TAA returns will be much more reliable than porro, plus he stands a chance of getting a clean sheet. Whereas porro is much less likely to. And what makes you think united won't keep many clean sheets? We've just bought a couple of top drawer CBs and may be buying a dm.
Might have to pop that week 2 wildcard. Absolutely shite. Why did I trust Spurs??I think United will keep more CS than last season (hard to be worse tbh) and our defenders are undervalued, but the problem is a bit with who is nailed and who is not. If Maz was guaranteed or very likely to start 30+ games this season he'd be a better choice than when you take into account the competition for places and his injury record. Martinez might not start all games too and his attack threat is rather poor, so even at 4.5 he's good value but doesn't feel so amazing.
Phew!! Only half of what I thought.I don't understand why is everyone going for a Spurs defender. Spurs are unlikely to keep clean sheets. He is being expected to be a TAA.
Will understand why, after he gets a goal plus assist this GW
Agreed re united, but even taking us out of the equation there are 4.5 options that are worth it Vs porro if it allows you to trade up from gvardiol to taa (Konsa or one of the Newcastle back line). That said I'll be sticking with Martinez until he's injured.
I don't have him so please don't.
For sure so far those than went with Maz/Martinez and spent that 1m elsewhere are better off than me with Porro, let’s see in the long term.
All tempting but even if it seems there will be only 2 DGWs this season (unless something unexpected happens) and we have no fecking clue about this stupid mistery chip, I believe it’s still best to save the TC. GW33 there’s a good chance for Arsenal to have Chelsea at home and Ipswich away and City to have Brighton home, Everton away. I always play it on the doubles and not planning to change that this year I guess
If McKenna is as good as they say, then Ipswich will come out with a solid plan to contain Haaland, and 1 goal Haaland will happen.
Solanke to Wood is the better knee jerk.
And the match was yesterday ffs!
Nonono! Solanke is a keep, he´ll give you steady 2’s and 1’s with an occasional 5 or 6 every now and then.
the 5 and 6 just regular enough to keep you invested but also rare enough to make him a poor investment. Love it.Or WC and bench boost to catch up.
feck off and leave this thread. This is mainly for posters who get 40-60 points.
Same dilemma. I am sticking to my guns on both for now and banking transfers. I do think solanke will start scoring but I also worry about lack of haal.
I’m guessing you have Salah?
That’s definitely bold. You have no KDB either to cover City’s attack for week 2.Nope, I don't have him either and.cant get him in without a good bit of surgery..
I went with Son, Saka, Bruno Jota Amad in midfield. Worked out well enough week 1 but wasted the captain on Son but as a good shout against Leicester.
I'll have to build up a few transfers and see how things go.
Ended up with 80, Munoz with an assist and the rest blanked, so thank feck the lads on Saturday delivered
But in fairness anything 66+ for game week 1 is always going to be a solid start with it generall only 20 points away from top 100k, so I'll take it and run! I'm effectively playing a game agaisnt Haaland, Salah is nearly a differential right now which worked well for me here!
Don't think I'm going to transfer this week, will save it for next week. Just undecided between Amad and Pedro for who starts. Do we think Amad might get dropped for Garnacho?
I think he will start but it could go either way. Something to consider: João Pedro has scored in two of the three matches he's played against us in the league. It's a small sample size, but that record would probably have me lean towards him over Amad.
Don't think I'm going to transfer this week, will save it for next week. Just undecided between Amad and Pedro for who starts. Do we think Amad might get dropped for Garnacho?
The 1st and only - Mr. PS5 Sancho
