Even if one were to assume that we had a more streamlined version of what people describe as the 'Norway model', we are going to have more money to spend on projects at home. Not a small amount either, enough to make an recognisable impact on the shortfall afflicting public services at present. It could be used for nurses and doctors, new schools, or subsidised green initiatives with the object of reducing energy costs. The direction of investment would be driven by the government of the day, be it Conservative or a Lab-Lib coalition in 2020/2025.
A good example of the greed which exists at the EU would be the
EEAS, it epitomises both money wasted and ambition for power. As of last year the department's annual budget ran to 1bn, and this will only grow over time. Why are European nations (and by extension their taxpayers) paying for Brussels to have its own Foreign Office? Does such an arm of government serve your interests, or provide afford some questionable politician a title and status?
If, on the other hand, the UK attempts to forge its own unique arrangement with Europe, the potential benefits to trade are even acknowledged by the Remain camp. Indeed a Government memo leaked to the Telegraph at the weekend, argued that objections by other EU sates to a South American trade deal was costing the UK upwards of £2bn per year. Conversely, a win for Leave offers the best chance of stopping TTIP. Obama's legacy project carries the very real risk of harming the everyday lives of European citizens: from lower food and environmental standards, to payouts to corporations in the even that we decide upon policies which hurt their profit margin. Why should our leaders feel constrained by the whims of Monsanto?
Finally, i'll touch on the often exaggerated topic of immigration. Contrary to the respective brands of stupidity projected by Remainers and Ukippers alike, there shall be no raising of drawbridges or mass expulsions of eastern Europeans. Yet if combined with an effective system of apprenticeships and training programmes throughout the next decade, we can certainly bring the numbers down to something more sustainable. Not only will this go to alleviate the pressure on housing supply in the UK, but wages and skills in the will increase in kind. Regrettably, exploitation has been an inescapable consequence of Europe's existing system of freedom of movement. It is a cheap solution for big business and a lazy one for national governments. The host population are victims, as are the migrants themselves.
For me, Brexit is about building something better, for these islands of ours and all Europe. We can enhance democracy at home and create better public services, find a third way in the stagnant politics of a continent. There might well be an economic shock in the immediate term, however i would expect a sense of calm to be restored within months, if not weeks. I cannot tell you what to believe or presume upon what sort of country you hope for in the future, but i'd far rather we show the ingenuity of making the attempt than do nothing at all.