Fellaini
- Thread starter Bilbo
- Start date
- Status
I would wager that less than half of the players he signed in his time at Everton were from the Premier League. Which would make you wrong.
Already proved - it's more like 1/3 of the players he signed, and most of those were freebie cast-offs like Saha and Gibson.
Good one. That highly paid team of Jewish writers is really starting to pay off.
Just did a quick calculation and it's around 22 out of 56.
http://www.soccerbase.com/teams/team.sd?team_id=942&teamTabs=transfers
...You're saying at this moment in time, Pogba is a far better player than Fellaini?
Did you ever actually watch us play? Scholes got booked a lot, for few fouls. Fellaini had the most fouls in the league.
Whoosh.....
I'd say that's quite obvious, yes. He's a far better CM at least. I'll admit that Fellaini shits all over him when it comes to playing as a target man.
Im one of those who hope we get Fellaini but I would rather have had Pogba
His career at Everton means little now. He's at United now. My point is that if he doesn't deliver success that the knifes from media and fans will come out irrespective on whether he bought 'safe' bets or not. FFS before the treble season there were still fans and critics questioning whether SAF has what it takes to win the CL. However there's a twist to that. If Moyes bring 1-2 dunces and we still win important honors then no one (or few) will give any notice. Viv Anderson was far from SAF's best signings but no one gives a feck to that doesn't we?
Bet you thought that about Valencia too.
If his career at Everton means little now, then on what basis did you come to the conclusion that "his football knowledge which seems limited to the EPL"?
The next question has to be ... what happens if we fail to sign Fellaini?! 
So you talk about what he knows then dismiss the past as irrelevant. Unbefeckingliveable.
I am talking how the media/critics will think if things go wrong......My point is that Moyes will be judged on success and not his signings.
Oh well....think what you like. Im sick of repeating myself. If you want to focus on bits and pieces of my post be my guest.
Why are you even shocked?
Grow up and have the balls to stand over what you post when someone questions it.
is what you said.
It was pointed out that you were wrong by showing where his signings at Everton were sourced.
That is not bits and pieces of your post but disagreeing with something you said backed up with facts. That's a discussion forum for you.
Well I'd definitely disagree, they're very different players and I think it's premature to say that Pogba already eclipses Fellaini. I'd rather Pogba as well, but Fellaini is far more experienced and is vastly underrated as a CM because Moyes barely used him as such.
Just no. He needs two players next to him doing all the work just so he can shine, that's not the sign of someone who is a good CM, he will likely become one but right now? He's not, he's simply a good player.
The next question has to be ... what happens if we fail to sign Fellaini?!
Failaini.
You never done anything else than repeating yourself!
Yes.
The people in question are the media, a substantial number of fans and the critics. During that post we were talking about how important it is for Moyes to get it right in his first transfers (indirectly justifying the strategy of bringing in former Everton player who Moyes know well and should dissapoint him). I said that this is BS as Moyes will be judged on success and if he wins important honors he will still be considered as a success irrespectively whom he sign. I also showed how, in my opinion, the critics, fans and media (the people) would criticize Moyes if he failed to do so.
Bring the whole post. Come on you can do it....
Why, it was that bit I had issue with. The bit you got totally wrong. You haven't managed to actually see it with it highlighted, there is no way you would had I quoted the whole post.
You've changed your whole argument now.
Repeating yourself again.
Quoting a tiny piece of a post without understanding the thought behind it and its relevance in the entire post is a bit retarded.
Its what I was saying all along. And I explained it 4-5 times. That's the problem when people quote tiny bits of posts without first understanding the flow of the argument. If you have further inquires just ask.
No, I'm not happy that you can, on a discussion forum, make such a factually incorrect statement and then derail the whole conversation while ignoring the fact that you are plainly talking through your arse.
- Status