Bold move.
A smart move rather.Bold move.
Or Zidane/Moyes I guess.A smart move rather.
Best case Giggs is an instant hit. Worst case, giggs is fired and his club are looking for a new manager and hire one of these 19 managers
Half the fun in these experiments is purposely doing yourself in.Bold move.
True. Wonder what Giggs' favoured formation is? 442?Half the fun in these experiments is purposely doing yourself in.
Or his team hire Jardim and Jardim is eventually replaced by the chosen one.Or Zidane/Moyes I guess.
He can piss off. If there's an option to set board patience with managers I'd put mine at 20.Or his team hire Jardim and Jardim is eventually replaced by the chosen one.
Okay. So you're not going to post everyone's top five either? Wouldn't have to post who beat who, we'd work it out from the image or whatever.@Damien sorry but I won't keep track of who's 'beating' who in the PM drafting. Will be too much to keep track of, I'm directly editing the form when there's a duplicate entry and sending a PM to those concerned asking them to find a replacement. I can say when there is a coin toss though and people lose out because of that.
Okay. So you're not going to post everyone's top five either? Wouldn't have to post who beat who, we'd work it out from the image or whatever.
Of course I'll post everyones top 5. I'll post a screenshot of the form when it's done.Better post everyone's top 5, otherwise the next round will be filled nearly entirely with duplicates.
Some players are recurring again and again and again. Someone send me a PM with 3 players who were higher on others' lists.
NoIf these 3 pick players that others have picked up on replacement surely they take preference?
All three of them have been on since Macern said about sending him PMs though.Jesus that's harsh. The pool of players is going to be considerably smaller for them than everyone else though
How come? Their replacements swap their priority number as well. I think that's a fair way to do it.Jesus that's harsh. The pool of players is going to be considerably smaller for them than everyone else though
Oh nice, so the name I pmed you would take the position of the player who I missed out on in the top five order thing?How come? Their replacements swap their priority number as well. I think that's a fair way to do it.
The way I'm doing it is that if someone PMs me a player who is already higher on other peoples lists, they must find a replacement. The replacement takes over the number on their list as well. If their replacement is on someone elses list but the other guy has him lower on his list then he's the one who needs to replace him. It's equally fair for everyone regardless of when they send me their PMsJesus that's harsh. The pool of players is going to be considerably smaller for them than everyone else though
YesOh nice, so the name I pmed you would take the position of the player who I missed out on in the top five order thing?
Lots of stuff. Send me your 5 playersI was at the gym. Wtf is going on?
Sent.Lots of stuff. Send me your 5 players
Sounds like one of mine.Way more players picked by the same participants than I expected. There will even be a coin toss on a player I've never heard of before.
Surprisingly notSounds like one of mine.
Sorry but he's number one on multiple lists.Macern was mean to me in a PM
Instead of coin toss, whoever was supposed to pick 1st in that round can be handed the player. i.e. 6th and every even round from Spontaneous to mazhar and odd round in the other way is a fairer way, I thinkWay more players picked by the same participants than I expected. There will even be a coin toss on a player I've never heard of before.
I don't know if it's a good or bad sign that I haven't had to replace anybody.
Woohoo!Surprisingly not
Instead of coin toss, whoever was supposed to pick 1st in that round can be handed the player. i.e. 6th and every even round from Spontaneous to mazhar and odd round in the other way is a fairer way, I think