In reality, I was wrong because I expected Le Pen to be 1st
Yeah me too, I expected those numbers but switched Le Pen and Macron.
In reality, I was wrong because I expected Le Pen to be 1st
We'll get new polls for the next round, won't we?If Le Pen pulls this off, is that the end of polling in the world?
I put a fiver on Macron to top the first round a month or two ago so I'm hopeful these semi-exits prove correctIn reality, I was wrong because I expected Le Pen to be 1st
Yeah me too, I expected those numbers but switched Le Pen and Macron.
Is Macron 'the French Margaret Thatcher'?
We were told a few months ago that all the polls won't be wrong.No poll has ever been off by 20%. So, why do we talk about this.
No that's Fillon
French Blair.What is Macron all about then?
Ye of little faith
He's the only 'centrist' of the pack.What is Macron all about then?
Please tell me he did the speech marks with his hands whilst saying itIt wasn't really big deal for me, foreigners seem to care a lot about who is first.
Edit: Fillon is "supporting" Macron.
We were told a few months ago that all the polls won't be wrong.
Please tell me he did the speech marks with his hands whilst saying it
What is Macron all about then?
If Le Pen pulls this off, is that the end of polling in the world?
It wasn't really big deal for me, foreigners seem to care a lot about who is first.
Edit: Fillon is "supporting" Macron.
No poll has ever been off by 20%. So, why do we talk about this.
It was 82% for Chirac in 2002, it will be nowhere as emphatic this time round. It's a sign of the times really, 2002 was a massive shock, this time round we'll only be relieved if Macron wins.Like in 2002, everybody against Le Pen.
History repeats itself.
French Blair.
He's the only 'centrist' of the pack.
A little bit left and a little bit right, and hopefully a breath of fresh air
Look up Sanders Michigan victory. Polls had him 21 points behind Clinton.
It was 82% for Chirac in 2002, it will be nowhere as emphatic this time round. It's a sign of the times really, 2002 was a massive shock, this time round we'll only be relieved if Macron wins.
http://edition.cnn.com/videos/politics/2016/11/12/pollster-eats-bug-after-trump-win-smerconish.cnnBullshit argument.
I'm so tired of hearing this.
They were well within margin of error and with a bullshit system like the US, it was always a possibility. It wasn't a huge one, but no one acted like it was impossible.
Bullshit argument.
I'm so tired of hearing this.
They were well within margin of error and with a bullshit system like the US, it was always a possibility. It wasn't a huge one, but no one acted like it was impossible.
The national polls in the US were pretty accurate. She won the popular vote by about 2% which is roughly what most polls indicated.
You do realise that guy who had to eat a bug had been correct for a huge number of years?So what? Seriously, do you understand how polling work in the slightest?
American polling wasn't wrong, the states results were will within the margin of error and on point apart for 2-3 states. Correct in this case is also when something is called to close to call, like Florida. Because of the retarded American system, few upsets, which were all well within the margin of error, swung the electoral college result around by a huge margin. People like Nate Silver clearly pointed out this was a possibility a few hours before the election.
So, instead of posting random links of bullshit, maybe try to actually understand the matter.
Exactly what I said. Huge populaces in countrywide elections are easy to poll, but the electoral college is way more difficult to predict.
You do realise that guy who had to eat a bug had been correct for a huge number of years?
Anyway, I get your point, but 20% polling errors are unheard of.
That's very true.Well no one claims polls are 100% correct. But in a popular vote system, they tend to be far more correct than in systems like GB or the US, where it comes down to states/counties.
Not that it affects your point but constituencies are far smaller than counties, for UK general elections. Only use 'counties' in the European Parliament elections.Well no one claims polls are 100% correct. But in a popular vote system, they tend to be far more correct than in systems like GB or the US, where it comes down to states/counties.
This is true.On the other hand, some 'pundits' were certain that Clinton would win, no?
On the other hand, some 'pundits' were certain that Clinton would win, no?
Not that it affects your point but constituencies are far smaller than counties, for UK general elections. Only use 'counties' in the European Parliament elections.