alastair
ignorant
All great. But isn't it 50% of the profit, not total revenue?
Ah, that's a spanner in the works. That makes it a little more enticing.
All great. But isn't it 50% of the profit, not total revenue?
I've seen journos say it, but there's no way it's 50% simpliciter. It'll be on the profit.
Yep, I was being a little naive there. I still think there's a lot about this that doesn't add-up. All of the 'reliable' Arsenal sources are absolutely convinced we'll get him.
I really doubt united wouldn't have done some homework, whatever clause exists, if there is any I'm sure they've factored it in. As for Fabregas I'm sure he'd still want to give himself the best chance to win stuff, and its got to help that RVP, Nasri, clichy, Toure have all left and been successful. Plus in all honesty if say you only had enough for one big signing you don't need Fabregas as much as you could use a top class striker. Wilshere and Carzola as a middle two with Arteta holding can be very good if you can keep wilshere fit.
Yep, I was being a little naive there. I still think there's a lot about this that doesn't add-up. All of the 'reliable' Arsenal sources are absolutely convinced we'll get him.
You don't seem to have factored wagesI was considering this whole deal today, and if my maths is anywhere near correct, I don't understand what Barcelona would really gain from the sale. There is this argument going around that they want to offload Fabregas in order to fund the sale of a top centre-half, but I don't see any circumstances under which this is possible.
The clauses Arsenal supposedly have are as follows: let's say for the sake of argument a buy back clause at the price at which Cesc was sold(£35m) and a 50% sell-on fee on whatever Barcelona get for him upon sale.
It's also been widely reported that Barcelona haven't even nearly paid Arsenal in full for Fabregas, with the deal having been made in installments. Currently, of the £35m, they've given us £20m.
All this means that I struggle to see the motive for Barcelona to sell. If they sell back to Arsenal, we will automatically have £15m knocked off the price for the unpaid money from the original transfer, plus another £5m of the Alex Song transfer, meaning they essentially only gain a £15m 'profit' on the whole deal.
Given that we have first refusal, this means Cesc has to categorically turn down any advance from Arsenal and decide that he will join Manchester United. Saying he does this, that means Barcelona will need to get top dollar to make it really worth losing him. If they sell for £40m, we get an automatic £20m, plus the money they still owe on the original transfer, totalling £15m, which leads us to £35m. Barcelona, selling at £40m, would actually make, for themselves, £5m.
Therefore, they need to sell at a fee around £60-70m to make it worth their while, but the fees United are offering are in that £40m range. I don't see how this is remotely enticing for Barcelona. Also, if they say openly he's up for sale, and he doesn't mind returning to Arsenal, they will be forced to accept our knock-down bid agreed two years ago. This makes no sense.
Yep, I was being a little naive there. I still think there's a lot about this that doesn't add-up. All of the 'reliable' Arsenal sources are absolutely convinced we'll get him.
Don't. You. Dare.
These aren't games, though. Fabregas is their player and they dictate to us what is acceptable. If we were in the region they wanted then they would have sat down and sorted the deal. Instead we've dragged our feet for a few days, showing no conviction in what we are doing.
In the past we'd just announce that a deal was done. The bit we didn't hear about was likely the negotiations where we had a small difference in values to make up. The fact we are publicly having bid after bid knocked back makes me feel this is us just chancing our arm a little.
This summer? I doubt it. If things stay the same I can see him going back to your lot next summer.
RTE?
According to journos, that 25m clause Arsenal have will only kick in if Fabregas tells to Barcelona that he wants to go to Arsenal. Nearly as pointless as the Suarez clause.
It may be simply a case of two inexperienced people who don't know what they're doing.
According to journos, that 25m clause Arsenal have will only kick in if Fabregas tells to Barcelona that he wants to go to Arsenal. Nearly as pointless as the Suarez clause.
'Like a new signing' will be heard in the coming weeks.
According to journos, that 25m clause Arsenal have will only kick in if Fabregas tells to Barcelona that he wants to go to Arsenal. Nearly as pointless as the Suarez clause.
What would be quite interesting is if we offered something like £40m and Fabregas told Barca that he wanted to go to Arsenal. I could see Barca putting a lot of pressure on Fabregas to go to the highest bidder, as they'd stand to lose around £15m quid.
Arsenal are definitely a threat to us if Fab became available. But if Fab wants 200k a week wages, would arsenal pay it?
RTE?
They would but I'm not sure why Fabregas will come back to Arsenal.
Arsenal are definitely a threat to us if Fab became available. But if Fab wants 200k a week wages, would arsenal pay it?
Arsenal are definitely a threat to us if Fab became available. But if Fab wants 200k a week wages, would arsenal pay it?
What would be quite interesting is if we offered something like £40m and Fabregas told Barca that he wanted to go to Arsenal. I could see Barca putting a lot of pressure on Fabregas to go to the highest bidder, as they'd stand to lose around £15m quid.
And they're handling the transfer business of one of the world's biggest football clubs? I hope you're wrong mate.
I probably am. But has Woodward ever conducted, or been involved in, a transfer negotiation?
Had a peek at the barca forums to see what their fans were saying. they're all pretty much 100% convinced he's staying and we are wasting our time. It's very difficult to see otherwise. Some glimmer of hope from the man himself would be nice.
I think using Nasri and Toure there is pushing it, but fair enough.
I reckon we'd rather he stuck it out at Barcelona allowing us to get all our transfer business done without having to worry about him going to United. If it becomes clear he's leaving, we'll do all we can to make sure it's to us.
Thanks for clarifying the song. Was scratching my head for a bit there.Last year a few guys tried to get the song 'When I find myself in times of trouble, Arsene Wenger says to me, He's like a new signing, Diaby, Diaby,' going in the ground, unsuccessfully.(to the tune of Let It Be).
Fourth place fighters, Arsenal? Behave, he left there for a reason.
Aye. And would Barca pay it - he's 26 now, his contract expires in 2016. Given his status (he's a wanted man, obviously) it seems inevitable Barca will have to either offer him a new and vastly more lucrative contract (supposedly our offer is twice the amount he makes at the moment), or risk him becoming seriously grumpy, probably handing in a transfer request. They're at a crossroads with him, it would seem: Offer him a fat, new contract and thus go for him, long-term as a central player in the set-up - or decide, as Pep seemingly did, that he isn't the one to run their midfield in the years to come...
Thanks for clarifying the song. Was scratching my head for a bit there.
Think the ball is in our court now, not Cesc's. If we want him that bad, then let's offer £40m, and if Barca accept, Cesc will know they want the money more than they want him. I really don't believe he wants to leave, but should they accept a bid, i think he will leave.
Funny, a lot of Barcelona fans seem to think we're after Fabregas as a replacement for Rooney in the no.10 role. A lot of them seem to think that's his best/favourite position and that if he leaves it'll be because he wants to be a 1st choice player in that role. Surely we'd be playing him deeper than that, no?