FujiVice
Full Member
- Joined
- May 8, 2013
- Messages
- 7,714
Their billionaire owners are. The clubs sold their souls to these parasites years ago.This is just awful. Big clubs are keen on destroying football.
Their billionaire owners are. The clubs sold their souls to these parasites years ago.This is just awful. Big clubs are keen on destroying football.
Why would we even want to be in this? We have no ambition. Imagine how embarrassing this would be to play in and never compete.
Glazers are a joke
The UEFA and domestic leagues does not have anything to threaten with.
What will PL be without the 6 big clubs? A glorified championship at best.
What would La Liga be without Real, Barca and Athletico. Not even better than the Portuguese league.
What would Serie A be without Milan, Inter and Juventus?
Banning players from Euros? Who is gonna watch second 11's compete in Euros?
They have no choice but to bend over.
United should have had a much bigger share of the pie down the years and had our pick of the best players like Bayern, Real, Barca in their leagues.
The ESL allows this concentration of wealth as well as caters to each individual clubs selling some of their TV rights themselves.
That "could be" part is interesting. I won't be surprised if UEFA is bribed and they allows this.Strong statement from UEFA, that.
https://theathletic.com/news/european-super-league-premier-league/i5ilPK1rFttII don't think City are. From what I can tell, in January, Pep said he didn't want them to join and reports today are that City didn't sign up for the Super League.
If that's true, that City didn't, and United did, then feck me.
This is my question too. If they're left out of this then it'll ruin their entire projectJust feels like deja vu and we've heard it all before.
Are the oil clubs invited?
K don't agree with the points deduction because Manchester United the entity have no control over what the Glazers do
This is my question too. If they're left out of this then it'll ruin their entire project
Hmmm. If it's just replacing the CL and actually has the effect of neutering the oil clubs to reasonable levels then there's definitely an upside.
Domestic leagues would be my major concern. Firstly in terms of whether the long term plan would be to replace those leagues but also the impact not having CL places providing incentive would have.
Given the timing in regards to CL plans though, you'd have to wonder how much of this is to do with pressure for reforms.
The only fair format for the CL was binned years ago when the champions weren't invited anymore champions and their friends were the order of the day. Only from the biggest leagues and then 3-4 teams. Don't see the difference in the 4 seat or the 10th to be fair. The thing is money won years ago.So you mean Arsenal finish tenth in the league or Liverpool in sixth but they deserve to play in the top competition in Europe because of their name? In what world is that a better format?
Of course the yanks are at the centre of this, America hates genuine fair competition, everything has to be a monopoly when they get their mucky paws on it. I’m sick to my stomach that my club is not only part of it but a driving force behind it.
I disagree.
Salary caps and the draft system in American sports is a brilliant leveller, IMO.
Exactly. And if they'd implemented FFP with any seriousness, I highly doubt this would have happened.I disagree with it, but feck UEFA too. They only care because it’s not their competition.
https://theathletic.com/news/european-super-league-premier-league/i5ilPK1rFttI
the athletic say City are one of the club.
Your point of United basically subsidising half the prem is funny, when it would be the likes of us being subsidised by Real and Barca when we are finishing mid table every year, those 2 clubs never do anything for the good of anyone else we would end up being fecked.I'm more a United fan than a football fan