RedRover
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2007
- Messages
- 9,082
So why make it public now when United haven't?
Its bizzare. If the players arent for sale, or the offer's to low then reject the bid and move on.
Not really. You bid a £1 over the clause and it was a dicky move. It's also less than what Liverpool were prepared to sell him at. I don't see the difference other than the clubs involved. Utd have made a bid for players. Simple as that.Well as in this case, it was the Merseyside club that did all the leaking.
Our bids were a little different because of the whole clause issue. The two cases aren't really comparable.
feck off, I'm not being an arse. Well, maybe I am, but not with my view that it isn't insulting. What's insulting about a substantial bid for two players? They'd make a profit on Baines, who isn't worth £12mil, and Fellaini obviously isn't worth the fee on the buy-out clause, or someone would have triggered it as I've said, if Everton want to reject the bid then by all means, that's their prerogative, but insulting? Disrespectful? Offensive? Give me a break.
The offer from United would represent a £7mil profit on the initial outlay by Everton. How insulting.
I'm disgusted and appalled that my club would offer to sign footballers for more than what their current club paid for them. This is a sad day for football.
An Arsenal fan criticizing United over lowballing.
and much as much as I sympathise with Everton, I think a statement on OS is a bit too much.
Indeed. And Utd managed to handle that without looking like wankers.If the figures are correct we did take the piss with our opening bid....... but it is an opening bid and that happens. I wouldn't pay any more than £35m for the pair though.
If anybody wants to talk about derisory, let's talk Chelsea and Rooney.
Not really. You bid a £1 over the clause and it was a dicky move. It's also less than what Liverpool were prepared to sell him at. I don't see the difference other than the clubs involved. Utd have made a bid for players. Simple as that.
Nah, he has said exactly what was needed to be said.
I could make Kevin feckin' Kilbane look good enough through a youtube compilation they don't mean shit.
United offered what they think is fair value. If Everton don't agree then reject the bid, tell United either they are not for sell at any price, or not at the current valuation. No need to run to the press whining like bitches about how offensive the bid is. It's a bid for a couple of footballers, that represents a profit to Everton.When I said genuine offer, I really meant an offer that Everton would have a 1% chance of accepting.
Maybe watch the player then....you know the real thing?
And no it is impossible to make Kilbane look good through a Youtube compilation, as you actually need good things to put in it.
What club has done anything like what Arsenal did. Clearly Liverpool thought it was insulting given their reaction. perhaps if Arsenal had not been so dicky they would've been more open to negotiations. It's an opening bid and they're not worth much more than what's been offered. Utd haven't told anyone about this. Why have Everton?It wasn't really. If you believe a release clause to be anything above £40m, why would you bid more? We were wrong, it seems, but the reasoning stands.
No-one is complaining that United have made a bid for the players. It's just £28m is never in a million years going to be accepted and it is a derisory bid.
United offered what they think is fair value. If Everton don't agree then reject the bid, tell United either they are not for sell at any price, or not at the current valuation. No need to run to the press whining like bitches about how offensive the bid is. It's a bid for a couple of footballers, that represents a profit to Everton.
Its probably a fair, reasonable price for Baines, and in my opinion, probably about right for Fellaini. Everton won't agree, they'll value him higher but he clearly isn't worth his buy out clause, and I wouldn't value him much higher than they paid for him. You'd get McCarthy for around what we've supposedly bid for Fellaini, and I'd do that rather than up the bid. I wouldn't bid any higher for Baines.
Where's the insult?
United offered what they think is fair value. If Everton don't agree then reject the bid, tell United either they are not for sell at any price, or not at the current valuation. No need to run to the press whining like bitches about how offensive the bid is. It's a bid for a couple of footballers, that represents a profit to Everton.
Its probably a fair, reasonable price for Baines, and in my opinion, probably about right for Fellaini. Everton won't agree, they'll value him higher but he clearly isn't worth his buy out clause, and I wouldn't value him much higher than they paid for him. You'd get McCarthy for around what we've supposedly bid for Fellaini, and I'd do that rather than up the bid. I wouldn't bid any higher for Baines.
Where's the insult?
This statement for me means that the deal will most likely happen, for a start they don't make it clear that they won't sell, they just want more money, which i think they'll get eventually.
This is a chance in a lifetime for baines and fellaini, i can't see how everton can keep them after this.
What club has done anything like what Arsenal did. Clearly Liverpool thought it was insulting given their reaction. perhaps if Arsenal had not been so dicky they would've been more open to negotiations. It's an opening bid and they're not worth much more than what's been offered. Utd haven't told anyone about this. Why have Everton?
You're thinking about this as a United fan and what you'd consider to be a good deal for your club. I don't think you've moved with the times. Everton can point to the fact that you spent near enough £25m on Van Persie in the last year of his deal, but decide that Fellaini and Baines, heavily contracted, are only worth £28m between them. From their point of view, I imagine that's the insult.
Our club is stuck in 2005 when it comes to transfer fees.
What the feck has Van Persie got to do with it? He's worth about twice as much as Fellaini and Baines combined. They might as well moan about how Real Madrid paid 80m for Ronaldo yet we won't offer 40m for that freak of a microphone.
What was the point of leaking it, if they were gonna make it official anyway?
And can this Baines shit please stop!?
It's not an arguement. It's a point that they don't have a case for calling the club classless. Neville, Saha, Gibson all went to Everton for a pittance. With Howard they got on loan first to help them make up their mind. Yes, Utd were generous in what they offered for Rooney. It was a massive fee for an 18 year old.
They leaked it today.They didn't want to stir shit before their first game of the season.
Our club is stuck in 2005 when it comes to transfer fees.
They leaked it today.
I have that's the problem.
Zaha was 10m and probably the right cost to pay.Only when it comes to players of the highest quality. We were happy to pay something like 15m for Zaha, a Championship winger.
Only when it comes to players of the highest quality. We were happy to pay something like 15m for Zaha, a Championship winger.
I liked Everton's reason for not making it public earlier btw.
We didn't reveal as it would disrupt Martinez's preparations for the first match but we'll reveal it now so it disrupts Martinez's preparations for the second match.