EU Referendum | UK residents vote today.

Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the EU?


  • Total voters
    653
Status
Not open for further replies.
Why do you think its unlikely within the next 20 years? They will soon likely have Visa free travel and joining the EU probably wont be far behind. If they want to join and the EU wants them in as it appears they do with their ever expanding empire then it will be long before 20 years.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-35832035

Read it all and you have to conclude there is no chance of Turkish accession for the foreseeable future.

Back to what I posted earlier really, Leave seem to have no leadership, they don't have anyone capable of directing them away from arguments that they have failed in, they just keep repeating the same mistakes like groundhog day.
 
The issue of continued centralisation of power in the west mainly but also the entire world is not mentioned enough in this debate. I have mentioned it earlier in this thread as one of the main reasons I will be voting to leave the EU.

More and more power to fewer and fewer elites controling the system, with problems never being solved as they don't impact these elites. It means less people power and less democracy. Less independence for nations to make their own decisions, less sovereignty and power for each country so the system can be controlled more easily by those at the top. Leaving the EU would be a small blow to this power structure that is ever expanding and I see that as a good thing.

It is mentioned here and I agree completely:

 
Last edited:
I'm shocked that the odds are so in favour of Remain - I work in retail and my boss gets into discussions with lots of customers every day about the referendum (he is fiercley Brexit) and I have yet to even see a customer who is for remaining.

I am in favour of Remain, personally (not that I am very passionate about it - I don't think it makes much difference - and like someone else said, this seems to be mostly an ideological battle).

But I think the polls/bookies are getting this massively wrong (like they did at the general election) - I think anti-immigration sentiments amongst the working-class traditional Labour voters is much more prominent than people realise and I think we will see a bigger turnout than is expected.

I think mainstream political ideology has shifted right (like many commentators have suggested) and not many traditional Labour voters retain the old Socialist, humanist values - they have grown older, more centrist and in many cases a kind of closet-fascist masked as mildly conservative/nationalist.

As in the Scottish referendum, undecideds generally break for the status quo. People who are interested in leaving are also much more vocal, at least from an outsider's perspective.
 
The issue of continued centralisation of power in the west mainly but also the entire world is not mentioned enough in this debate. I have mentioned it earlier in this thread as one of the main reasons I will be voting to leave the EU.

More and more power to fewer and fewer elites controling the system, with problems never being solved as they don't impact these elites. It means less people power and less democracy. Less independence for nations to make their own decisions, less sovereignty and power for each country so the system can be controlled more easily by those at the top. Leaving the EU would be a small blow to this power structure that is ever expanding and I see that as a good thing.

It is mentioned here and I agree completely:

I quite like technocracy, to be honest.
 
I quite like technocracy, to be honest.
I agree, my favourite group of crats. If you're going to decide who rules I'd rather it was based on their knowledge than their blind obedience to old rules, wealth, self appointed supremacy or regal ancestry.

BringNaniBack clearly prefers his crats from the beaureau, pluto, auto or aristo set though which is curious for a man who is terrified of shape shifting lizards who rule him from their seats of unassailable power.

I know the Americans will keep on insisting that democracy is the only way but let's face it, our common man is generally pretty common and often is incapable of discerning the truth in the electoral process so votes on the same old lines or goes for the biggest clown in the circus. If democracy was so bloody great how have we managed to end up with Cameron again and how have the likes of Johnson, Trump, Farage and Le Pen even got close enough to the main stage to be heard.

Sometimes it's reassuring to know that the guy setting the rules actually knows something about the topic at hand.
 
The common man usually votes based on one issue. When i was a lad it was all about nuclear weapons.

People usually vote for the same old crap cos theyre scared of change, then they moan about it for 5 years and elect the same goon. And again the elites will get more and the scum will get less.

We will never have true equality until we all have nothing.
 
So, this thing's causing a stir...

_89792657_obv.jpg


Operation Black Vote has released what it calls a "hard-hitting" poster urging black and ethnic minority voters to take part in the EU referendum.

It features "an elderly Asian British woman being berated by an aggressive thug", according to Operation Black Vote's description.

The campaign says it is meant to show everyone has the same voting power.

But UKIP leader Nigel Farage described it as a "disgusting" example of "sectarian politics".

And he accused Operation Black Vote, who he said he had previously supported, of "trying to divide society". "I want to engage people in all communities to get involved in our democracy but I'm afraid this poster is a really big mistake," he said.

Magnus Djaba, chief executive of Saatchi and Saatchi London, the ad agency which created the poster, said: "This is a message about democracy, not a message about race. Whichever community you're from, it hits home."

Mixed feelings, myself. I think the point that some little old British Asian granny's voice will count as much as anyone else's is a point worth making. That said, it's hard not think we are to assume Granny is voting 'in' and the young man pointing aggressively at her is voting 'leave' - so it is encouraging the idea that those who wish to leave the EU are just racist scum - which is bollocks. I mean, don't get me wrong, I'm pretty sure the racist scum are voting 'leave' but I'd like to think even us rather determined 'remainers' are aware that for the vast majority of 'leavers' it's not about race.
 
Because Asian grannies are Black, right? I don't think the Asian grannies I know would quite agree with that.
Stupid name for a stupid racist organisation, people should be respected as individuals, not categories.
 
Last edited:
The common man usually votes based on one issue. When i was a lad it was all about nuclear weapons.

People usually vote for the same old crap cos theyre scared of change, then they moan about it for 5 years and elect the same goon. And again the elites will get more and the scum will get less.

We will never have true equality until we all have nothing.

So vote leave and make a chance!
 
So, this thing's causing a stir...

_89792657_obv.jpg




Mixed feelings, myself. I think the point that some little old British Asian granny's voice will count as much as anyone else's is a point worth making. That said, it's hard not think we are to assume Granny is voting 'in' and the young man pointing aggressively at her is voting 'leave' - so it is encouraging the idea that those who wish to leave the EU are just racist scum - which is bollocks. I mean, don't get me wrong, I'm pretty sure the racist scum are voting 'leave' but I'd like to think even us rather determined 'remainers' are aware that for the vast majority of 'leavers' it's not about race.

Yep that's exactly what its doing. Trying to imply leave voters are all racist skin heads, which obviously isn't the case. If you vote leave you are a racist :rolleyes:.
 
So, this thing's causing a stir...

_89792657_obv.jpg




Mixed feelings, myself. I think the point that some little old British Asian granny's voice will count as much as anyone else's is a point worth making. That said, it's hard not think we are to assume Granny is voting 'in' and the young man pointing aggressively at her is voting 'leave' - so it is encouraging the idea that those who wish to leave the EU are just racist scum - which is bollocks. I mean, don't get me wrong, I'm pretty sure the racist scum are voting 'leave' but I'd like to think even us rather determined 'remainers' are aware that for the vast majority of 'leavers' it's not about race.

Worse still the idea that using divisive racist campaigning is plain wrong and won't work, ( the Z G London Mayoral lesson ) is now undermined.

I can't believe this gets through a common sense test.
 
Don't agree with anything racist but Farage accusing other people of dividing society is a bit rich.

Four weeks to the vote and still awaiting a genuine reason why Leave want to leave (that isn't a pack of lies or fantasy)

I don't think convicted prisoners serving time in prison should be allowed to vote. I don't think the EU should be deciding against and overruling the expressed wishes of the democratically elected representatives of the UK's people that it has to let them.

Vote leave and I'd bet that it doesn't happen. As much as it irks me I won't decide on this relatively small but symbolic issue but it is a genuine reason and concern, it points to major problems in the way the EU works and its incontrovertibly true. So you can stop repeating the part in bold?
 
According to Evan Davis on the BBC Newsnight two polls released tonight put leave level or one point ahead. Can't remember which except one was UGov.
 
I don't think convicted prisoners serving time in prison should be allowed to vote. I don't think the EU should be deciding against and overruling the expressed wishes of the democratically elected representatives of the UK's people that it has to let them.

Vote leave and I'd bet that it doesn't happen. As much as it irks me I won't decide on this relatively small but symbolic issue but it is a genuine reason and concern, it points to major problems in the way the EU works and its incontrovertibly true. So you can stop repeating the part in bold?

I know what the reason is and it's nothing to do with trade, laws, undemocratic processes or anything of the like , as these on the whole have all been disproven. There is only one thing on the agenda and no-one will come out from Brexit and say it directly, they just hide behind this other nonsense which in the main is totally untrue or wishful thinking, but the average person does not know this.
 
Don't agree with anything racist but Farage accusing other people of dividing society is a bit rich.

Four weeks to the vote and still awaiting a genuine reason why Leave want to leave (that isn't a pack of lies or fantasy)

Four weeks to the vote and still awaiting a genuine reason why Remain want to Remain (that hasn't been scare mongering)

Plague, Tsunamis, North Korea, WW3, Certain Death
 
still awaiting a genuine reason why Leave want to leave
*genuine reason*
I know what the reason is and it's blah blah blah
Can't think why people aren't interested in giving you their reasons...
Four weeks to the vote and still awaiting a genuine reason why Remain want to Remain (that hasn't been scare mongering)

Plague, Tsunamis, North Korea, WW3, Certain Death
Free movement of people is my main one.
 
You mean if UK exit you will be imprisoned there? Not allowed to leave its shores?
Got friends from Europe that would be unlikely to get visas, if they had to apply for such. I don't really want them to have to marry random people just to stay and work here.
 
I have colleagues from Serbia that got UK work visas easily, don't see it as an issue
What jobs are they doing though? Because my friends working shifts at restaurants, whilst they study, aren't exactly falling in to the 'necessary skills' bracket at present.
 
Can't think why people aren't interested in giving you their reasons...
Free movement of people is my main one.

People have tried to give reasons but as you changed my post then ....
New trade deals - rubbish. Laws imposed by EU - not true
What is left I wonder and yes what a surprise, the argument comes back to immigration which is the only thing that this is all about.

Anyone would think immigrants into the UK was new thing - if you read earlier posts you would see that this is not the case either.
50 or 60 years ago (before the UK joined the EEC) then it was about Indians, Pakistanis, Jamaicans and the like - Commonwealth - now it's about Romanians, Poles, Bulgarians and refugees, same old, same old.
 
I can't believe this gets through a common sense test.
There is a substantial proportion of the electorate who either have no common sense, or are just too plain thick to be allowed vote. It's why democracy is a shit idea. There should be a test to join the electoral roll.

Voting to remain, btw.
 
People have tried to give reasons but as you changed my post then ....
Jut pointing out that even as someone who shares your view the UK should remain I find posts like that not conducive to decent debate. I think on the whole the 'leavers' in this thread are getting treated a bit shabbily. Reminds me a bit of the Scottish independence campaign where people would explain why they wanted to vote for independence only to be told 'nah, it's just cause you watched Braveheart too many times and you hate the English - bloody nationalists' except this time it's just 'nah, it's just cause you're scared of immigrants'. It's silly to suggest that is the only reason people want to leave the EU. I've seen plenty of reasonable people making arguments for leaving the EU despite the fact they want more immigration.
 
Jut pointing out that even as someone who shares your view the UK should remain I find posts like that not conducive to decent debate. I think on the whole the 'leavers' in this thread are getting treated a bit shabbily. Reminds me a bit of the Scottish independence campaign where people would explain why they wanted to vote for independence only to be told 'nah, it's just cause you watched Braveheart too many times and you hate the English - bloody nationalists' except this time it's just 'nah, it's just cause you're scared of immigrants'. It's silly to suggest that is the only reason people want to leave the EU. I've seen plenty of reasonable people making arguments for leaving the EU despite the fact they want more immigration.

But I've had numerous discussions and debates on here about the other issues, none of which stand up. I don't think leavers are getting treated badly. If everyone told the truth on both sides then the average voter would have a clearer idea what to decide. I know Remain come out with some rubbish but Leave are just unbelievable - just a load of waffling tripe.
As I've stated on numerous occasions on here, I am British, I live in France, I am not going to vote, I will never return to the UK to live. The only effect it will have on myself personally is that I will take french citizenship if the UK leaves, just a bureaucratic process, not a major life changing effect.
 
As I've stated on numerous occasions on here, I am British, I live in France, I am not going to vote, I will never return to the UK to live. The only effect it will have on myself personally is that I will take french citizenship if the UK leaves, just a bureaucratic process, not a major life changing effect.
I think it makes you a rather interesting case. You're not greatly (compared to others) impacted personally, in any major way, by the actual technicalities of it all, but I would argue you could be impacted emotionally, rather more than most Brits. I would guess you consider yourself both British and French and as such are quite fond of the fact the two countries are to an extent 'in it together'. I think you've mentioned your children, before, and I would imagine that you'd wish them to feel some connection to Britain and that would be harder should the UK reject a union with their country. I would imagine all the people living for today, you may say I'm a dreamer... Sorry lost my train of thought.

I suppose what I'm saying (whilst making various wild assumptions) is... I think you're in a position to contribute so much more to this debate than you do when you're being very dismissive of others.

EDIT - I'm done with 'having a go' at you now. Just one of those things I've thought briefly every now and then but never bothered to comment on and so when I finally do I look like an angry stalker...
 
I suppose what I'm saying (whilst making various wild assumptions) is... I think you're in a position to contribute so much more to this debate than you do when you're being very dismissive of others.

I tried that, now I'm just despairing that the UK will make an enormous mistake imo for all the wrong reasons, this makes me sad.
 
Some cracking thoughts there gentlemen. Plenty of stuff to keep Farage going as well. (and Nick).

I'll be taking some time away from politics actually. I'd spend it with my family but they'd likely find it too annoying. :smirk

And whilst we have far too many appointees in the House of Lords at present, an entirely elected second chamber is not something which fills me with joy.


Meanwhile, in the real world...

We pay tens of billions of pounds to a project in which we don't believe, and one whose interests conflict with our own. Moreover, our ability to influence the agenda to something more favourable is only likely to worsen in the years ahead. Cameron and Osborne have been eager to make predictions about Brexit, but what of the European Union in 2030?

Remain has offered no workable reform agenda or positive vision for the EU, only more of the same. If such is the electorate's wish i must come to accept that reality (albeit with deep regret), for i can't suppose that we'll have another referendum this side of 2050.


This is even wishier and washier than I anticipated. You're addressing the one topic that could win the vote for Leave and offering absolutely nothing.

More apprenticeships and training might or might not be a good idea but we don't need to leave the EU to bring that in. Sorry to say it comes across as an argument born of desperation.

Apparently you're happy to accept the Norway model of agreement, free movement and all, which is honest but takes the whole topic of immigration right out of the Leave argument. Good luck with what remains.

I can no more endorse an unsustainable sudden decline in immigration than i can the folly of unmanaged immigration which we have at present. The object will be to reduce immigration, i think i made that fairly clear, but successive governments have spent two decades creating this situation and it can't be reversed over night. There will always be a need for migrant labour and we shouldn't be afraid of that, however the disregard shown to certain sectors of the economy (construction for example) has been wilfully negligent.

The point about apprenticeships and training was to highlight the need for a coherent strategy, as a successful fall in immigration will require work on the country's part. Yet this will matter little if big businesses can still take the cheaper option and hire in eastern Europeans at will. We need to be able to instil a feeling of necessity but in a way that affords adaptability. And provided that the Government enforces its intended increases to the minimum wage, some jobs in the service sector will be more appealing to Britons already here.

But as i have stated previously, i do believe that a form of freedom of movement could still exist in a Brexit scenario.We might ask for the option of controls if the weight of numbers is thought to be too high, however i don't see that as unattainable.


Thanks very much for that, I appreciate hearing from someone sensible regarding brexit. Most the people I've heard from on Facebook etc have just been right wing idiots who just don't like immigrants.

So in terms of direct impact on the average man you're saying an improvement in public services. As another poster mentioned above, this worries me with a tory government as they are clearly hellbent on privatising everything to benefit the wealthy. I fear if we brexit and retain the conservatives any chance of a more equal society will be scuppered for decades.

A lot of the other things you mention again sound ideological and will have little direct impact on your average joe.

Governments are cyclical though: it was only six years ago that Labour left office and that followed three terms in power. What is done with the money saved and the sovereignty returned, will change as the government does. Although Mozza let his anti-Tory sentiment influence his thinking a little too much IMO; more likely, is that the Government would look at regeneration projects (in addition to public services that is). Something...noticeable.

There is also growing dissatisfaction with the party leadership, both on the part of backbenchers and long standing voters. I suspect that they are building up resentment comparable to Labour in Scotland, risking a very similar outcome over time.

Out of interest, which points did you believe were ideological concerns rather than practical ones?
 
Last edited:
There used to be thread in the CE forum that was once discussing the the UK economy, the economy was doing worse than expected and the majority of posters blamed the EU economy for UK's crap performance.

Wonder if any remain posters in this thread posted in that one, Jaz and Brian are the only 2 I can remember of the top of me head. I will look for
it
 
Arguing with someone on Facebook about this for the last hour, and when I asked what proof or evidence they were using to back up the claims they believe on the anti EU website they were sending me screenshots from they said 'it's got .org at the end of it'.
 
Last edited:
I'll be taking some time away from politics actually. I'd spend it with my family but they'd likely find it too annoying. :smirk

And whilst we have far too many appointees in the House of Lords at present, an entirely elected second chamber is not something which fills me with joy.




We pay tens of billions of pounds to a project in which we don't believe, and one whose interests conflict with our own. Moreover, our ability to influence the agenda to something more favourable is only likely to worsen in the years ahead. Cameron and Osborne have been eager to make predictions about Brexit, but what of the European Union in 2030?

Remain has offered no workable reform agenda or positive vision for the EU, only more of the same. If such is the electorate's wish i must come to accept that reality (albeit with deep regret), for i can't suppose that we'll have another referendum this side of 2050.




I can no more endorse an unsustainable sudden decline in immigration than i can the folly of unmanaged immigration which we have at present. The object will be to reduce immigration, i think i made that fairly clear, but successive governments have spent two decades creating this situation and it can't be revered over night. Thee will always be a need for some migrant labour and we shouldn't be afraid of that, however the disregard shown to certain sectors of the economy (construction for example) has been wilfully negligent.

The point about apprenticeships and training was to highlight the need for a coherent strategy, as a successful fall in immigration will require work on the country's part. Yet this will matter little if big businesses can still take the cheaper option and hire in eastern Europeans at will. We need to be able to instil a feeling of necessity but in a way that affords adaptability. And provided that the Government enforces its intended increases to the minimum wage, some jobs in the service sector will be more appealing to Britons already here.




Governments are cyclical though: it was only six years ago that Labour left office and that followed three terms in power. What is done with the money saved and the sovereignty returned, will change as the government does. Although Mozza let his anti-Tory sentiment influence his thinking a little too much IMO; more likely, is that the Government would look at regeneration projects (in addition to public services that is). Something...noticeable.

There is also growing dissatisfaction with the party leadership, both on the part of backbenchers and long standing voters. I suspect that they are building up resentment comparable to Labour in Scotland, risking a very similar outcome over time.

Out of interest, which points did you believe were ideological concerns rather than practical ones?

I think ideological is probably the wrong word. What I mean is if you said to me if we leave the EU my family would be 5k a year better off I'd consider that a direct impact. But if you said something like leaving the EU takes the power away from Brussells and into our hands, what does that really mean to me? Some public schoolboy is still making decisions on my behalf that I don't agree with, he's just doing it closer to home.
 
I think it makes you a rather interesting case. You're not greatly (compared to others) impacted personally, in any major way, by the actual technicalities of it all, but I would argue you could be impacted emotionally, rather more than most Brits. I would guess you consider yourself both British and French and as such are quite fond of the fact the two countries are to an extent 'in it together'. I think you've mentioned your children, before, and I would imagine that you'd wish them to feel some connection to Britain and that would be harder should the UK reject a union with their country. I would imagine all the people living for today, you may say I'm a dreamer... Sorry lost my train of thought.

I suppose what I'm saying (whilst making various wild assumptions) is... I think you're in a position to contribute so much more to this debate than you do when you're being very dismissive of others.

EDIT - I'm done with 'having a go' at you now. Just one of those things I've thought briefly every now and then but never bothered to comment on and so when I finally do I look like an angry stalker...

I'm in a similar situation. In my case it wouldn't effect me emotionally at all. I dont care much for chauvinism. I just think it would be a utterly stupid decision for the UK to leave and it will only harm the country and the EU.
What pisses me off is the lies off the leave campaign and the negativity of the remain campaign.
 
Four weeks to the vote and still awaiting a genuine reason why Remain want to Remain (that hasn't been scare mongering)

Plague, Tsunamis, North Korea, WW3, Certain Death

The problem is that Cameron doesn't want to leave the EU, but on the other hand doesn't want to be seen as pro EU. It's all about politics.
 
Four weeks to the vote and still awaiting a genuine reason why Remain want to Remain (that hasn't been scare mongering)

Plague, Tsunamis, North Korea, WW3, Certain Death

Forgot to get back to you on this one. None of the things you listed - but bad financial impact on the country as stated previously - unemployment, higher taxes , devaluation of the pound, higher costs of goods and food all, property values declining - and another threat would be increasing interest rates to re-stimulate the economy. This is not scaremongering but a logical conclusion to leaving a free trade area.
 
Exit campaign is run by idiots who have allowed themselves to be depositioned as xenophobs when that is not the case.

Exit merely says our country Can decide how many new immigrants from Europe can come in and what qualifications or characteristics they should possess.

Likewise, Brits can still travel, study and trade with European counties, we need to fill in forms and get visa stamps on arrival. Its what used to happen only 15 years ago and hardly changes a thing.

Because the exit manifesto is so badly communicated, none of these most basic factors are clear. And it will cost them the vote.

Personally I see nothing morally wrong about exiting. Im not sure about the economic arguments because there are so many and they are all conflicting.

Right now I have no idea which way I'll vote and suspect that's true for the majority.
 
Exit merely says our country Can decide how many new immigrants from Europe can come in and what qualifications or characteristics they should possess.

Likewise, Brits can still travel, study and trade with European counties, we need to fill in forms and get visa stamps on arrival. Its what used to happen only 15 years ago and hardly changes a thing.

Whatever rules we impose on EU citizens to enter and work in this country will be matched by the EU when it comes to our people going the other way. You can't choose who comes in whilst they have to accept all our people
 
Exit campaign is run by idiots who have allowed themselves to be depositioned as xenophobs when that is not the case.

Exit merely says our country Can decide how many new immigrants from Europe can come in and what qualifications or characteristics they should possess.

Likewise, Brits can still travel, study and trade with European counties, we need to fill in forms and get visa stamps on arrival. Its what used to happen only 15 years ago and hardly changes a thing.

Because the exit manifesto is so badly communicated, none of these most basic factors are clear. And it will cost them the vote.

Personally I see nothing morally wrong about exiting. Im not sure about the economic arguments because there are so many and they are all conflicting.

Right now I have no idea which way I'll vote and suspect that's true for the majority.

The UK's economy depends for approx. 45 % on exports to the EU. If the UK leave the EU and start negotiating that necessary trade deal with the EU, then the truth is that the UK will be obliged to make concessions on immigration to the UK of EU citizens. This is something which is conveniently not mentioned by the leave campaign.
So in other words, you still end up with the same numbers of immigration. However, you won't have any influence on what happens in the EU anymore. This will happen if the UK leave, it's not even speculation.
Not that i believe immigration is a bad thing. As already been discussed in this thread, the facts are that (EU) immigrants bring far more in to the UK than they take out. Also, the fact is that the reason of why some of the UK's services are overstretched is because of the lack of funding by the governments, and not because of the numbers of immigration. Another example, the reason why there is a housing shortage in the UK is because of the lack of new affordable housing built for decades now, and not because of the number of immigrants. Etc, etc, etc. So in actual fact, the whole immigration argument shouldn't even be part of the consideration whether to vote to leave or not!!!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.