Fellaini

Status
Not open for further replies.
What, like Ando did last night? Or perhaps like Kagawa did at Dortmund? Also, our midfield didn't get bullied by Fellaini last season... our defence (where we had to play a midfielder out of position) got bullied by Fellaini. That's the issue that many, including myself, have. He looks effective, if crude, playing up top. He looks like a oil tanker / walking red card in midfield.

No he's a pretty decent midfielder as it goes. Breaks play up and can pass the ball quickly and accurately under pressure. Also has an eye for goal and a bit of skill/strength in tight situations....and our midfield has been bullied by him, regularly.

Kagawa hasn't played in central midfield for United and Anderson's been there since 2008 and hasn't produced reliably over the course of a season. Scholes has become too old and now retired. We need someone else who can take the incisive passing burden from Carrick. Well, we don't need, but it would be quite helpful. Fellaini would at least solve the other half of the "what happens when Carrick gets injured" issue, though.
 
We can do better. If Fellaini comes he will be another Anderson who will fail to shine and be on large wages and be hard to offload.
 
We can do better. If Fellaini comes he will be another Anderson who will fail to shine and be on large wages and be hard to offload.
What? ??

you base this on what? He's already proven himself an excellent Premier league player. He may be no fabregas but he is better than most Premier league midfielders. Have people forgotten how much of a pain he was for the top sides last year? We had to specifically put jones or in midfield to mark him at home. Something we only did otherwise for Rooney and Bale.
He's a top class midfielder, only foolish can't see that.

EDIT. On re reading your post I think I may have fallen for a wind up..
 
No he's a pretty decent midfielder as it goes. Breaks play up and can pass the ball quickly and accurately under pressure. Also has an eye for goal and a bit of skill/strength in tight situations....and our midfield has been bullied by him, regularly.

Kagawa hasn't played in central midfield for United and Anderson's been there since 2008 and hasn't produced reliably over the course of a season. Scholes has become too old and now retired. We need someone else who can take the incisive passing burden from Carrick. Well, we don't need, but it would be quite helpful. Fellaini would at least solve the other half of the "what happens when Carrick gets injured" issue, though.
I'll definitely agree with this aspect of the signing in that he would remove the worry about not having a backup. I just believe that there are better signings possible in terms of a backup for Carrick and I don't believe he'll add anything going forward from a central midfield position. If we sign him than I'll give him the benefit of the doubt, obviously, but I'll watch through my hands in Europe as I believe he'll be sent off very quickly.
 
Just sign the fecker. If carrick gets injured we're fecked. With him, we have someone who could stand in or play beside carrick to release our more creative players.

We could really use two quality midfielders.
 
No he's a pretty decent midfielder as it goes. Breaks play up and can pass the ball quickly and accurately under pressure. Also has an eye for goal and a bit of skill/strength in tight situations....and our midfield has been bullied by him, regularly.

Kagawa hasn't played in central midfield for United and Anderson's been there since 2008 and hasn't produced reliably over the course of a season. Scholes has become too old and now retired. We need someone else who can take the incisive passing burden from Carrick. Well, we don't need, but it would be quite helpful. Fellaini would at least solve the other half of the "what happens when Carrick gets injured" issue, though.

I agree - Id be happy with his signing and think we need that type of midfielder, dont understand all the negativity.

And we do have Cleverley for midfield passing, he is underrated by many as well.

Anyone who is expecting 2 midfield signings is likely to be disappointed, be happy with one!
 
You don't have to dominate possession, though. That's just one way, not the only way. Bayern humiliated Barcelona over two legs last season - and they certainly didn't dominate possession. Nor have we regularly under Fergie. You don't need to protect the ball at all times to control a football match. Our style has traditionally been mainly about open play, often wing play, not about suffocating the opponent through possession. I hope Moyes continues that tradition - in which case we don't need a passing machine alongside Carrick.

I agree with The Nev above. Bolstering up the middle somewhat, allowing both Carrick to perhaps be a little more adventurous - and those in front to work their magic. That's what we should aim for in my opinion.

That doesn't mean I would be against getting in someone like Fabregas: The thing is the balance. A player like him, who has such an ability on the ball and such mobility, combined with the positional awareness of a born midfielder, not least - would also make us tighter, of course. But it looks like that deal won't go through, so we need to look elsewhere.


Many teams play a possession based game, and it's boring, after all very few teams have Messi, Xavi and Iniesta. I prefer teams that attack relentlessly; It's pleasing to watch when a team doesn't hold possession for the sake of it, and pushes the ball forward and launch waves of attacks. Either is fine, as long your team is good at it.

I guess people who prefer football where the team keeps possession and opens opposition subtly and also prefer wine over bourbon. Whatever gets you drunk.
 
Will be just like the Ashley Young signing.

Brushed over if we sign another better midfielder though.
 
Manchester United open talks with Everton over £23.5m Maroune Fellaini
Manchester United have opened negotiations with Everton over a deal for Marouane Fellaini, as David Moyes fears that his top midfield target, Cesc Fábregas of Barcelona, could prove out of reach.
Moyes, who has so far added only the young Uruguayan full-back Guillermo Varela to his squad before his debut season at Old Trafford, worked with Fellaini at Everton, having signed him for £15m from Standard Liege in 2008.
Fellaini is understood to have offers from elsewhere in the Premier League but the 25-year-old would relish the opportunity to join United and continue his working relationship with Moyes. United are in pole position for his signature and they are aware of the £23.5m buy-out clause in his contract, which expires on 15 August. Thereafter, Fellaini's price would be at the mercy of the market.
United's need for reinforcement in midfield has been intensified by Paul Scholes's retirement at the end of last season and Moyes has pushed to take Fábregas, the former Arsenal captain, seeing two bids turned down by Barcelona. Moyes has also been linked with a move for Luka Modric of Real Madrid although that, too, has been fraught with complications.
Arsène Wenger, the Arsenal manager, has said for the past three weeks that his information was that Fábregas would stay at Camp Nou for at least another season. Despite the acrimony of Fábregas's departure from Arsenal, Wenger has retained a good relationship with him while the player's agent is the son of David Dein, Wenger's closest contact in the game. In this summer of the contractual transfer clause, Arsenal have one that effectively entitles them to first refusal on Fábregas. Wenger's information would appear to be well-sourced.
Fellaini is a different type of midfielder, with reservations over his passing ability and disciplinary record. But he has skill, tremendous presence and threat, as evidenced by his 12 goals for Everton last season.
 
Fellaini plus a strong experienced midfielder and we are set.
 
I've always said that I'd be happy with the Fellaini signing once it was alongside another midfielder of quality, and I think a lot agreed. Unfortunately, it doesn't look like it will.
 
Why? There are around 25 days of the window still to go.

Don't see Fabregas happening, in fact I reckon he'll put that to bed tomorrow at his press conference. As for Modric, unless Madrid bring in another midfielder I see him remaining another season. After them two, who's available that would be a genuine improvement on our current midfield?
 
Don't see Fabregas happening, in fact I reckon he'll put that to bed tomorrow at his press conference. As for Modric, unless Madrid bring in another midfielder I see him remaining another season. After them two, who's available that would be a genuine improvement on our current midfield?


Not sure, Moyes should be judged at the end of the window though.
 
Good aerial ability, Physical presence and ball winner and can score a few as well.What else do you need.
 
For £24 million?


I agree he'd be overpriced. I agree generally with the consensus that he's not what you need and would be quite a negative signing.

But short-term at least, he would improve you, and if you can't get your top target at the moment, then maybe he's the next best thing.
 
Just want to get this done really, I think he would be a good signing and would easily improve our central midfield.
 
I agree he'd be overpriced. I agree generally with the consensus that he's not what you need and would be quite a negative signing.

But short-term at least, he would improve you, and if you can't get your top target at the moment, then maybe he's the next best thing.


I would be fine with Fellaini as a 10-15 mil squad-type player. But 24 million no chance.
 
He's better than a peak Fletcher too, who some people claimed was the best midfielder in the league......workhorses!
 
It's not his fault there's nobody available anyway. In fact, in Fellaini, he's probably going to sign the only feasible transfer who'd be an improvement.


Fabregas and Modric aren't the only quality midfielders in the world.

Up to Moyes to identify someone suitable, that's what he gets paid for.
 
I would be fine with Fellaini as a 10-15 mil squad-type player. But 24 million no chance.

Considering Everton paid £15m for him, there's really very little chance of us getting him for less than £20m.

I still don't think you'll actually sign him. The press have just decided you are with no actual info coming from the club.

I actually concur with this.
 
Is Fellaini better than Giggs, Cleverley and Anderson? Yes.

If you boil it down to an analysis that simple, he's a good signing.
I don't think people would disagree with you. He is better than any of our midfielders bar carrick. He's better than most midfielders in EPL. The problem is after a summer we have been after Fabregas and Thiago it just feels like we are settling and we COULD/SHOULD have done better. He will improve us...just not AS much as people want.

Interesting thought though. Can we list (and try be honest) better midfielders (CM's) than Fellaini at the moment:

Carrick (in his 'carrick role').
Toure
Wilshere
Gerrard (maybe..but not sure about that)


Any more? Cant have likes of Fernandinho as we just dont know yet (although he will be good). Arteta, Lampard, Sandro, Dembele, Ramires (as a CM), Barry, Milner...all I would prefer Fellaini in my team.
 
Fellaini and another central midfielder of some sort (more of a prospect perhaps?) would be some decent business in my opinion. I think we should be looking to do more then just Fellaini at any rate... especially when you consider we'd probably lose him for at least 6 or 7 games due to suspensions.

However, I still think there is something in the Fabregas move, and will do so until Fabregas himself announces he doesn't want to leave Barca (and since he hasn't done so in the past week or two, I imagine he wouldn't mind leaving...)
 
I don't think people would disagree with you. He is better than any of our midfielders bar carrick. He's better than most midfielders in EPL. The problem is after a summer we have been after Fabregas and Thiago it just feels like we are settling and we COULD/SHOULD have done better. He will improve us...just not AS much as people want.

Interesting thought though. Can we list (and try be honest) better midfielders (CM's) than Fellaini at the moment:

Carrick (in his 'carrick role').
Toure
Wilshere
Gerrard (maybe..but not sure about that)


Any more? Cant have likes of Fernandinho as we just dont know yet (although he will be good). Arteta, Lampard, Sandro, Dembele, Ramires (as a CM), Barry, Milner...all I would prefer Fellaini in my team.

Arteta is a better footballer I would say (and he pretty much always does well for Arsenal - even when the rest of the side are falling apart.), but his age means I'd rather have Fellaini.
 
I don't think people would disagree with you. He is better than any of our midfielders bar carrick. He's better than most midfielders in EPL. The problem is after a summer we have been after Fabregas and Thiago it just feels like we are settling and we COULD/SHOULD have done better. He will improve us...just not AS much as people want.

Interesting thought though. Can we list (and try be honest) better midfielders (CM's) than Fellaini at the moment:

Carrick (in his 'carrick role').
Toure
Wilshere
Gerrard (maybe..but not sure about that)


Any more? Cant have likes of Fernandinho as we just dont know yet (although he will be good). Arteta, Lampard, Sandro, Dembele, Ramires (as a CM), Barry, Milner...all I would prefer Fellaini in my team.

I think that says more about the quality of midfielders in the PL than anything. Think of how many you could name who are better than him in La Liga or the Bundesliga.
 
I think that says more about the quality of midfielders in the PL than anything. Think of how many you could name who are better than him in La Liga or the Bundesliga.
Thats true, but not the point i was making. Could be worse!
 
Yes he's worth 24 million. The same people probably cried when we paid all that money for RVP.. He's 25, he's better then he's made to sound and he's versatile. If we're willing to pay the money for Ronaldo and Fabregas, this won't have any effect on that. We're talking about a player who will continue to improve. The price is irrelevant because if he's part of a team that helps us win a trophy that generates us money, then who cares? Lots of people moaned at £30 million for Rooney....he justified it after a game because it was obviously what we had. People saw the hat trick and thought great!. There's a whole list of instances where people have been proven wrong. There are very few certainties but he would improve the squad and yes he is worth it. The main point is he's a midfielder and we're in dire need whether it be this guy or anyone. We just need to plug the gaps.
 
I don't think people would disagree with you. He is better than any of our midfielders bar carrick. He's better than most midfielders in EPL. The problem is after a summer we have been after Fabregas and Thiago it just feels like we are settling and we COULD/SHOULD have done better. He will improve us...just not AS much as people want.

Interesting thought though. Can we list (and try be honest) better midfielders (CM's) than Fellaini at the moment:

Carrick (in his 'carrick role').
Toure
Wilshere
Gerrard (maybe..but not sure about that)


Any more? Cant have likes of Fernandinho as we just dont know yet (although he will be good). Arteta, Lampard, Sandro, Dembele, Ramires (as a CM), Barry, Milner...all I would prefer Fellaini in my team.


Don't disagree with much of that post.

The issue, as you say, is the idea you're settling for a player who is inferior to one you could have got. If you actually wanted him, you'd have gone in there and got him early on when the release clause was there.

That said, this is all based on the premise that Moyes does want him - something which isn't yet clear.
 
I think that says more about the quality of midfielders in the PL than anything. Think of how many you could name who are better than him in La Liga or the Bundesliga.

There's a quite a few quality midfielders in Italy at the moment too I'd say.
 
Yes he's worth 24 million. The same people probably cried when we paid all that money for RVP.. He's 25, he's better then he's made to sound and he's versatile. If we're willing to pay the money for Ronaldo and Fabregas, this won't have any effect on that. We're talking about a player who will continue to improve. The price is irrelevant because if he's part of a team that helps us win a trophy that generates us money, then who cares? Lots of people moaned at £30 million for Rooney....he justified it after a season because it was obviously what we had. There's a whole list of instances where people have been proven wrong. There are very few certainties but he would improve the squad and yes he is worth it.

Comparing the fees of the best striker in the world at the time to a decent/good (depending on how you look at it) midfielder, not sure that's the best approach to take here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.