He reminds me of Drunken Duncan too - a shit, dirty player who should be nowhere near a top club.I like him lots. He reminds me of Duncan Ferguson, except for position.
He reminds me of Drunken Duncan too - a shit, dirty player who should be nowhere near a top club.
He reminds me of Drunken Duncan too - a shit, dirty player who should be nowhere near a top club.
because he didn't like getting elbowed in the face every 2 minutes - have you seen the state of Tony's conk?You are saying Duncan Ferguson was shit? Really lol why did Tony Adams rate him as the player he most disliked playing against?
We'll rehabilitate him and make him a decent member of society (while he gets 25 goals a season).
Fabregas would be a sensational signing but, I'd be almost as pleased with getting Fellaini. I'd like him for just his size/bit of dirty side alone because it's something we could use in the middle of the park in some games but, I think he has also shown to me he has a good technical side - which might become more apparent when surrounded with better technical players - which is what could make him a regular for us.
looks like Tone had enough whacks for one day so he gave him a free run. Martin doesn't look amused...Goal 22 (3.43) against Arsenal. Love it, I remember it well. What a leap.
Loads of posters including me have wanted fellaini for past two years.
Loads of posters including me have wanted fellaini for past two years.
It would be hilarious to end up with Felliani after seeking creative and technical players like Fab and Thiago.
looks like Tone had enough whacks for one day so he gave him a free run. Martin doesn't look amused...
Only the eejits.
I'm always wary of youtube compilations you could Kilbane look good in one! No doubt he is a useful player I'm not denying that and he's very effective in the role he's used in for Everton. But I just don't see him as a Manchester United player, esp not as a centre midfielder. Could be proved wrong yet though.
I'm sure we can all see the value of buying him for the games against your Stokes and Boltons, but you have to ask if that's enough to lash 20m out for.
I'm relieved that Moyes seems to be trying to sign better midfielders, even if he does revert to having to sign Fellaini from the beginning and in the end.
See this is complete tosh. If he was only useful in games against Stoke or Bolton then how in Gods green earth did he destroy us? Give your head a wobble before spewing such complete bile.
Not by playing in central midfield, that's for sure. It was his aerial threat and his ability to bring down long balls launched in his direction that we couldn't cope with but those qualities aren't very useful in the deeper positions in midfield.
The point was that if he was a good enough footballer to completely destroy us then he's a much better footballer than someone who will only be useful against "stoke and bolton" which is what I was replying to.
Still, doing well against us doesn't guarantee anything. David Bentley once scored a hat-trick against us, Lennon has a habit of bullying Evra year after year and I remember when we couldn't handle Duncan Ferguson at Goodison Park. I could go on.
And it's an important distinction to make that he used his aerial ability and physical strength to cause serious problems to us. Many people who do not rate him say that these are his greatest assets (well, and his chest control) which is why he showed his best form for Everton when playing behind the main striker, as opposed to his supposedly preferred CM position. While it's a bit of an exaggeration to say that he'd only be useful against the physically aggressive teams there's little doubt that it's against these he would be the most useful. I don't think that's worth 20m+.
Not by playing in central midfield, that's for sure. It was his aerial threat and his ability to bring down long balls launched in his direction that we couldn't cope with but those qualities aren't very useful in the deeper positions in midfield.
You need Fabregas but thank feck you're not getting him