F1 2021 Season

It's part why the sport is so interesting. You need engineering brilliance, driving talent and strategic thinking.
Its part of the reason i love F1 so much. I have no horse in the race and my eyes were glued to the tv wondering what would happen. 2 different strategies, 2 different types of drivers and 2 totally different style of cars coming head to head in the final laps. If you complaining about that then I really think the sport will never deliver for you
 
Its part of the reason i love F1 so much. I have no horse in the race and my eyes were glued to the tv wondering what would happen. 2 different strategies, 2 different types of drivers and 2 totally different style of cars coming head to head in the final laps. If you complaining about that then I really think the sport will never deliver for you
I dont think it was a complaint because it wasn't entertaining, as I pointed out in my first reply.

Otherwise I agree with you. It was a fantastic race in a very exciting season. So much happening, not only in the top 3.
 
There seems to be a fantasy narrative with some people on here that somehow Max is the underdog this year and has dragged a average RedBull car to greatness. If he was driving a Haas, then that Haas would be challenging for the title as well.

Takes all sorts.

There are multiple supporters of Max in the thread (some who just hate Lewis) who need that to be the narrative in order to make Max inevitably winning the championship more impressive than reality, which is that he's the fastest driver in the fastest car (which is still very impressive).

Still, its a thread that has had a poster list their 3 greatest drivers of all time as Schumacher, Senna, and Verstappen, so pretending the RB is slower is pretty tame in context.
 
There are multiple supporters of Max in the thread (some who just hate Lewis) who need that to be the narrative in order to make Max inevitably winning the championship more impressive than reality, which is that he's the fastest driver in the fastest car (which is still very impressive).

Still, its a thread that has had a poster list their 3 greatest drivers of all time as Schumacher, Senna, and Verstappen, so pretending the RB is slower is pretty tame in context.

Key question is which Schumacher?
 
It's part why the sport is so interesting. You need engineering brilliance, driving talent and strategic thinking.

I just think it's dull. I'd be all for a return to the 50s - no radios, no pitstops, no tyre changing or refuelling, just cars on track. Driver vs driver, no excesses, no excuses. Strategy and teamwork just muddy the waters.
 
There are multiple supporters of Max in the thread (some who just hate Lewis) who need that to be the narrative in order to make Max inevitably winning the championship more impressive than reality, which is that he's the fastest driver in the fastest car (which is still very impressive).

Still, its a thread that has had a poster list their 3 greatest drivers of all time as Schumacher, Senna, and Verstappen, so pretending the RB is slower is pretty tame in context.
Well based on their second drivers Merc is the quicker car (especially since many rate Perez as a better driver of the 2).
In my opinion Merc and Red Bull are tied, on one track Merc is quicker, on another Red Bull is quicker.

Given how unlucky Verstappen was during this season basically DNF-ing 3 times without doing anything wrong, racing against one of the best drivers of all time in as quick car as he is, winning a championship would be impressive without any doubt.
 
Well based on their second drivers Merc is the quicker car (especially since many rate Perez as a better driver of the 2).
In my opinion Merc and Red Bull are tied, on one track Merc is quicker, on another Red Bull is quicker.

Given how unlucky Verstappen was during this season basically DNF-ing 3 times without doing anything wrong, racing against one of the best drivers of all time in as quick car as he is, winning a championship would be impressive without any doubt.

The second driver thing is a smokescreen, Bottas has had years to learn the Merc whereas Perez is in his first year in a car that's set up entirely for Max's driving style, which really doesn't suit him.

The Red Bull has been the faster car for the majority of the season, bar a few races. There's no shame in that, the best car always delivers the champion, and Max has driven it brilliantly bar a few overly impetuous moments.
 
Andretti Autosport has reportedly walked away from a deal to take a majority interest in Sauber, a move that has likely brought an end to the American motorsport enterprise's ambitions of entering F1, at least in the near term.

According to reports, Andretti was set to acquire an 80% stake in Islero Investments, the entity owned by Swedish Billionaire Finn Rausing which owns Sauber Motorsport and its prime asset, the Alfa Romeo F1 team.

The two parties had apparently agreed on a purchase price for the 80% holding in Islero. However, Rausing also reportedly sought a five-year $50m-a-year payment to guarantee Sauber's presence on the grid in F1 to counter any potential future shortfall in sponsorship.

It is believed that Andretti baulked at the latter demand which came late in the day during the negotiations between the two parties. The condition suddenly put an unrealistic and stratospheric valuation on the Swiss outfit as far as Andretti was concerned.
 


Some more explanation of next years aero.


Really interesting insights into the 2022 F1 regulations and their potential effects. Even more interesting is going to be how the teams push the boundaries in order to maximise the opportunities.
 
Cringe....

Why cringe. It was all about the children, not Lewis Hamilton.
You only have to look at their faces to see the effect on them.
Why do we always criticise attempts to inspire the next generation.
 
To be fair, I think Brawn acknowledges that they have got a lot wrong with the format and some of the quotes in the article go some ay to improving the idea.

Brawn said that the decision to award pole position to the winner of the sprint race rather than the fastest driver over one lap was a mistake and that this had "clearly not been popular" with fans and drivers.

Among other matters likely to change are increasing the number of points available to enhance the drivers' desire to attack and race.

Brawn said he wants to increase the points on offer from the current three-two-one for the top three to an equivalent of about one-third of the points awarded for the main grand prix, and to a larger number of drivers.

Another option is to separate out the 'sprint' completely and make it a stand-alone event, by making qualifying set the grid for the grand prix as normal and decide the sprint-race grid another way.

Brawn said that while he was keen to introduce grids in reverse championship order for this, he felt that would "perhaps be a step too far" next year.

Removing the idea of the sprint race being for position in the main race and even reverse-grid in the long term would make it more sustainable. My main problem with it was how it affected the main race - it should be an event on its own.
 
when verstappen blacked up it was a big deal but it’s fine when lewis does it. typical british fans.
 
To be fair, I think Brawn acknowledges that they have got a lot wrong with the format and some of the quotes in the article go some ay to improving the idea.



Removing the idea of the sprint race being for position in the main race and even reverse-grid in the long term would make it more sustainable. My main problem with it was how it affected the main race - it should be an event on its own.
Bingo. at least they’re listening, this would be a lot better.

points across top 10

no relevance to the race itself, just let them go at it for points and an award.

i’d feel a lot more comfortable with that.
 
Bingo. at least they’re listening, this would be a lot better.

points across top 10

no relevance to the race itself, just let them go at it for points and an award.

i’d feel a lot more comfortable with that.
Doing a sprint race with the reverse grid from the seasons standings would be amazing. (Could use average qualification position for ties.) No-one would want to game that and it would mean chances for the smaller teams of points and lots of action of the big names overtaking their way forwards from the back.
 
Why cringe. It was all about the children, not Lewis Hamilton.
You only have to look at their faces to see the effect on them.
Why do we always criticise attempts to inspire the next generation.
Exactly, show them that maybe they too can grow up to become rich and famous and shelter all their money overseas to avoid paying taxes in their own country.
loooooooooolz the vid was nice
 
Exactly, show them that maybe they too can grow up to become rich and famous and shelter all their money overseas to avoid paying taxes in their own country.
loooooooooolz the vid was nice

With respect, it was nothing at all like that. But you must think what you must think.
 
Not seen one executed in the F1 thread for some time, well done.:lol:

the-office-bow.gif
 
They should leave qualifying alone - the standard 3 session format is perfect.

If they wanted to do gimmicks, a better way would be to give 10-9-8-7-6-5-4-3-2-1 points for 'qualifying', then start every race as reverse grid.
 
I'd make one change to qualifying. The tyres for Q3 (your fastest lap) are the ones you start the race with. That would put the cat amongst the pigeons. Do you go for grid slot on SOFTS or think about the race and less stops and go for MEDIUMS etc.

Top teams would hate the idea.
 
What about the driver who can set the longest tyre burn outs get pole
 
I'd make one change to qualifying. The tyres for Q3 (your fastest lap) are the ones you start the race with. That would put the cat amongst the pigeons. Do you go for grid slot on SOFTS or think about the race and less stops and go for MEDIUMS etc.

Top teams would hate the idea.

That used to be how it worked.

What about the driver who can set the longest tyre burn outs get pole

Longest continuous donuts before suffering a blowout gets 5 bonus points.
 
Mexican GP FP 1
Mexico City Practice One Timesheet
DriverTeamTime
1) Valtteri BottasMercedes1:18.341
2) Lewis HamiltonMercedes+0.076
3) Max VerstappenRed Bull+0.123
4) Sergio PerezRed Bull+0.269
5) Pierre GaslyAlphaTauri+0.644
6) Carlos SainzFerrari+1.122
7) Fernando AlonsoAlpine+1.315
8) Charles LeclercFerrari+1.326
9) Esteban OconAlpine+1.418
10) Sebastian VettelAston Martin+1.517
11) Yuki TsunodaAlphaTauri+1.670
12) Kimi RaikkonenAlfa Romeo+1.685
13) Lance StrollAston Martin+1.689
14) Daniel RicciardoMcLaren+1.932
15) Lando NorrisMcLaren+1.960
16) Antonio GiovinazziAlfa Romeo+2.003
17) George RussellWilliams+2.176
18) Nicholas LatifiWilliams+3.239
19) Mick SchumacherHaas+3.803
20) Nikita MazepinHaas+4.478