Vidyoyo
The bad "V"
Not saying Russell doesn't do it but it's a bit outrageous Max is accusing him of that after what he did in Mexico (twice).
Still all to play for 1 point between top 2I think me and my husband are going into the final race level on super bru points
I've beaten him twice so far (or is it 3 times) including the whole Red Cafe league last year
Still all to play for 1 point between top 2
10.5 points this week, but just like Lewis I have had a disappointing season
Seems his point is that Russell was pretending it wasn't a big deal afterwards and blowing it off only to then do a 180 in front of the stewards. Like the brother or sister who s ok until Mom and Dad come home and then tries to get you detention. Thats how it came across to me anyway. It doesn't sound like Max took issue with his on track response on the comms.Not saying Russell doesn't do it but it's a bit outrageous Max is accusing him of that after what he did in Mexico (twice).
Must be hard to grow up where everyone “junior” to you is subservient and then find out that those growing up in western democracy’s don’t give a shit about your entitled opinions.MBS really pissed off hahaha.
Think Alonso said something similar in Australia, basically confirming what many already thought about Russell anyway.
“he stabbed himself 42 times whilst shaving.”Christian Horner on Perez: "He knows the pressures of this business, we're going to give him all the support we can until the chequered flag in Abu Dhabi. What he decides to do is going to be his decision".
Seems his point is that Russell was pretending it wasn't a big deal afterwards and blowing it off only to then do a 180 in front of the stewards. Like the brother or sister who s ok until Mom and Dad come home and then tries to get you detention. Thats how it came across to me anyway. It doesn't sound like Max took issue with his on track response on the comms.
They really do haunt your dreams don't they.look at this dude expecting introspection from anything red bull related.
I agree, it was an odd choice to not penalize for the starting incident in Brazil but the double yellow in this case was about one of the very few clear cut cases for imposing one it seems. Lando not arguing against that one probably tells you everything you need to know. Having said that - he and everyone else should have never been placed in that position to begin with - including those who got the punctures.If Lando's penalty shows up any inconsistency it's with the token fine he got in Brazil for the false start. Forcing the whole field of cars on cold tyres to drive past an accident clear-up in the pouring rain, after ignoring the starting lights, is way more dangerous than a wing mirror.
So a wing mirror being left on the fastest part of the circuit for 4 laps before it was shredded into smaller parts is what then?Kimi got a 10 second stop and go pen for not slowing down under double yellows during the race in 2017.
https://www.tntsports.co.uk/formula...ss-yellow-flag-penalty_sto6304991/story.shtml
I remember a few grid penalties when done in quali in recent years. Seems fair what Lando got, spoiled a possible good finish to the GP but safety of others needs a heavy penalty.
Christian Horner on Perez: "He knows the pressures of this business, we're going to give him all the support we can until the chequered flag in Abu Dhabi. What he decides to do is going to be his decision".
Bet it's the sponsorship money. They will lose a chunk of prize money by finishing 3rd in constructors.Can't tell if that still reads as they're desperate to keep him for the sponsorship money/not to upset Max...
He was doing OK Sunday until the car died, but surely the rest of the season is beyond recall
Bet it's the sponsorship money. They will lose a chunk of prize money by finishing 3rd in constructors.
It's actually genius by Perez, drive so shit that RB have to keep me to make up for the prize money they have lost.
Somebody tell this joker it's an international organisation, not a theocratic state he's running. I don't see this continuing for much longer.
The car manufacturers need to breakaway with their own series if this happens. It's pure corruption. It's bad enough that we get utterly awful tracks added to the calendar because the higher ups get backhanders ala FIFA
Problem is trying to convince a Ferrari to do the same given their special status in F1. Or at least I presume they are still receiving their heritage bonus. Wouldn't mind seeing another blowup between the teams and F1 to put pressure on the organization but so far it seems like it's mostly drivers willing to lob criticism.The car manufacturers need to breakaway with their own series if this happens. It's pure corruption. It's bad enough that we get utterly awful tracks added to the calendar because the higher ups get backhanders ala FIFA
The sport is being ruined. MBS is a utter disaster and needs to go. Who would have thought that Bernie and Max were the leaders the sport needed?
I really wish billionaires in general would just feck the feck off from sport.
It's not quite that simple. The FIA hold the sporting rights to F1 and Liberty Media the commercial rights. The FIA hold the rights to the name for example.Wouldn't it depend on the commercial rights holder to F1 (Liberty Media) being in agreeance with the breakaway for it to be worthwhile? I'm not sure what prestige a new championship would realistically hold without the name. Add on top of that I'm sure there'll be a multitude of clauses within the track contracts that will protect them.
The FIA as far as I'm aware is just the governing body, and much like in the Max Moseley FIA era I'm sure it's just a play by them to wiggle more power within the F1 gravy train.
Simple then: we'll just call it Fast 1It's not quite that simple. The FIA hold the sporting rights to F1 and Liberty Media the commercial rights. The FIA hold the rights to the name for example.
Simple then: we'll just call it Fast 1
It's not quite that simple. The FIA hold the sporting rights to F1 and Liberty Media the commercial rights. The FIA hold the rights to the name for example.
The concorde agreement, well latest one was signed in 2021 and is due to expire at end of next season. It's a collective negotiation with all the team principals attending as a single bloc. If you ever wanted to bend the FIA over the table with their trousers down, renegotiation of of the agreement is the time.If FOM did breakaway from the FIA surely it would void loads of sponsorship and track contracts?
Also, no more Formula 1, but if the teams moved across the name wouldn't matter.
Basically, FIA's brown envelope wasnt big enoughDutch GP has been confirmed until 2026 , then it’s being dropped apparently.
https://www.skysports.com/amp/f1/ne...-home-race-to-drop-off-f1-calendar-after-2026
Unless there is a sprint race, struggling to sell out 3 days, but I thought both would be money earners anywayIt was dropped by Zandvoort themselves, maybe some of our Dutch contingent can comment better but the director of the track was hinting that a VAT rise from the government on live tickets will impact them in the long run. Apparently there was plenty of options provided by F1 to keep them (circuit rotation etc) but they said that in order to start to make money at a race weekend then they need 3 full days of attendance.
I only learned today that Zandvoort and Silverstone are the only races on the calendar that don't have any form of funding support from their local government.