Theafonis
In love with @Eboue
Kind of hoping Cersei doesn't die, she's like the only true villian left. Other than those crazy Boltons. The religious police thing will probably back fire on her though.
White Walkers.Kind of hoping Cersei doesn't die, she's like the only true villian left. Other than those crazy Boltons.
I didn't say that he can't post here. I was suggesting that he might be happier not watching and talking about something that he obviously doesn't like. Seems logical to me.
You make the same mistake as most of Westeros, ignoring the real "villian".Kind of hoping Cersei doesn't die, she's like the only true villian left. Other than those crazy Boltons.
We had that in the Lost thread with Spoony. Best to just ignore.I didn't say that he can't post here. I was suggesting that he might be happier not watching and talking about something that he obviously doesn't like. Seems logical to me.
Thanks, and @Andy_Cole.
Ok. So that story Baelish was telling Sansa...Raygar Targaryan threw his flowers at her because he fancied her, and even though she was betrothed to Robert B, or married, he raped and killed her. This led to Ned and Robert forming an alliance and killing the Mad King? Is that correct?
Silver hair is a Targaryen trait, but usually Targaryen's marry within their own house, and so the features remain the same. In this case it is a Stark and a Targaryen, so it's not the same as others.
This is possibly the only case where a Targaryen had a child with someone outside the house.
Yeah it's been mentioned plenty of times.Did you learn all this by watching the show?
In season 2, Cersei and Tyrion go over this in detail, for example.
Yeah I'm not sure stuff like that has been mentioned in the show, though I guess it makes a little sense.
In season 2, Cersei and Tyrion go over this in detail, for example.
Maybe he likes that aspect?
I find fanboys telling others what they can and can't do is worse than any negativity. I had it in TWD thread before. Not everyone is so rosey about everything and people see things differently. This is a message board and all opinions and view types should be welcome and free to say what they like, there's always the option of ignoring views you don't like.
Anyway I'm liking Season 5, the build up is quite clear and though individual episodes might be a little more boring than before, the character arc building is better for me.
In season 2, Cersei and Tyrion go over this in detail, for example.
Not really. Both share similarities in that they try to have real world characters and plots in a "fantasy" setting, and both are incredibly overrated.The Walking Dead is all over the place though, anyone can see that. Comparing GoT to TWD is disingenuous.
As for Jon's parentage, what everyone is discussing is a big book theory, one that makes the most sense, but how one could extrapolate that from the show I'll never know.
The Walking Dead is all over the place though, anyone can see that. Comparing GoT to TWD is disingenuous.
As for Jon's parentage, what everyone is discussing is a big book theory, one that makes the most sense, but how one could extrapolate that from the show I'll never know.
Not really. Both share similarities in that they try to have real world characters and plots in a "fantasy" setting, and both are incredibly overrated.
GoT is still far better than TWD though, obviously.
The Walking Dead is all over the place though, anyone can see that. Comparing GoT to TWD is disingenuous.
As for Jon's parentage, what everyone is discussing is a big book theory, one that makes the most sense, but how one could extrapolate that from the show I'll never know.
The Wire already did that better than either of 'em anyway. "Baltimore", heh, amirite?They tell human stories in a fantasy world, it's a crossover hit!
I prefer walking dead to GOT, and get very insulted when everyone slags my favourite show that threadThe Walking Dead is all over the place though, anyone can see that. Comparing GoT to TWD is disingenuous.
As for Jon's parentage, what everyone is discussing is a big book theory, one that makes the most sense, but how one could extrapolate that from the show I'll never know.
The Wire already did that better than either of 'em anyway. "Baltimore", heh, amirite?
Ben, Parks & Recs etc, I got it you dick.Bodymore you mean. Shame on you for missing my reference though.
Which is my gripe with that "theory" about Jon Snow. How you could deduce that from what we have seen and heard so far. He's thrown two names into the mix which have been mentioned briefly once! I had to google their names because they didn't even ring any bells and saw all sorts of stuff I shouldn't. Basically, from the last episode lots of book readers with far more information than us have started to post theories and there's no place for them in this thread IMO.
Ben, Parks & Recs etc, I got it you dick.
Not really. Both share similarities in that they try to have real world characters and plots in a "fantasy" setting, and both are incredibly overrated.
GoT is still far better than TWD though, obviously.
Lost is better than both shows dammitYOUR FACE IS OVERRATED.
@Redlambs I wasn't trying to be clever, I was just referring to the criticisms of TWD. It's the most inconsistent show since Lost.
Maybe he likes that aspect?
I find fanboys telling others what they can and can't do is worse than any negativity. I had it in TWD thread before. Not everyone is so rosey about everything and people see things differently. This is a message board and all opinions and view types should be welcome and free to say what they like, there's always the option of ignoring views you don't like.
Anyway I'm liking Season 5, the build up is quite clear and though individual episodes might be a little more boring than before, the character arc building is better for me.
I don't know about Lambs but I've never touched the books.Which is my gripe with that "theory" about Jon Snow. How you could deduce that from what we have seen and heard so far. He's thrown two names into the mix which have been mentioned briefly once! I had to google their names because they didn't even ring any bells and saw all sorts of stuff I shouldn't. Basically, from the last episode lots of book readers with far more information than us have started to post theories and there's no place for them in this thread IMO.
I don't think I am a fanboy. I wasn't even looking forward to the new season but I have to admit that I am intrigued by events now.
The show is daft, it has dragons and magic! Take it for what it is - entertainment. That is how I look at it.
There is a difference between critique and sniping though. Anyways I will heed advice and ignore.
Which is my gripe with that "theory" about Jon Snow. How you could deduce that from what we have seen and heard so far. He's thrown two names into the mix which have been mentioned briefly once! I had to google their names because they didn't even ring any bells and saw all sorts of stuff I shouldn't. Basically, from the last episode lots of book readers with far more information than us have started to post theories and there's no place for them in this thread IMO.
You posted in book thread yesterdayI don't know about Lambs but I've never touched the books.
However, I have watched the show quite carefully, a few times over.
YOUR FACE IS OVERRATED.
@Redlambs I wasn't trying to be clever, I was just referring to the criticisms of TWD. It's the most inconsistent show since Lost.
I don't think I am a fanboy. I wasn't even looking forward to the new season but I have to admit that I am intrigued by events now.
The show is daft, it has dragons and magic! Take it for what it is - entertainment. That is how I look at it.
There is a difference between critique and sniping though. Anyways I will heed advice and ignore.
I don't know about Lambs but I've never touched the books.
However, I have watched the show quite carefully, a few times over.
Jon Snow Birth Speculation/theory...
Just had an interesting idea pop in my head. We know that Ned was an honourable man... what if Jon wasn't actually Neds child but his sister's Leannes? That would make Littlefingers chat to Sansa in the crypt mean something. So what if Jon Snow is in fact Leannes and Rhaegars son? Leanne fearing for her son's safety asks Ned to adopt him as his bastard knowing that Jon would then be safe in Winterfell. That also makes sense given how reluctant Ned was to talk about his mother and his out of character it was for him to have a bastard in the first place.
Rhaegar was Daenryis older brother and Leanne was Neds dead sister (the one Rob Barath went to war over).
@Pexbo who are the book readers?