I did. And, as it stands, BBC's sources, for me anyway, would be more reputable than the shite we're seeing on Twitter and elsewhere.
Fabregas
- Thread starter Reapersoul20
- Start date
-
In the latest episode of the United Hour Podcast, Nik and Imran are here to talk about a frustrating 2 points dropped at Crystal Palace. They then discuss the regeneration of Old Trafford. Finally, Nik is joined by special guest Michael Statham from the Football Oranje podcast - who gives us a more in depth look at our EL opposition FC Twente, and then runs through the (many) Dutch connections currently at United.
- Status
I did. And, as it stands, BBC's sources, for me anyway, would be more reputable than the shite we're seeing on Twitter and elsewhere.
The BBC website print any old gossip as well. Anyone who unquestioningly believes what they read is a muppet.
So you're very much the muppet in this scenario.
This is just a retread of the shit in Sport newspaper.
This idea about bidding for alternative motives other than to sign the player is so overstated - as is how much the club care what we think about transfers and the idea that they try to appease us by making silly bids. I mean there's a massive hole in our midfield and Moyes does the respectable thing in going for the best players first - why on earth is Moyes trying to sign one of the best midfielders in the world to fix it, why?!?! Then people would complain if we signed a lesser player first that we didn't keep our options open.
Not that making fake bids for Fabregas makes any sense anyway - we've reportedly missed out on Thiago, why don't we also show everyone that we missed out on Fabregas also?
Oh and there's loads of time left - Chelsea, Arsenal and Barcelona have still to do their main transfer dealings, I'm sure there will be plenty more. Have some patience.
Could be true, yes. But, BBC's article is currently the most reputable.
The BBC have no sources in Soain. They barely have sources in England.
What did BBC say?
The same BBC that showed footage of "Syrians celebrating a rebel victory", which was later proven to be unrelated footage from INDIA.
The same BBC that had Thiago coming here?
Either your wumming, or are extremely thick.
Admit to wumming to save face!
As of now, BBC's article is the best source we have.
Of course. My personal view is that everyone should abandon thread until there's some actual news on this, because it's going around in circles.
I think there's very little chance of Fabregas being signed. But I am constantly berating muppets who believe any old unsourced shit they read. So to be consistent I've got to berate you for the same.I'm the muppet because I'm approaching this Fabregas story with more than a hint of pessimism?
Yeah, true.
I don't understand why some people see this as embarrassing, trying to sign a world class player is never easy, if it happens great, if it doesn't, life goes on. It's not like being rejected by a woman you know.
Cough... snei...cough...jder
Actually charleysurf is the redcafe muppet's Antichrist.
Are Barca looking for new attacking midfielders now?
http://dailymilan.com/honda-refused-barcelona-to-join-ac-milan-bronzetti/
---
It's ON!
http://dailymilan.com/honda-refused-barcelona-to-join-ac-milan-bronzetti/
---
It's ON!
The main optimism for us is the Moyes and Woodward being mad into this deal.
We're all just hoping there's more to it, than new to the job chaps becoming a bit too over excited, there has to be surely.
Then there's their manager suddenly going unexpectedly, which at best will surely delay things, and at worst completely screw them up.
Try and keep the faith, even though City have lashed 100m, and Chelsea have made a couple of signings and have Mourinho back.
We're all just hoping there's more to it, than new to the job chaps becoming a bit too over excited, there has to be surely.
Then there's their manager suddenly going unexpectedly, which at best will surely delay things, and at worst completely screw them up.
Try and keep the faith, even though City have lashed 100m, and Chelsea have made a couple of signings and have Mourinho back.
It's Moyes' first year, he needs all the resources he can get.
SAF may be able to win the league with bare stripped midfield, but Moyes have not only tactical element but also the pressure and other non tactical elements.
In general we're quite stable during SAF era because we are confident that he can deliver and have delivered in the past, the same can't be said with Moyes, a few bad results can snowball into a vicious circle pretty fast.
Therefore Imo we should probably buy more options more than we actually need for the "just in case" situation.
Cabaye and Fellaini (just throwing names here), they're not world class, but we probably can seal the deal with less hassle and more success rate. Even with Fabregas we'll still be short in the midfield for experiment, injuries, suspensions, tactical, etc.
It's not FM, but we could use more midfielders pronto
SAF may be able to win the league with bare stripped midfield, but Moyes have not only tactical element but also the pressure and other non tactical elements.
In general we're quite stable during SAF era because we are confident that he can deliver and have delivered in the past, the same can't be said with Moyes, a few bad results can snowball into a vicious circle pretty fast.
Therefore Imo we should probably buy more options more than we actually need for the "just in case" situation.
Cabaye and Fellaini (just throwing names here), they're not world class, but we probably can seal the deal with less hassle and more success rate. Even with Fabregas we'll still be short in the midfield for experiment, injuries, suspensions, tactical, etc.
It's not FM, but we could use more midfielders pronto
Are Barca looking for new attacking midfielders now?
http://dailymilan.com/honda-refused-barcelona-to-join-ac-milan-bronzetti/
---
It's ON!
Be surprised if they were in for Honda, he'd be more suited to the front three rather than the midfield three, wouldn't he? Mind you, Barcelona did utilise Fabregas in the front three...
Honda is nowhere near good enough for Barca.
I thought this deal was a no-go from the start, and am confident of retaining our title, with no further additions.
However, I refuse to take an unquoted source, as proof of me being right. I want facts before believing any "new" twists.
Be surprised if they were in for Honda, he'd be more suited to the front three rather than the midfield three, wouldn't he? Mind you, Barcelona did utilise Fabregas in the front three...
I'd be surprised, they're not exactly the type to go for japanese.. they're more like the brazilian wonderkids hangout tavern to me
He'd have to prove a bit more before being a part of the first XI yeah, but then again who are they going to successfully sign who's ready to jump straight into their midfield? Whoever they sign will be a "backup" plan. Seeing as Honda has done really well in the Netherlands, Russia and for Japan, and that he is practially free, he'd be a very likely signing for Barca imo. He certainly has more than enough skill to be plan B.
Nail in the coffin.
Olly. Olly ffs that's incredible.What's the source material?
hahahaha excellent
my god- Status