slyadams
Full Member
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2012
- Messages
- 2,463
So in the end Max kept the position running wide, 5 seconds for gaining an advantage ?
Probably 2 for Charlesit's getting to that stage where we need a max DNF to really spice things up.
Team didn’t help with the “ahead at the apex” comment, personally if it’s 50/50 I would tell him to give it back and have another crack.Definitely Norris should have given it back and he would have been able to get past you feel in the next 3 laps. No need to risk it really.
Gravel after the fastest and top speed straight and a deep braking zone? One lock up and there will be problems. It’s that type of set up as to why they moved to run off areas.Austin is a great track but what would make it even better is smoothing out the apex of turn 12 and putting some gravel on the outside to stop any more of that 'two cars running wide' while fighting business.
The star spangled banner?The best anthem.
The best anthem.
Looking forward to the day they drop off the pace.RB are so unlikable
As a team they make a lot of mistakes. You only have to look at the daftness of Russell's penalty to know, today the stewards are not going to be lenient and allow racers to race. Therefore that move should have been immediately, given the place back. Go again at him, you have a few more laps.Team didn’t help with the “ahead at the apex” comment, personally if it’s 50/50 I would tell him to give it back and have another crack.
So are McLaren unfortunately. Stella, Brown and Norris are all regularly acting like cnuts this season. Hardly any likeable teams left tbh. Maybe Williams?RB are so unlikable
AgreedFerrari as a team are quite likeable. They dont have a Toto, a Horner or a Zak Brown so they win easily.
Russell was comfortably inside track limits and yet was penalized.Think the difference was Max was the defending car in that corner whereas George was overtaking and I have tried watching it back but its not entirely clear to me whether George was actually ahead at the apex. Looked very close. Shouldn't really matter that much in my opinion but according to the rules it does. Thought at the time the Russell penalty was very soft anyway and still do. Should be overturned.
Russell asking if max got a penalty for forcing lando off the track
That's why I asked whether Russell was actually ahead at the apex, because if he was then by the rules it would be his corner and he shouldn't have been penalized. If he wasn't, then by the rules the penalty is correct. Though I don't really like these rules because it severely inhibits racing.Russell was comfortably inside track limits and yet was penalized.
Verstappen brakes later and doesn't make the corner, that's the biggest issue for me.
For me, he is exactly as far alongside at the apex as Verstappen was with Norris by braking later than the other car. He makes the corner comfortably while Verstappen doesn't, and still Russell is the one who gets a penalty.That's why I asked whether Russell was actually ahead at the apex, because if he was then by the rules it would be his corner and he shouldn't have been penalized. If he wasn't, then by the rules the penalty is correct. Though I don't really like these rules because it severely inhibits racing.
Fri 25th Oct | Start | |
---|---|---|
Practice 1 | 7:30pm | |
Practice 2 | 11:00pm |
Sat 26th Oct | Start | |
---|---|---|
Practice 3 | 6:30pm | |
Qualifying | 10:00pm |
Sun 27th Oct | Start | |
---|---|---|
Grand Prix | 8:00pm |
Was it Austria? Can't recall either.It's not what people want to hear on but with the rules the penalties given where correct.
The rules where also agreed with input from the drivers/GDPA.
Also can't remember what race it was but there was also a race earlier this season when Norris forced Max off making Max overtake outside track limits and Max was made to hand the place back despite being forced wide.
A problem is that it isn't really applied consistently and/or the rules are too complex. For example, Sainz did to Max what Russell did to Bottas (think it was lap 1 or 2) except Max kept in front after going off. That wasn't investigated. Was that then because he didn't complete the overtake? He didn't gain from pushing someone off whereas Russell did? I don't know. There's so many of these situations, often several per race, and for me it often feels like a lottery whether there will be a penalty or not.Was it Austria? Can't recall either.
But yes you are correct. Because Max is involved it almost naturally gets blown out of proportion. Max is brilliant in the sense that he knows exactly where to push the envelope of the rules in existence. If you read into his comms right after it it makes it sound like what he did was calculated and that he knew the benefit in that situation would be his. We can argue about steward inconsistency all day long like we can with anything human subjectivity based in all sports - but they did appear to apply it by the letter in this case.
That people don't like it because they don't like the driver benefitting is irrelevant. I've seen some people instead focus their efforts on criticizing the rules, and that is the only thing that should be at question if you have issue with that happened. Top drivers know exactly how to push the envelope and it's a challenge for a FIA to determine how far they go into curbing that or not. As others have mentioned elsewhere - at some pt you risk making racing too sterile.
Imagine if one or both drivers would have ended up stuck in gravel there like was the play in some many track battles of the past. People would truly be screaming bloody murder. Many of those same people who say now that gravel is the answer.
I really want Ferrari to win the constructors and Norris to get the championship for something different but I really dislike red bull and I also have no time for Mcclaren since they had trump in their garage.Think there is a decent chance that Ferrari get constructor's title and Max gets the championship leaving McLaren with nothing.
No argument from me there. If the rules aren't applied consistently especially when the letter is followed and the other time it's not - it's not really a rule.A problem is that it isn't really applied consistently and/or the rules are too complex. For example, Sainz did to Max what Russell did to Bottas (think it was lap 1 or 2) except Max kept in front after going off. That wasn't investigated. Was that then because he didn't complete the overtake? He didn't gain from pushing someone off whereas Russell did? I don't know. There's so many of these situations, often several per race, and for me it often feels like a lottery whether there will be a penalty or not.