Nick 0208 Ldn
News 24
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2004
- Messages
- 23,721
Not really, most just don't want to join the Anti-EU agenda because its discourse is dominated by right wing scare mongering such as 'Immigrants are overrunning us' or 'We're just funding those unworthy eastern European countries'. Most of the left across Europe agrees that the EU has big problems such as undemocratic structures, massive lobbyists influence or shady trade agreements like TTIP. Doesn't mean they have to jump on the identity/sovereignity losing, control immigration etc. train.
I'm not british so I can't vote anyway but I know I wouldn't support a campaign that is lead by bellends like Farage, Galloway or Boris Johnson. And let's face it: Leaving the EU won't make Britain more liberal, progressive or socially fair - like others said, it'll just give the Tories free reign to do what they want.
This pretty much sums up my thoughts on the matter. There are elements that would see me vote leave but ultimately they're issues to fight against rather than a vision to strive towards.
I can only see Brexit benefiting the rights discourse where as a vote to remain should put these things to bed.
The EU has persecuted millions of its poorest citizens to preserve a the vested interests of a few, any vote to remain carries the taint of endorsing those decisions. That the supposedly idealistic members of the left would choose to further the ambitions of Brussels over their counterparts elsewhere in Europe, is plain hypocrisy.
Much of your characterisation of the Leave campaign's adherents is little more than the slanderous nonsense all too common among the EU's proponents. Rather insulting really, if one considers the organisation's lamentable handling of recent migrant crises, Let us recall some of its most 'progressive' acts shall we?
- Playing into the hands of traffickers and endangering the lives of thousands by encouraging them to take to the Mediterranean.
- Bribing the Turkish government to make up for the original balls-up.
- The ensuing degradation of Schengen, which is essentially dumping the problem upon Greece of all nations.
- The responsibility European countries have for the Libya we see before us today.
There is no competent leadership being displayed here, none. Indeed it would be apt to describe what passes for European cooperation as a disgrace. But hey-ho, let's press ahead with the farce.
Interesting take on the matter from Anatole Kaletsky. @Nick 0208 Ldn
...because Cameron has no wish to antagonize his party’s implacable Euroskeptics until it is absolutely necessary; but as the referendum approaches, this political imbalance will abruptly reverse.
Well that prediction didn't make it past yesterday afternoon.
As a result, the “Out” campaign has been left effectively leaderless and has already split into two rival factions—one driven mainly by anti-immigrant and protectionist sentiment, the other determined to concentrate on neoliberal economics and free trade. Even in the unlikely event that the charismatic Johnson manages to unite the squabbling political eccentrics and widely divergent ideologies backing Brexit, the London Mayor’s buffoonish image and his many contradictory comments in the past about Europe will only add to the air of chaos and frivolity surrounding the Brexit campaign.
People are far more accommodating of eccentric behaviour than they are lies and deception, the latter being qualities which Cameron is very well acquainted with. Hell, we've even got him holding up the EU for its role in tackling Ebola; Cuba was probably of more practical use.
In a survey published late last year, posted by @bishblaize IIRC, Boris was the most popular British political figure. Cameron and Osborne, however, are contemplating cuts to disability benefits in the near future (such unrelated issues could come into play).
Last edited: