect references to timelines in the show that exactly point these out. 4-6 would be my guess.
Ok. Jesus lads I was just trying to show off that I found a minor plot hole. I'll shut up now.So you don't think Jon or anyone else could have told her that after the battle? Sorry if that spoilt the show for you.