European Super League

Do you want the ESL to happen?


  • Total voters
    1,921
  • Poll closed .
t's also a bit rich of Sky to be taking the high ground when they helped create this monster in the first place. I'm sure they cared oh-so-much about the little man and grassroots football as they price gouged, globalized, and commercialized English football to hell and back. Spare me. It's not that I disagree with the sentiment, but rather who it's coming from.
Completely agree with you about the hypocrisy of Uefa and Sky.

The fact is that there are no good guys here, just different sets of rich cnuts fighting over money. Whoever wins, it will be normal fans, and football as a whole, who will lose.
The way some politicians and others have been talking today, you’d think Uefa in its current state is some benevolent non-profit, organising jumpers-for-goalposts kick-abouts for orphans, that must be protected against the evils of big business and capitalism
 
Perez interview is essentially "all the most profitable clubs in Europe need to have access to stable levels of money and if the profitable teams are stabilise, everyone will win"

They are actually using the trickle down economics argument. :lol: Even bankers don't say that out loud.:lol:
 
It's already one of first major current events in months that Rashford's PR team haven't weighed in on.

Rashford just launched a book club for disadvantaged kids today..probably has more on his plate then turning on his employers. Fifty thousand books will be distributed to more than 850 primary schools.
 




ROTJ-Palpatine-Grin-700x295.jpg


Seriously, Perez is looking like a proper villain tonight. This may as well be a movie plot at this stage.
 
Imagine running your club so well that you give Gareth fecking Bale 600k a week, refusing to send him and his wage to China and then crying that you're not making enough money after millions of death and thousands of jobs being lost in the paste year. After selling your badge and soul to the Arabs.

Abhorrent people.
 
I could actually see the Lesser 14 forcing the issue by voting to remove the Super Six if they proceed with the idea and all other avenues have been exhausted. Yes the Super Six have the league by the b@llocks in terms of income and hold most of the financial cards, but the Lesser 14 also know that the top six want to remain in domestic competition and that public opinion is also firmly in their favour, including the fanbases and players from the Super Six themselves most critically. For those clubs to carry on with the proposals and no longer be part of the PL pits Liverpool fans directly against FSG, Utd fans against the Glazers, Arsenal fans against Kroenke and so on...significantly moreso than eve before. Civil war with their fanbases is not what the Super Six will want. Massive game of high stakes poker and the risks are obvious, but I for one wouldn‘t be shocked to see it.

It's an existential threat to a lot of clubs, so why not threaten to blow the whole thing up? I think it's exactly the right call for them to make, if the clubs and associations start backing off and looking for compromises then all they're doing is handing even more power to these bastards. Either there's a line drawn in the sand now, or a lot of English clubs are finished.
 
Florentino Perez adamant that players and clubs won't be banned from competitions this season


 
Perez interview is essentially "all the most profitable clubs in Europe need to have access to stable levels of money and if the profitable teams are stabilise, everyone will win"

They are actually using the trickle down economics argument. :lol: Even bankers don't say that out loud.:lol:
They are not bankers, they are not economists, they are not politicians. They are just greedy cnuts drunk with power.
 
Save football :lol: This is unadulterated sociopathic trolling.

Funny that seeing football in crisis, with an unsustainable model, the reaction is not to reign things in, but to follow the perpetual growth doctrine by just cutting out the minnows.

The absolute conceit of it. The richest clubs in the world want to break away so they can have even more money to themselves, and this shameless cnut says they want to save football. They are completely out of touch with reality.
 
Rashford just launched a book club for disadvantaged kids today..probably has more on his plate then turning on his employers. Fifty thousand books will be distributed to more than 850 primary schools.

No he didn't...Kelly Hogarth and his other brand managers did. Rashford's name is on it though.
 
I need to keep re-reading the warning at the bottom of the page and do breathing exercises when I see that wrinkly cnut say "We're doing this to save football."
 


Perez knows what he's doing by repeating the "We need to save football" spiel. He's trying to make sure that he and the rest of the ESL are seen as saviours.
 




Only big teams, eh? Did they forget about how both Spurs and Atletico Madrid became big clubs over the last 10 years?

Have to make football more profitable? So you can afford paying Raiola another billion? And the players? Underpaid wretches, are they?
 
They are nearly bankrupt because they have been run by incompetent men. It has nothing to do with trying to compete with oil clubs.
Nonsense. It’s both. Messi doesn’t earn 1m a week without oil clubs. The absolute refusal of people on here and in the media to not see the correlation between state funded clubs, failure of FFP, refusal to open up media revenue to individual clubs and what is now taking place is truly mad.
 
No he didn't...Kelly Hogarth and his other brand managers did. Rashford's name is on it though.

It was at his direction and something he is quite passionate about given he is leveraging his own experience growing up. But yeah I doubt he was driving the books into the schools today himself.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-56798010

Let's not be pricks about kids getting books.

I don't really care if Rashford doesn't speak out against the Super League yet, he's done enough good in the world.
 
Nonsense. It’s both. Messi doesn’t earn 1m a week without oil clubs. The absolute refusal of people on here and in the media to not see the correlation between state funded clubs, failure of FFP, refusal to open up media revenue to individual clubs and what is now taking place is truly mad.

Nonsense? So why no other player come close to that? Why Atletico didn't pay Griezmann nearly as much as Barcelona did? Do they count as oil clubs?
 
Will we pay 250 quid a month subscription?

The only way that this supercunt league is feasible is if we pay for it.

I'm done.
Sick to the stomach
 
Florentino Perez on Ceferin: "We don't want a president who insults another president"
 
That would mainly mean lower transfer fees and lower wages, which would be a great thing. Ticket prices could be reduced and TV companies wouldn't be able to charge as much for games.

What's more the Super League clubs would all be playing weakened teams in the league, wanting their best players ready for midweek European games. The league would become like the Carling Cup to the 'big six'.

We mustn't think we are indispensable and can therefore do whatever we like without consequences. The breakaway clubs have taken the nuclear option, which could mean everything is destroyed.

If the clubs press ahead with this disgraceful idea, we will all deserve everything we get. We all, together, have to stop the Super League.

I think they will come to some compromise otherwise the PL will turn into the Championship and the current PL clubs have massive financial commitments which they would not be able to meet if the TV companies pulled the plug. Relegated teams I believe have £100m parachute payments at present, if all that disappeared there could be a lot of clubs going to the wall.
 
Florentino Perez: "If PSG and Bayern Munich refuse, The Super League will not be cancelled"


So where will they find the 3 other founders from?
 


Klopp's making a bit of a gobshite out of himself here. We have the rights to it? Is he trying to say no one else can mention YAWN? Ffs


Nonsense. It’s both. Messi doesn’t earn 1m a week without oil clubs. The absolute refusal of people on here and in the media to not see the correlation between state funded clubs, failure of FFP, refusal to open up media revenue to individual clubs and what is now taking place is truly mad.

They didn't actually have to pay him that much though. They chose to.
 


His assurances are somewhat dubious given that he is in no position to give any assurances about that!



If you replace the word "football" with the words "Real Madrid" in that statement, you get the actual motivation for this action.

Madrid and Barca are in financial trouble - they need this super league, not to save football, but to save themselves.
 
Who let this guy answer interview questions :lol:

I don't mind the super league and even I think he basically talks like a bond villain.
 
At least this rules out Napoli and Roma as two of the three remaining founding members.
 
Nonsense? So why no other player come close to that? Why Atletico didn't pay Griezmann nearly as much as Barcelona did? Do they count as oil clubs?
Yes. It’s absolute nonsense to think PSG paying 360m for two fecking players hasn’t inflated the market. That PSG and City offering Messi a blank cheque hasn’t inflated his wages. It’s also total hypocritical nonsense to think it’s equitable and fair to allow state funded clubs to spend whatever the feck they want whilst saying to traditional clubs you have to share your media revenue equally. You either enforce FFP or open up media revenues to traditional clubs allowing them to compete. Otherwise you get the clusterfeck situation football now finds itself in.
 
Stretford End Flags poll whether Old Trafford banners should be removed until United withdraw from The Super League
 
What a mess. The future of football doesn't seem too bright right now. And to be fair, UEFA and FIFA played a big part on this. If they had financial fair play rules that actually did something, this would not have happened IMO.