What bollocks. I can only think you have not actually watched him on Sky, his passion and honesty are incontestible.Gary Neville is minding his own investments, you sheep. His Salford City project depends on the big clubs staying and not messing up the payment structure.
'I don't like them and they don't like me, but'Well in Gary - best part was when he took a shot at the scouse.
That would never happen, as the national associations and UEFA would be completely opposed. The Champions League and Europa League already exist for competition across national borders. This would be very different: the breakaway clubs would have to resign from UEFA and go it alone, leaving their national leagues.Of course, this can only happen based on two things:
1) United (and the rest of the big 6 clubs) negotiate with the PL to also play there, along with staying in the Carabao Cup and FA Cup. The European Super League becoming the main league for us (and everyone else signing up) would be stupid to say the least. We are an English club, Barcelona are a Spanish club, Juve Italian etc etc.
2) There is a yearly qualification for the European Super League, thus sides like Leicester, Everton and West Ham can still make it. Otherwise, the top end of the PL, aside from winning it, would be absolutely pointless.
If this criteria is met, then it’s fine. I’ll be indifferent to it. It’s basically just us playing the likes of Real and Barcelona in both halves of the season instead of just the second.
Agree 100%I honestly think this is going to instigate a real downturn on football popularity.
Spot on. I’ve never been so ashamed of my club.Gary Neville spot on. Disgraceful from Liverpool, Arsenal and Utd - the pinnacle of English football.
Yeah I'd be fairly distrustful of outrage from those who have a vested interest in the status quo.
It's what I thought of when I heard how angry Neville was on commentary about it.
The move would be to make the PL an 18 or 16 team league, which what UEFA wanted at one stage anyway!They seem to be assuming this is instead of the Premier league just because it has the word "league" in the title.
You're not going to have a mere 18 game season surely.
How they'd work it in with 38 games in the league on top I do not know though.
The biggest luddite attitude to change is the belief it is also needed and always good.I’ll keep my powder dry until we see the detail behind this.
I won’t spare a tear for the death of the top four race every season at the expense of interest in domestic cups and just proving yourself in the domestic league. My understanding from what I have read is that this is more of a threat to the CL, rather than the domestic leagues. Why does the CL have to be the premier continental competition?
People have to be careful not to take a luddite attitude to change. The Football League was against any English teams even competing in European competitions initially.
I’d be pretty aghast if this turns out to be Manchester United no longer wanting to play English domestic football though.
So what? Hasn't it been demonstrated that it costs the city money? So if the city residents know this and they vote against it, then I see no problem.
And even so, this proposal takes everything that's bad about UEFA and cranks it up to 11.To those who says ”but UEFA is bad to”. Well, UEFA isn’t perfect but who are giving money to smaller federations? To even say that they are on same level as this proposed fake league is so far from the truth.
American sports disagrees.
I don't like the idea of this league, but as you say Sky have driven the money grabbing culture.Hate this and hate the concept, but Sky acting so scandalised and upset after their own heavy involvement in the current state of football as such a money driven machine can do one. They're just panicking they'll be losing some of their cut
Hate this and hate the concept, but Sky acting so scandalised and upset after their own heavy involvement in the current state of football as such a money driven machine can do one. They're just panicking they'll be losing some of their cut
am I right though that there is no cap on what players get paid? so the money saved in one way goes in another. I think the top QBs get way more than most PL players but I could be wrongA max wage budget and especially max season transfer spend could easily be implemented right now and not at all affect the rest of the game as a whole. Don't you agree? Lets say that teams can only spend 100m a season. Thats doable isn't it, if you care about fairness? Some teams could afford the whole 100m, others couldn't but it creates a more level playing field.
Can somebody explain to me how this is even a thing when virtually everyone is against it?? If Man United (or any club for that matter) were to turn their back on the fans in this manner, I would never forgive them.
Yeah sure, players are suddenly gonna choose to play for Sheffield United instead of Barcelona, and get paid 5 times less cause they might not play in a World Cup.
Yep! All 3 clubs should hang their heads in shame.Gary Neville spot on. Disgraceful from Liverpool, Arsenal and Utd - the pinnacle of English football.
Well said - ban Mansour. Glazers outPremier League had this coming when they let Abramovich, Glazers, Henry, Mansour and all these foreign owners come in. You can have your growth with them pumping money in but eventually they’ll have the power.
rqueghpruighr9-qeughrtguthjguehoqrgjbpr8yfv-q4Take off your anti-neville specs.
What does their nationality have to do with it?
Sky as in who? Neville? He's not Sky. He works for them currently, but he's a football man through and through.
Hate this and hate the concept, but Sky acting so scandalised and upset after their own heavy involvement in the current state of football as such a money driven machine can do one. They're just panicking they'll be losing some of their cut
Yeah I'd be fairly distrustful of outrage from those who have a vested interest in the status quo.
It's what I thought of when I heard how angry Neville was on commentary about it.
What you are talking about isn't fairness but equality which isn't how football has ever worked, football has never been fair. Two cities with vastly different populations can't operate with the same budgets unless you artificially create equality which isn't fair for the one that is bigger and wealthier. To be clear I like US sports and their socialist() structure but it's based on varsity teams and the fact that they essentially get the best young players for free while barely spending resources on their developments, professional sports in the US are a business for billionaires and easy way to make hundreds of millions per year. So it's important for them to have an equalitarian system in a closed league because that's where the excitement come from the fact that the worst team can climb the ranks by adding the best rookies to their teams.
The point is that we have been here before with people up in arms about change in football. Senior English footballing stakeholders have a terrible track record in supporting the development of the elite game. If it was up to England, there would have been no World Cup, have been no Euros, have been no European club competitions.The biggest luddite attitude to change is the belief it is also needed and always good.
And Invested in the Salford City project that is currently buying their way towards the Premier League.