Frenkie de Jong | The last muppeting lap

Frenkie to United?


  • Total voters
    2,033
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
I would have been optimistic but this is the same club that waited the entire summer of 2020 hoping Dortmund would lower the price for Sancho because of Covid.
 
I would have been optimistic but this is the same club that waited the entire summer of 2020 hoping Dortmund would lower the price for Sancho because of Covid.

And they reduced the fee drastically.
 
And they reduced the fee drastically.
A year later yes. That summer United panic signed Cavani and wasted money on Amad and Pellstri. Or in other words did not have a proper plan outside of Sancho so they wasted the summer
 
I would have been optimistic but this is the same club that waited the entire summer of 2020 hoping Dortmund would lower the price for Sancho because of Covid.
Seems like we succeeded in doing that, so what's your point?
 
No one is paying that you numpties.

I understand the budget but we should do this deal last.
No one's paying £68 million? I think that's a very reasonable price, utd should respect the valuation and put the offer on the table so they can move on to the next target.
 
A year later yes. That summer United panicked signed Cavani and wasted money on Amad and Pellstri. Or in other words did not have a proper plan outside of Sancho so they wasted the summer

Panicked signed?
 
We shouldn't be breaking the bank for him in these troubled times. I'm not even convinced he's the perfect fit for our midfield. There is a reason Barca would rather prioritise young Gavi, Pedri and a 34 year old Busquets over him.
 
We shouldn't be breaking the bank for him in these troubled times. I'm not even convinced he's the perfect fit for our midfield. There is a reason Barca would rather prioritise young Gavi, Pedri and a 34 year old Busquets over him.
Its only Busquets who they are prioritising over him. Question is though who replaces him when he eventually retires.
 
We shouldn't be breaking the bank for him in these troubled times. I'm not even convinced he's the perfect fit for our midfield. There is a reason Barca would rather prioritise young Gavi, Pedri and a 34 year old Busquets over him.
The manager seems to think he would and would like to build it around him so I'll take his word for it
 
No the price naturally lowered with reduced term on his contract by a year.
So? We didn't think he was worth the ridiculous asking price they put (wasn't it like €120m?), so what's wrong with not agreeing to pay that and wait a year or so?
 
Would be something if Citeh and them work out some sort of swap between him and Bernardo Silva..
 
Its only Busquets who they are prioritising over him. Question is though who replaces him when he eventually retires.
It's all 3 because De Jong is expected to play higher up the pitch, no? And yes, even with question marks over Busquet's replacement, Barca are happy to see him leave. He isn't worth breaking the bank for. The last time we did that we got Harry Maguire for 80M.
 
A year later yes. That summer United panic signed Cavani and wasted money on Amad and Pellstri. Or in other words did not have a proper plan outside of Sancho so they wasted the summer
“Wasted” money on Amad/Pellistri.
 
we are well aware that FDJ is the perfect signing for ETH but we can't keep pissing around and miss out on other objectives to build the squad when teams around us are bringing in quality players
 
No one's paying £68 million? I think that's a very reasonable price, utd should respect the valuation and put the offer on the table so they can move on to the next target.
The kind of posts I see every year that would have had us pay £60m for Varane, £110m for Sancho and £30m for Telles.
 
We hold all of the chips in this saga. de Jong is not an absolute must for us, we will have alternatives we can get. Barca need to sell him. I'm glad we're not rolling over for once.
 
We shouldn't be breaking the bank for him in these troubled times. I'm not even convinced he's the perfect fit for our midfield. There is a reason Barca would rather prioritise young Gavi, Pedri and a 34 year old Busquets over him.
The reason is because Frenkie isn't a typical Barca player. He likes moving with the ball and roaming around. That role is typically done by the most advanced of the 3 for Barca, which isn't what Frenkie de Jong is a natural at. Even still, he's been among their best players every season, but they've been a bit of a disaster so it's hard to perform at your best in that anyway (as we know too well). He's best playing deep and having license to move forward (like Scholes liked to do). Barca with Busquets have a stable pivot who doesn't move. Pedri is a generational talent as the #8. So you're left with putting Frenkie as the most advanced ... And it's just not how you get the best out of him.

For United's needs, he's just about the best possible signing we could make for our midfield (as one of the 2 that are needed). If there were 2 dream signings, it would've been Tchouameni and Frenkie.
 
So? We didn't think he was worth the ridiculous asking price they put (wasn't it like €120m?), so what's wrong with not agreeing to pay that and wait a year or so?
Nothing. The thing we did wrong was to waste the whole summer chasing the deal when the deadline set had already passed whilst neglecting the other holes in the squad we needed to fix
 
No one's paying £68 million? I think that's a very reasonable price, utd should respect the valuation and put the offer on the table so they can move on to the next target.

List the clubs that will pay it knowing the options available and the wages on top of that?

It’s a very big deal to want a buying club to do.
 
It's all 3 because De Jong is expected to play higher up the pitch, no? And yes, even with question marks over Busquet's replacement, Barca are happy to see him leave. He isn't worth breaking the bank for. The last time we did that we got Harry Maguire for 80M.
If Ten Hag thinks he is then he is worth it
 
“Wasted” money on Amad/Pellistri.
Yes wasted since we needed a RW and still do yet we used budget on projects who most likely wont play for the first team as regulars ever
 
The kind of posts I see every year that would have had us pay £60m for Varane, £110m for Sancho and £30m for Telles.
I was arguing that paying £20 million for Telles with a year left on his contract was bad value for money at the time, understanding a fair price for a player is key and £68 million for FDJ is great value given how important he would be for the team and Ten Hag's system. If Barca wasn't in the situation they're in they'd probably be asking for £80 million plus for him. It's a fair valuation and I can't see them going lower, maybe a few million tops. To satisfy the manager and fanbase, and have the freedom to move on to other targets just pay up, £68 million is spot on for a player of his calibre.
 
We shouldn't be breaking the bank for him in these troubled times. I'm not even convinced he's the perfect fit for our midfield. There is a reason Barca would rather prioritise young Gavi, Pedri and a 34 year old Busquets over him.

There certainly is a reason. Barca are in massive financial difficulty and both players are younger, on less wages and don't have United knocking on the door looking to buy them for a boatload of cash.

If we also had two young players of the calibre of Gavi and Pedri you might have a point but we don't.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.