For feck's sake you could make a video of me and I'd look like Messi mk II. If you watch Fellaini over 90 mins through the season you'll see he's not a top 4 CM (or AM or that matter).
Fellaini
- Thread starter Bilbo
- Start date
- Status
It's a career highlights video. You could make one for Tiote that would have the same effect.
It's only this season isn't it?
I think a lot of people underrate Fellaini because he is so tall and often looks wooden and clumsy on the ball but it's undeniable that his physical presence is quite remarkable.
Someone also posted statistics here a while back which clearly showed that he was defensively on a level with the best DMs in the league and the fact that he got used farther up front this season also shows that there is more to his game than just physical presence.
He might not be the most elegant player but he sure as hell is an effective player and would add another option to our squad that could make games against very physical sides for us a tad more easy.
Someone also posted statistics here a while back which clearly showed that he was defensively on a level with the best DMs in the league and the fact that he got used farther up front this season also shows that there is more to his game than just physical presence.
He might not be the most elegant player but he sure as hell is an effective player and would add another option to our squad that could make games against very physical sides for us a tad more easy.
You want to pay top whack for an oaf so that you can battle Stoke a bit better?
Christ, there is no need to be so pedantic. Especially with the tripe you've come out with in this thread.
He clearly meant "He'd bring us something we don't have and currently need"
Unless Everton have had the same kit for 5 years it's from one season. Lots of assists, passes that set off attacking moves, some good defensive work and examples of his physical prowess. It's not like I'm basing my opinion on him off videos, everytime I've watched Everton he has been fantastic and even when below par he still influences games.
We need at least two midfielders anyway, if he was one of them I wouldn't be disappointed at all - my only worry would be if we played him at CF.
Exactly. If we only brought him I'd be abit worried. Him and someone else would be perfect for me.
Agreed
But I doubt either of you have watched him for more than 90 minutes. That 90 minutes being against Us and Arsenal.
Messi? Lets not get carried away. Maybe if we drop the 'I'.
Alright Ray Parlour mk VII.
Oo-er.
In which case it's a nothing statement, since the pages and pages of debate before his comment have all been about whether 'it' is something we need or not. I was just pointing out that what he actually wrote isn't an argument for buying someone.
Try not to take it all so personally.
Not sure if you're referring to me here, but if you are I'm afraid you're wrong. I'm an arts student - all I do is watch football.
Also, do you really have to go there? Pulling out the 'you've probably barely watched him anyway' card works better when you haven't just made a judgement on a player based solely on a YouTube highlight reel.
Completely agree, he's a battering ram who throws his elbows around more than Gabby Heinze. We do not want to be a team that reverts to lumping it onto his afro if we're slightly struggling for penetration.
Oo-er.
In which case it's a nothing statement, since the pages and pages of debate before his comment have all been about whether 'it' is something we need or not. I was just pointing out that what he actually wrote isn't an argument for buying someone.
Try not to take it all so personally.
Not sure if you're referring to me here, but if you are I'm afraid you're wrong. I'm an arts student - all I do is watch football.
Also, do you really have to go there? Pulling out the 'you've probably barely watched him anyway' card works better when you haven't just made a judgement on a player based solely on a YouTube highlight reel.
In a post literally just above I said I'm not just basing it off that. I've already been in this thread advocating us signing him from before Moyes was coming. I was referring to Pete and L8(something like that)
At least you have reasonable reasons as to why he isn't good enough, as opposed to the usual tripe about battering ram, pointy elbows and dirty git.
like many have said, id have him here so long as he isnt the main midfield signing. with scholes,fletcher? and possible anderson our central midfield needs some bolstering. having him for some league games could be useful, but certainly in terms if european challenge and the title, we need somebody better.
Why would I take it personally when it wasn't even aimed at me? I just think it was a shit way to respond to his post, which was completely balanced and probably the best in the last few pages. Certainly better than your Madrid or Dortmund nonsense.
Yes it's all about beating Stoke for me, can't stand these anti-football feckers, fight fire with fire I say and sign a team full of 7 foot 200 pound oafs and beat them with their own weapons.
Seriously we already have like 20 PL titles, not giving a shit about that anymore, shitting all over Stoke on the other hand.
For the quoted price (20+m) and his age, I'm sure he'd be THE main signing for CM.
That's where I've problem with. For years we are in CM drought, and once we have the chance to sign any midfielder, some think Fellaini is the answer. feck that.
Yep, and I totally agree with you on that.
It's always really difficult here when you're trying to argue anything other than one extreme or the other. I recognise that he's a very capable and multi-faceted player - certainly not a 'battering ram' - and I wouldn't mind us signing him if the price wasn't too high. I just don't think he's a good enough 'true CM' to be our solution in midfield, and I don't think he should ever partner Carrick. But I'd take him as a back-up defensive midfielder, a squad player, and as an option for difficult games where we specifically break from our normal approach.
I just think it was a shit way to respond to his post, which was completely balanced and probably the best in the last few pages. Certainly better than your Madrid or Dortmund nonsense.
I don't know, but you do seem to be. You apparently really, really didn't like my Madrid-Dortmund post for some reason, since you've called it nonsense four or five times now. A number of good posters agreed with me, so it can't have been all that bad.
Well no, I can assure you I didn't take your response to Cristiano_RAFC personally. You made a few posts on Madrid/Dortmund, the Madrid stuff about needing Modric to come in was just bollocks. They played best with a Khedira/Alonso midfield, going on that winning streak early on last season before obviously winning the league.
As I said at the time you clearly don't want Fellaini and are just creating arguments from nothing to try and back that up, even when they have no real basis.
I think he's a good player. Every year we expect these exciting continental talents arriving, but someone unassuming like Fellaini is always more likely. If he was about 2ft shorter and had a different head, less people would be against the idea.
They're the reasons he is good for a midtable team. Lack of intelligence, technique, pace, passing and discipline are why he isn't good for a top4 outfit.
He's an average midfielder who's just really tall.
No one else was going to...
He's called an average midfielder because he is really tall.
Cunto I think you lost all credibility in this thread when you said United have to scout him and then give a report of that to David Moyes.
Everton is his level....nobody is saying he's shit.
I'd love it if you lot signed him as your new MF general.
I'd love it if you lot signed him as your new MF general.
I know.
I had meant to say that by coming to United that Moyes can see our staff's evaluation of Fellaini, which will be a hell of a lot different to Everton's, I'd imagine.
As in Moyes comes in and reckons Fellaini would be a quality signing here, sees that our staff reckon he'd only be fourth or fifth choice and decides against it.
I know.
I had meant to say that by coming to United that Moyes can see our staff's evaluation of Fellaini, which will be a hell of a lot different to Everton's, I'd imagine.
As in Moyes comes in and reckons Fellaini would be a quality signing here, sees that our staff reckon he'd only be fourth or fifth choice and decides against it.
As in to see what the general opinion of him is by the scouts of a top team?
I suppose the use in that depends on how strong you believe our scouting network is.
Yeah, because I'd imagine the level a player is considered good enough for Everton is much lower than the level that'd be considered good enough for United.
Hence, United staff and scout reports could contradict everything Moyes feels about Fellaini.
I'm really, really not. I realise that's a convenient way for you to try and discredit anyone who disagrees with you, but as you'll see from plenty of my comments, I rate Fellaini much higher than plenty of people in here. I don't have some kind of vendetta against him. As I said to Paceme, I wouldn't even particularly mind if we bought him. I just don't think he's the right player to partner Carrick, for the reasons that I expressed, pretty sensibly I thought, in my 'nonsense', 'made up', 'no real basis' Madrid post. The one which plenty of other people then agreed with.
You seem intent on turning this into some sort of sarky drubbing match, but it's not. I just don't agree with you.
I genuinely can't believe that some people want us to fork out 20m plus on fecking Fellaini
Watched that video as well. What can I say. He does look quite clumsy and a bit sluggish. But he's effective for sure. His footwork is better than people give him credit for and with his physical presence he'll be a handful for anyone. He just finds a way to score or assist goals when he get's anywhere near the box. Ridiculous hair though.
I wouldn't say I'd have him at the top of our transfer list. We can aim higher.
- Status