Red Indian Chief Torn Rubber
Thus says Kemo
as long as he will be able to beat his man consistently Im all for it
A top right winger who can score goals and has a great final ball? He'd be competing with Lingard, Memphis, Young and Mata out on the wing.... I'd say we need anyone who is half decent on the wing with pace. Hell, half the premier league wingers would walk into our side. Let alone De Bruyne who is a brilliant player. He's not the perfect fit like Sanchez would've been, but he's got enough pace to be a threat on the right as he's shown for city.Wait, how on earth did we need De Bruyne? I know he's a good player, but he hardly fits the profile.
Sanchez wasn't interested in joining us.
Felipe to United would not make a lot of sense, especially for £30 million+ - because for that amount of money, and in terms of being a January signing, the expectation would be for him to make an instant impact. And he's far too inconsistent right now to be able to do that, especially when transitioning from the Seria A to the Premier League. In terms of his potential over the medium term, Felipe would be a quality addition to the squad, and maybe even become a big long-term contributor - provided we develop him properly and place him in a system which would bring out the best qualities in him. To the arguments about him being a nothing player/ worse than Young, the videos have done him a disservice; plus, he's underperforming this season - Stefano Pioli has mismanaged him repeatedly, a lot of times he has made him a space goat for the team's failing as a whole, the player reportedly doesn't get along with him, Di Marzio said he thought he was leaving Lazio but had to stay because the deal fell through, etc. All of that is having an effect on his performances when this was supposed to the year when he progressed to another level, after the fireworks to close the previous season out. Youtube compilations aren't the be all and end all for gauging someone's talent - a quick browse through of Di María or Hernández's tepid body of work under Louis is testament to that.
In terms of what he could offer - he would add deadly pace, dribbling ability and goals from wider areas (which is what we need right now). More of a momentum based dribbler than a wizard in tight spaces - he can outrun most players but needs some space to operate in - so ideally suited to a counter-attacking setup like Leicester where he'll have room to operate in on the break, than a possession team where he'll be asked to be a quality passer in the build up and probe defenses. Also, he is almost exactly the type of player Van Gaal detests with all his might - not one for adhering to strict tactical instructions, temperamental, cocky, can give the impression that he knows better. Flashes immense potential in one game, then blows cold for the next two - sometimes you wonder how he is even a professional footballer when his form is bad - overall he's very much a work in progress and not what we need. More of a Fergie type of youngster - a little fragile mentally, someone who needs an arm around the neck from time to time, to be reassured, and given the license to try things until he finds some consistency. Van Gaal will see an inconsistent Brazilian who needs to be infused with automatism, and completely ruin him by limiting his movement, individuality and impact on the game. Think it's best for both United and Felipe if we don't sign him.
I said earlier he's been our best outfield player, but he's also not scored anywhere near enough. Missed a few sitters.hang on, how in anyway has Martial not been 'as good as we thought'?
He can't score every chance he gets. Finishing wise he's been fine. If we created more chances he would score more, simple as. For a 19/20 year old, 7 goals after half a season in a side struggling going forward as much as ours is fine. Just look at how many goals the likes of Messi, Rooney and Ronaldo scored at that age. All between 10-20 goals in all comps for the season. Martial is on course for that.I said earlier he's been our best outfield player, but he's also not scored anywhere near enough. Missed a few sitters.
He's been class I know, but my point was he's not entirely lived up to his £36m+ price tag. Not a problem yet, of course, because he's always improving. Another issue is he's been stuck out on the wing way too much.
We have/had no top quality #10 and he's far more adept at playing out on the right as a wide playmaker than Mata is.Wait, how on earth did we need De Bruyne? I know he's a good player, but he hardly fits the profile.
A top right winger who can score goals and has a great final ball? He'd be competing with Lingard, Memphis, Young and Mata out on the wing.... I'd say we need anyone who is half decent on the wing with pace. Hell, half the premier league wingers would walk into our side. Let alone De Bruyne who is a brilliant player. He's not the perfect fit like Sanchez would've been, but he's got enough pace to be a threat on the right as he's shown for city.
Considering most of us had only seen him play versus Arsenal, he's exceeded expectations. He was 19 when we signed him and is already our best player. I don't know what expectations you had but I think most here are very pleased with him.I said earlier he's been our best outfield player, but he's also not scored anywhere near enough. Missed a few sitters.
He's been class I know, but my point was he's not entirely lived up to his £36m+ price tag. Not a problem yet, of course, because he's always improving. Another issue is he's been stuck out on the wing way too much.
I regret mentioning Martial now the only point I was making is that he was very expensive for a youngster, and spending a similar amount on Anderson might be a bit crazy. I couldn't give a shite if it works out though. Not my money anyway!He can't score every chance he gets. Finishing wise he's been fine. If we created more chances he would score more, simple as. For a 19/20 year old, 7 goals after half a season in a side struggling going forward as much as ours is fine. Just look at how many goals the likes of Messi, Rooney and Ronaldo scored at that age. All between 10-20 goals in all comps for the season. Martial is on course for that.
Also, with him, he's not being stuck on the wing. If anything, I like him more on the wing right now as he can get more involved and be more of a constant threat. He's by far our best winger and the only one in our team who can make something happen consistently. Everyone else out wide or up front is shite so its harsh to blame him for not having 15 goals already when he's the only one in the front 4 who has the slightest bit of pace, creativity or goalscoring ability.
Owen Hargreaves Norwegian twitter account!
(1/3)
Why are you trying to make out that I think Martial's been shit? I've been very pleased with him too, but again, my point being we've spend £36m (isn't it now £46m after he won golden boy?) on him. Another £40m on Anderson and we're beginning to invest and rely a bit too much on "players with potential".Considering most of us had only seen him play versus Arsenal, he's exceeded expectations. He was 19 when we signed him and is already our best player. I don't know what expectations you had but I think most here are very pleased with him.
I know you don't think he's been shit. You made at clear in your post. Your saying looking at a £36m signing objectively, you'd expect more. We have to look at everything in context especially his age. We paid that price for the footballer he's going to be. Even now he's our most potent threat. That's enough for me.Why are you trying to make out that I think Martial's been shit? I've been very pleased with him too, but again, my point being we've spend £36m (isn't it now £46m after he won golden boy?) on him. Another £40m on Anderson and we're beginning to invest and rely a bit too much on "players with potential".
He plays as a right winger for City, and has been a lot more of a winger then mata. Obviously, he doesn't have explosive pace, but he isn't slow by any means, more like a 7/10 pace and can run with the ball. Not to mention he has a great final ball which is one of our biggest problems. Agree we tend to ruin most attacking players, but De Bruyne I feel would be more suited to Van Gaal's game then either Di Maria or Mata as a wide player.He's not a right winger and he's not blessed with pace?
I mean, I agree, he's a very good player. But he's basically a slightly more mobile version of Mata, and I thought the point of this clamouring for pace and width on the right was just that. De Bruyne wouldn't really give us much we don't already have. He'd probably be an improvement on Mata, but hell, if you gave City Mata and we had De Bruyne I'm pretty sure we'd all be talking about how much a better player Mata is, we have a tendency to make that sort of player look really shit.
Yeah, money wise I don't really care how much we spend just so long as we get better players then what we have considering we're loaded. And yeah, basically your last point is why I don't mind him on the wing. He's basically our best winger and striker by an equal distance ahead of the 2nd best so either way, I don't mind.I regret mentioning Martial now the only point I was making is that he was very expensive for a youngster, and spending a similar amount on Anderson might be a bit crazy. I couldn't give a shite if it works out though. Not my money anyway!
I disagree with the latter part... he's been great on the wing and as you say he's definitely our best winger (not hard), but I think he's going to be the perfect centre forward. He's strong, tall, has excellent feet and can score goals. Why not play him up top considering we have no other bloody options? I suppose then we'd have no options for the wing Jesus
That far back and even he did not like himRivaldo?
I keep hearing this thing. Aren't there any South Americans that have prospered under this coach?
I never said I'm expecting more on a £36m signing either, although I did say he hasn't scored that many but I realise he's young and all that. I think he's been class.I know you don't think he's been shit. You made at clear in your post. Your saying looking at a £36m signing objectively, you'd expect more. We have to look at everything in context especially his age. We paid that price for the footballer he's going to be. Even now he's our most potent threat. That's enough for me.
It's not so much South Americans as Brazilians I think, and Felipe Anderson is very much a less talented Di Maria, a completely unsuitable player for us while LvG is manager.
Does he have the pace of Di Maria? I don't watch much Serie A but the people who do were posting in the summer that he was more of a #10 and not the paciest, which would make him quite redundant with Herrera, Mata and not to mention Memphis and Pereira around here.
I wouldn't say as fast as Di Maria but certainly fast enough from what I've seen, pace is the one area of his game I'd not be worried about.
Blessed with great pace and intricate dribbling skills, Anderson is equally proficient with either foot and possesses a powerful shot. As prolific in making goals as scoring them, he has supplied nine goals and seven assists in his last 11 Serie A outings.
He plays as a right winger for City, and has been a lot more of a winger then mata. Obviously, he doesn't have explosive pace, but he isn't slow by any means, more like a 7/10 pace and can run with the ball. Not to mention he has a great final ball which is one of our biggest problems. Agree we tend to ruin most attacking players, but De Bruyne I feel would be more suited to Van Gaal's game then either Di Maria or Mata as a wide player.
Owen Hargreaves Norwegian twitter account!
I keep hearing this thing. Aren't there any South Americans that have prospered under this coach?
yeah looks like it from his UEFA profile:
http://www.uefa.com/memberassociations/association=ita/news/newsid=2227457.html
Nobody knows our business, no real credible sources but a few reporting it. Probably a nothing story but he'd be a nice addition.Any creditable source reporting this or is it this window's big story of linking a player to United which never materialises?
They are the important words. I would worry paying that sort of money for someone who hasn't shown that sort of form this season. We need somebody has produced that for at least a couple of seasons and more notably this season. I don't want anymore one season wonders or players who are on their way down.
I agree with you, but he's the level of player who could have come in and had an immediate impact for us like he's had for City, instead of resorting to going to players with potential like we pretty much need to do now.Well he doesn't though, he plays from the right, agreed. But he has the freedom to come inside, and spends as much as the time influencing play inside as he does on the wing, if not more. I certainly wouldn't call that a 'winger'. He does have more pace than Mata, which gives him the option to go down the outside, but I'd hardly argue thats his strength. Correct me if I'm wrong, but is the clamour not for a tricky, pacy, wideman, who can beat a man, cross the ball, and chip in with goals? For all of De Bruyne's undoubted virtues, he's not the first player I think of for that criteria.
Who?