Are people just writing any old shit off twitter as facts in this thread now?
Fabregas
- Thread starter Reapersoul20
- Start date
- Status
If that's true, we should be bidding to get Vidal instead.
Rooney not for sale = he's definitely leaving
Fabregas not for sale = he's definitely staying at Barca
Brilliant logic.
Fabregas not for sale = he's definitely staying at Barca
Brilliant logic.
Are people taking turns to WUM the thread now?! This thread is a complete train wreck.
I don't know what's more unlikely - Barcelona sources telling the truth or Man United leaking their bids for Cesc even though they've been told he's categorically not for sale.
source?
I'm guessing, NO!
Big different between United's and Barcelona's approach in stating a player isn't for sale with Rooney and Fabregas.
It isn't comparable. Rooney doesn't want to play for United anymore. Fabregas is at his hometown dream club and hasn't said a thing, so as far as we know he could be very happy there.
If that's true. I didn't say that he's having a medical at Madrid.
No, but I did hear that Barca are paying Ibrahimovich's 75M release clause. And as he and Fabregas don't get on, it must be on for us.
Only if it helps show the club and the new staff in bad light.
As long as a Barcelona source says things, it's obviously over.
Onto the Cabaye thread.
Onto the Cabaye thread.
Yes United's manager said no.
A Barcelona source said, the president said, no.
Spot the difference.
43 million GBP actually.
Posting a BBC article is considered WUM worthy now?
I fear for some muppets, they only see what they want.Indykaila has just reported the bid's been rejected. This is definitely over. Unless he says otherwise later.
Tbf there is a big difference between the Rooney and Cesc situations. Rooney very clearly wants to leave whereas it seems Cesc is lukewarm at best at the possibility of leaving.
I'm not much of a muppet, but constantly posting the same discredited gossip is a crime against humanity.Posting a BBC article is considered WUM worthy now?
Ooops!Posting a BBC article is considered WUM worthy now?
Yeah, because both player's situations are the same right now
How do we know they aren't? How do we know that Fabregas isn't pushing for a move too?
Moyes said Rooney's training well and isn't for sale, but ducked any questions relating to Rooney's desire to remain at United. Rooney has remained silent. And on top of that, he's left the pre season tour.
Fabregas expressed his desire to remain at Barcelona. The club president, largely in charge of transfers, stated he's not for sale. Tito, then Barcelona manager, stated Fabregas didn't want to leave aswell.
You can read into the different approaches both ways.
Quote please?
Not "a source close to..."
How ironic!
That was before we made an official bid. Anything could have happened since he made those comments.
Because he hasn't handed in a transfer request like Rooney has?
Posting a BBC article is considered WUM worthy now?
We saw the same source that said Thiago was joining United.
He's not the club president. You're going back to an old story to justify new "gossip".And that gossip is from Sport newspaper. The Catalan Daily Star.
It's still a reputable quote from a reputable source.
That was before the second bid.
What's changed today, apart from BBC quoting unnamed sources?
What's changed today, apart from BBC quoting unnamed sources?
BBC's reputation being a lot stronger than anyone else quoted thus far in this saga other than Fabregas and Barcelona themselves, I'm gonna side towards their story more for the moment.
Hah, now i know you're wumming.
Has Rooney done that? My apologies if he has as I'm not following that saga at all.
If you honestly think BBC print shite like others, you're one deluded muppet.
Did you read it?
The source?
The problem is with BBC sources is that they usually come straight from the clubs involved, who aren't necessarily telling the truth.
- Status