I think some of you lot think transfers happen at the click of an icon like they do in video games.
We have Carrick, Cleverley, Anderson, Jones and Giggs.
What were you saying then? You were insinuating that we were wasting our time trying to sign Fabregas and instead should have been trying to sign other targets. The only way that is possible is if there is a limit on the amount of time allotted to negotiate transfers, and that trying to sign Fabregas left less transfer signing time for other targets.
I know what you mean but it isn't a wrong statement in fairness, the whole thing has been a waste of time because he didn't sign a deal in the end. It's as simple as that really. It doesn't matter how many deals your club is working on. So therefore, they aren't wrong for saying that IMO.
Exactly.We have Carrick, Cleverley, Anderson, Jones and Giggs.
Exactly. And it's perfectly normal to harbour some annoyance as a result. So if I (or any other poster) have been a little fraught during the course of this thread, it doesn't mean we're not supporting Moyes, or that we're being spoilt imbeciles, we're simply doing what football fans have been doing throughout the Internet age - moaning on a forum.
Why is it a waste of time?
Thats the question I keep asking but all i ever hear is "because he didnt sign"
Well thats complete nonsense. Do you think Real Madrid sit back and think "well, we'd better not try and sign player X because the club said that they wont sell?" Do they feck. They keep going. Even if they dont get the player, they plant the notion in his head. Thats not a waste of time.
And besides, if we all thought "feck, we'll never sign him", then we will never end up signing the high-end players. Clubs generally dont put high-end players on the open transfer market
Would the moaners rather we didnt try to sign him at all? Because thats the way it seems
and as for this idea that clubs work on 1 transfer at a time...jaysus would you listen to yourselves
thats the way Gill conducted transfers, doesnt mean thats that way the new guy will conduct transfers
Why is it a waste of time?
Thats the question I keep asking but all i ever hear is "because he didnt sign"
Well thats complete nonsense. Do you think Real Madrid sit back and think "well, we'd better not try and sign player X because the club said that they wont sell?" Do they feck. They keep going. Even if they dont get the player, they plant the notion in his head. Thats not a waste of time.
And besides, if we all thought "feck, we'll never sign him", then we will never end up signing the high-end players. Clubs generally dont put high-end players on the open transfer market
Would the moaners rather we didnt try to sign him at all? Because thats the way it seems
and as for this idea that clubs work on 1 transfer at a time...jaysus would you listen to yourselves
Yep! We definitely need midfielders!
Cleverley failed to make the grade last year. He might/might not be better in the coming season.
Anderson is injury-prone and lacks impact.
Jones is a defender.
Giggs, with all due respect, is a bit part player now (sadly).
Ferguson had to weave magic to make it work, at least in the Premiership, last season. But Ferguson was one a one-of-a-kind.
Carrick is a top midfielder.
Giggs has lots of experience.
Jones is ambitious and held Ronaldo.
Anderson is a talented Brazilian once considered one of the biggest talents in the world.
Cleverley is a full international.
Everything's good.
ambitiousCarrick is a top midfielder.
Giggs has lots of experience.
Jones is ambitious and held Ronaldo.
Anderson is a talented Brazilian once considered one of the biggest talents in the world.
Cleverley is a full international.
Everything's good.
ambitious
once considered one of the biggest talents in football
What is this shit?
What an embarassing saga this is.
What an embarassing saga this is.
It's not exactly embarrassing...mind blogging is probably a better term. Why would we bid for a player who-by all signs- seems to be unattainable . I'm not buying these private encouragement theories.
I guess 'embarrassing' is better than 'confused and angry'!
I'm not buying these private encouragement theories.
So let me get this straight.
You dont 'buy' that the club had encouragement to bid , but you do 'buy' that the entire hierarchy of the club, which includes Fergie, havent a fecking clue what they are doing and are just throwing bids around willy nilly.
It's not exactly embarrassing...mind blogging is probably a better term. Why would we bid for a player who-by all signs- seems to be unattainable . I'm not buying these private encouragement theories.
Regarding Wengers comments, he is unlikely to say he thinks the player is available because if (big if) he does join United then there would be a back lash on Wenger for not attempting to resign him. Playing dumb can give Wenger the excuse he knew nothing of his availability.
Funny, Senna had this to say about it.No, it wasn't about Carick. Signing someone else is fine, but negotiating for a player seriously and then saying 'never mind' is probably a waste of everyone's time. Like people here said, you can sound out a player or a club, but you can't go too far if you're working on another deal that would mean the cancellation of another.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/m/man_utd/5342308.stm
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-401170/United-close--163-17m-Hargreaves.html