- Joined
- Jan 3, 2009
- Messages
- 46,319
If we vote leave you're in for a very expensive trip.
I'm dreading it for the impact on the dollar.
So should I go get some Euros tonight just in case? Is that how it works?
If we vote leave you're in for a very expensive trip.
I'm dreading it for the impact on the dollar.
I dared to get into a facebook debate on it. Sure that seems a huge mistake, but I did pull a liner out that practically shut down the argument.
People were banging on about taking back our power and those gosh darn inmigrants as usual, and someone posted "well we can at least take back all our power"
So I simply replied "yeah, and give it to the Tories"
I swear I could actually hear a few brains popping reading that, and silence since
As are the markets and the bookies/punters.Think it's just general pessimism. Still confident of a Remain win myself.
It's a bit of a gamble really, if we vote remain the rate will probably improve further.So should I go get some Euros tonight just in case? Is that how it works?
The EU didn't impose austerity, your tory boys did.
A lot of non Tories voted for them not because of the referendum but because they trusted Dave more than Ed on the economy.I must admit I'm concerned that the shy Tories from the GE polls will reappear at the ballot box to finish what they started.
But enough about the Conservative Party, Nick.Whilst this project has its roots in commendable ideals, the organisation of today is more than happy to sacrifice its citizens' wellbeing and prosperity to serve political ends.
It's a bit of a gamble really, if we vote remain the rate will probably improve further.
If you buy now and we leave you'll have done better, if you buy now and we stay you'll lose out a bit.
They have the power to veto the result, why would they even need to rig it?It's going to be fixed anyway by this corrupt government
Remain will "win" so don't worry if that's what you want.
Never overestimate farrage and his croniesJust when you think they couldn't sink any lower
#UsePens.It's going to be fixed anyway by this corrupt government
Remain will "win" so don't worry if that's what you want.
Ah yes, the ghost of Boaty McBoatface rears its ugly head.It's going to be fixed anyway by this corrupt government
Remain will "win" so don't worry if that's what you want.
It's going to be fixed anyway by this corrupt government
Remain will "win" so don't worry if that's what you want.
They have the power to veto the result, why would they even need to rig it?
Loosen that tin foil hat.
There was a YouGov poll posted recently that showed (iirc) 46% of those who said they'd be voting leave thought it was likely the vote would be rigged.The amount of people I've seen say about this rigging thing. Has anyone voting leave actually done any homework on what it is they are actually voting for?
Tell that to the Greeks, or the millions of other people across Europe who were hostage to a one-size-fits-all ECB.
The EU is absolutely culpable for its handling of the debt crisis; even the IMF, which Remainers trust without hesitation, was critical of Brussels.
Whilst this project has its roots in commendable ideals, the organisation of today is more than happy to sacrifice its citizens' wellbeing and prosperity to serve political ends.
Did you watch that video from the Liverpool University Professor @Nick 0208 Ldn ?
Some of the replies
Thanks for reminding me about that. Yes, i did give it a look when someone first posted it on here. I would have had questions for him were i present, either to clarify things points on trade or his political interpretations.
IIRC he closing section was on trade with non-EU partners, and he suggested that we'd need to tear up all of our existing deals and start over. However i have read that we could invoke the presumption of continuity, which means that if both parties are satisfied the previous terms could be renewed without difficulty. I could be way off on this, only he never explored the possibility during his presentation.
He also cites 10 years as a likely time frame for negotiations with the EU, a figure which even surpasses the OECD's projections. Given our pre-existing links, the composition of the Commons, and Norway as a model to borrow from, i expect it to be far less. It is also worth pointing out that provisions of trade deals can be brought into effect prior to full ratification (this occurred with the EU-South Korea treaty so i understand), in some cases years earlier. So it may be that we reach a deal on the essentials within 24-months, and then work on the optional extras to follow.
There was a YouGov poll posted recently that showed (iirc) 46% of those who said they'd be voting leave thought it was likely the vote would be rigged.
Thanks for reminding me about that. Yes, i did give it a look when someone first posted it on here. I would have had questions for him were i present, either to clarify things points on trade or his political interpretations.
IIRC he closing section was on trade with non-EU partners, and he suggested that we'd need to tear up all of our existing deals and start over. However i have read that we could invoke the presumption of continuity, which means that if both parties are satisfied the previous terms could be renewed without difficulty. I could be way off on this, only he never explored the possibility during his presentation.
He also cites 10 years as a likely time frame for negotiations with the EU, a figure which even surpasses the OECD's projections. Given our pre-existing links, the composition of the Commons, and Norway as a model to borrow from, i expect it to be far less. It is also worth pointing out that provisions of trade deals can be brought into effect prior to full ratification (this occurred with the EU-South Korea treaty so i understand), in some cases years earlier. So it may be that we reach a deal on the essentials within 24-months, and then work on the optional extras to follow.
"Control"My quest for a genuine, honest answer to what we actually gain if we leave continues...
"Control"
Which goes straight to the Tories.
Lose-lose right there!
But... but...Which goes straight to the Tories.
Lose-lose right there!
Short term yes but that's not a great argument when looking at the long term and considering that quite a few people actually like having the Tories in power.
Short term yes but that's not a great argument when looking at the long term and considering that quite a few people actually like having the Tories in power.
Yep. But it's not my personal stance, it's just what I pointed out today to some lefties banging on about voting leave for control/power and all that. Nothing is straightforward in this, it would be nice just to see the more determined element (on both sides) think a little deeper is all.
Fair enough and agreed! I've been getting told off for taking time to make my mind up.
Thanks for reminding me about that. Yes, i did give it a look when someone first posted it on here. I would have had questions for him were i present, either to clarify things points on trade or his political interpretations.
IIRC he closing section was on trade with non-EU partners, and he suggested that we'd need to tear up all of our existing deals and start over. However i have read that we could invoke the presumption of continuity, which means that if both parties are satisfied the previous terms could be renewed without difficulty. I could be way off on this, only he never explored the possibility during his presentation.
He also cites 10 years as a likely time frame for negotiations with the EU, a figure which even surpasses the OECD's projections. Given our pre-existing links, the composition of the Commons, and Norway as a model to borrow from, i expect it to be far less. It is also worth pointing out that provisions of trade deals can be brought into effect prior to full ratification (this occurred with the EU-South Korea treaty so i understand), in some cases years earlier. So it may be that we reach a deal on the essentials within 24-months, and then work on the optional extras to follow.