kouroux
45k posts to finally achieve this tagline
Tchh tchhThat show is awesome!
Tchh tchhThat show is awesome!
Right now Leicester can get top 4 and get into the UCL and compete financially with the bigger clubs for a bit, with this it may be impossible for them to ever do so.
6 clubs making obscene money and even if you win the PL you're not in the club.
I mean Arsenal are sat in 9th right now so wouldnt even make that. Yet here they are with a guranteed seat at the table. Nothing should be guranteed, it should be earned. They could finish 9th every season from now on and it wouldn't affect them. That has to be damaging for the League, your richest clubs not giving a shit.Fair point but how's it destroying the other clubs? We are assuming the top teams will not take the top 4 battle seriously which may or may not be correct.
Now, isn't UEFA new proposal all about making about 6 teams in CL ? Doesn't that yield the same result? We are pretty much guaranteed top 6 anyway. So what's the difference?
Who's played in any unsanctioned competition this season?Based on the Premier League having to agree for any of its members to be able to play in another competition.
All good and well but the guy you're replying to is right. Without the big clubs, the league's are dead. Money from tv rights will dry up and the league's will die. The FA's have literally no choice.Your nickname says all we need to know about your bias in this situation but let me try to 'discuss'.
First, the PL is not La Liga where people care only for the two big clubs with a sprinkling with Sevilla and Atletico (not Athletico btw) Madrid (who both inevitably bottle the league to the former two in 9/10 cases).
The PL is built on equal distribution of money which allows for excitement in most games and unpredictability of the outcome each season(title, top 4, relegation). We have already seen that allowing Citeh to spend their way to a league title makes the league winner less unpredictable/exciting. Why should crap teams like Spuds and Arsenal get to benefit from big money when they've proven they're not good enough to compete with West Ham and Leicester?
Secondly, I would prefer to watch crappy little teams than these plastic big clubs owned by Yanks in a league facilitated by Yank banks (JP Morgan, please). Americans have proven time and again they have no understanding of European football in relation to its meaning to fans and communities, so I don't want them to have even an ounce more influence on European football.
I have a silly question: Can the league retro-actively declare that owners of a premier league club don't pass the "Fit and Proper" test anymore and have to therefore sell the club?
Robot Referees with 360 degree cameras allowing 3D VAR tech to the MM. I like it!VAR 3d
Where were you why Sky and the Big Five broke away from the old Division One?
If there are weakened teams, it's an opportunity for small clubs to close the gap right? Isn't UEFA already planning for.a top 6 CL anyway ?Imagine those 6 teams getting hundreds of millions every year more than the other PL teams.
And imagine a season like this one where City have walked it and the other 5 don't even need to chase a Champions League spot. Weakened teams being fielded most weeks, no interesting games to broadcast, star players not being used etc.
Clattenburg will just referee all of them.What will they do about referees and VAR?
Will they have their own set of crack super referees?
Selfish 6I reckon there'll a fair few broken legs in the Premier League if the Sinister Six are allowed to stay.
Yeah, just in UK probably . No one is watching West Ham vs Leicester , the PL title decider by waking up 4 AM or staying late until 12 AM To see the match (which is what's happening now)
Shameless Six is also a nice one.Selfish 6
This thread is a mess.
Any danger of threadmarks FFS
"They are just maximising the clubs revenue potential" by essentially ending the competition our players literally died fighting for.It's not 300m a season. Its one time.payment of 300m with 100m yearly payments. Again, isn't it just like another sponsor? They are just maximizing the club's revenue potential.
The PL will stay like the same way they are doing it now. It will still be having the same broadcasting rights which guarantees the money to small clubs, isn't it ?
The modern human, a soulless mindless automaton. Programmed to consume products brought to you by huge empty corporations who care nothing for human rights violations and only their bottom end.
It's cnuts like you that have given these owners the impetus to push for a ESL.
You'd consume Arsenic if Amazon were fecking promoting it.
^ Exactly top 4 becomes pointless. This season in particular shows how entertaining it can be when one club (City) runs away with the league but still the competition for Champions League places is in flow between like 6-7 others teams. Exciting to watch, now we'll have 6 teams in some European Super League (guaranteed) not arsed about where they finish in the PL unless it's 1st. Playing in a rotation of teams year on year. Non-knockout style.We've spent the last years in a top 4 race that's kept things entertaining. What would we have been competing for then and Liverpool now if we were already guaranteed European football?
It massively damages the EPL product.
If the remaining 14 clubs are happy to share a TV deal about 15-20% of the last one.Not when they all have 5x the revenue of every other team, it will turn it into a complete procession every year. I know you could make an argument that it already is, but at least with the equitable sharing of TV money there is some semblance of competition.
If the remaining 14 clubs move for expulsion then its a possibility for sure.
Who's played in any unsanctioned competition this season?
Close what gap? These clubs will be getting a hundred million more than the others every season so can outspend them when signing players, they will have a guranteed spot in this competition that the likes of Leicester and West Ham won't have, it's a rigged game. So Leicester get into the Champions league which is missing the biggest teams and inevitably earn less? There is no scenario where clubs can close the gap, this is a system they've come up to ensure these same 12 teams are all that matters and cannot be replaced.If there are weakened teams, it's an opportunity for small clubs to close the gap right? Isn't UEFA already planning for.a top 6 CL anyway ?
This is my biggest issue with it honestly, watching Arsenal flail around in mid table and looking forward to them being out of Europe has been a real highlight for me and now the Super League is spoiling my fun.I mean Arsenal are sat in 9th right now so wouldnt even make that. Yet here they are with a guranteed seat at the table. Nothing should be guranteed, it should be earned. They could finish 9th every season from now on and it wouldn't affect them. That has to be damaging for the League, your richest clubs not giving a shit.
But they will have a better chance to be in european competitions so maybe can boost their income that wayIf the remaining 14 clubs are happy to share a TV deal about 15-20% of the last one.
Leeds, villa and everton are arguably bigger clubs than 3 of the teams going into this super league. They’ll rise to the top again and hopefully Man city and a few others will be forgotten about again. I’m just gutted United are mixed in and pushing it all.All good and well but the guy you're replying to is right. Without the big clubs, the league's are dead. Money from tv rights will dry up and the league's will die. The FA's have literally no choice.
To me it seems like FIFA and UEFA are threatened at losing their own monopoly
UEFA is the most powerful block in FIFA and Blatter had problems with them previously, these clubs have made a coup on UEFA and the cynic in me thinks that FIFA will soon betray UEFA and give legitimacy to ESL. There is too much money and too many cnuts involved for this block to hold out.
Liverpool and Manchester United are in talks about a bombshell plot involving Europe's biggest football clubs to join a new FIFA-backed tournament that would reshape the sport's global landscape.
Sky News has learned that financiers are assembling a $6 billion (£4.6 billion) funding package to assist the creation of what could become known as the European Premier League.
More than a dozen teams from England, France, Germany, Italy and Spain are in negotiations about becoming founder members of the competition.
As many as five English clubs could sign up to join it, with a provisional start date said to have been discussed as early as 2022.
Yes I think. Pes doesn't have the licenses anyway. This would kill the Fifa franchise , they're already losing the battle.Wouldn't this hurt the game more than anything else? Big chance for Konami though with PES.
A European competition with less prize money and smaller tv deals.But they will have a better chance to be in european competitions so maybe can boost their income that way
I reckon there'll a fair few broken legs in the Premier League if the Sinister Six are allowed to stay.
Close what gap? These clubs will be getting a hundred million more than the others every season so can outspend them when signing players, they will have a guranteed spot in this competition that the likes of Leicester and West Ham won't have, it's a rigged game. So Leicester get into the Champions league which is missing the biggest teams and inevitably earn less? There is no scenario where clubs can close the gap, this is a system they've come up to ensure these same 12 teams are all that matters and cannot be replaced.
The selfish 6 cannot have this superleage and remain in the EPL, that is something that cannot happen, for the reasons already listed in this thread. Their team selections in midweek would be favoured towards a more lucrative competion, whilst resting players in the EPL where they are not bothered where they finish. This would ruin the integrity and fair play of the league.A European competition with less prize money and smaller tv deals.