Erik ten Hag | Currently unemployed

They don't, they have better observational skills than Guardiola, for example, because that's their actual job. As opposed to Guardiola's.

I'm sorry, but that's thick. The whole point of football managers is to identify the right players to help their teams win.

Yes, they have scouts; but the manager has to observe the player to make a final decision. Why do you think Arsenal changed Arteta from head coach to manager so quick?
 
I'm sorry, but that's thick. The whole point of football managers is to identify the right players to help their teams win.
No, the point of football managers is to coach the team. See, the football manager working with a long contract, in charge of the whole football operation, is something typical of british football. Outside put GB, it barely ever existed. You think Guardiola is in charge of transfers at City? Klopp? Klopp was in charge, briefly, during the period Liverpool fecked up their transfer windows. He promptly had them hire someone else to do that job in his place

You think Madrid, the italian clubs, Bayern, were successful by giving their managers control over transfers? No. That kind of figure essentially hasn't existed outside GB for decades. And the lack of british managers in the PL for 2 decades, meant english clubs had to adapt to the same model as the rest of Europe, which in turn means the younger generation of british managers likewise had to adapt to focus on coaching
Yes, they have scouts; but the manager has to observe the player to make a final decision. Why do you think Arsenal changed Arteta from head coach to manager so quick?
Because they decided to trust Arteta and give him that level of control. Liverpool did the same thing with Klopp for a season and it was Klopp himself who told them it was a mistake, that wasn't up for that kind of job. Guardiola has never had that level of control, not even at City, where they bend over backwards for him. The most successful club of the decade barely cares about what whoever the current manager is thinks
 
The main thing I can't understand is how you can say this:

"Only once in his career has Pep made a mistake – in his first year at Manchester City when he completely underestimated the power and speed of the Premier League"

And then go on to make the same mistake.
 
It’s been said to death I know but I will never get over the Antony signing. Ultimately he didn’t sign off on the deal but when he sees the fee reaching 90m you obviously speak up and look elsewhere it’s common sense, it’s even more worrying that he’s managed this player before and thought ‘90m well spent’…..I mean fecking hell.

Ajax fans were laughing at us when that bid went in they knew he was a 30-40m player at best
 
The main thing I can't understand is how you can say this:



And then go on to make the same mistake.
He made more and more baffling decisions the longer his tenure went on. It’s like we have some sort of mental impact on our managers, as they all seem to suffer from this. No matter how completely sane and astute they are when they walk through the door.
 
The main thing I can't understand is how you can say this:



And then go on to make the same mistake.
How does anyone make that mistake? The physicality of the Premier League is one of those things that's become so cliched that even normies here in the US who don't watch football seem to understand.
 
He made more and more baffling decisions the longer his tenure went on. It’s like we have some sort of mental impact on our managers, as they all seem to suffer from this. No matter how completely sane and astute they are when they walk through the door.
That’s exactly how it seems to be. I think it’s the pressure of having the job and the overall culture of the club.
 
I'm sorry, but that's thick. The whole point of football managers is to identify the right players to help their teams win.

Yes, they have scouts; but the manager has to observe the player to make a final decision. Why do you think Arsenal changed Arteta from head coach to manager so quick?
Arsenal followed the Quantitative Model that Liverpool under Edwards and Brighton have advanced. You have teams of Mathematicians, Statisticians, AI engineers and Rocket Scientists running advanced simulations for how certain profiles might fit into a system. Along with the statistical analysis, traditional scouts reports are run against these models to gather insight. This is why Liverpool's recruitement under Edwards was considered revolutionary.
Sports science has advanced massively and big clubs have teams of geniuses applying the most up to date research on maximizing efficiency in player acquisition, health and load management for players and even injury recovery rates.
Hopefully INEOS have started increasing investment in sports science and moves us into this decade.

The fact that a manager, with proven experience in coaching a team and only coaching, even has the ability to "Set the club back" is a damning indictment on the hierarchy of a footballing institution the size of United, and absolves the manager of a lot of the blame. The new structure should be bringing dividends in the not too distant future.
 
From recruitment point of view,has to be the Manager that has done the most damage post Sir Alex.
The bolded looking like flops

  • Antony£85m
  • Rasmus Hojlund£72m
  • Casemiro£70m
  • Mason Mount£60m
  • Lisandro Martinez£57m
  • Leny Yoro – £52m
  • Manuel Ugarte – £50.8m
  • Andre Onana£47.2m
  • Matthijs de Ligt – £43m
  • Joshua Zirkzee – £36m
  • Noussair Mazraoui – £17m
  • Tyrell Malacia – £14.6m
  • Altay Bayindir – £4.3m
Wait you can't be saying this now with the benefit of hindsight, which noone had at the time of the signings including ETH.

Everyone, shockingly, till the start of this very season was defending Hojlund, Onana, Malacia, Mount (who remembers the 'who's midfield is better thread Utd vs Chelsea vs Arsenal' thread last year) and Casemiro. Noone here wanted to hear anything against these signings at the time. So many people, including me, said Casemiro is a one season man who will then be a dud on his last legs and anyone saying this was shouted down. Most people realised how awful Onana is and how mediocre Mount was even at Chelsea and England but everyone defended them. So how is the fanbase also not to be equally blamed? Why pile this blame all on the manager?

Because, I am sorry if I'll get attacked, the fanbase is part of the problem. Both us and Liverpool for a decade were deluded and expected instant titles on the back of overpriced mediocre signings. And all we got was crushing failure and especially for us, total humiliations in league and Europe. Then when the fanbase accepted we are shitte and need firstly years to make top 4 consistently before title challenges is when we improved. But as soon as ETH signed up we had 'end of an era' announcements by ETH no less, I remember Utd being talked about as a challenger because 'ETH'. You look at the thread now 'what position will we be in at the end of the season', its baffling most people thought top 4. The entire last season the entire fanbase excused the dire performances as 'injuries'. Who remembers Benito's thread with fancy fonts and colours on it? When to any neutral it was blindingly obvious the position in the table flattered Utd.

Lastly Martinez. I disagree totally on him. He isn't shitte at all. He is the way he is due to inconsistent tactics, playing him out of position and absolutely dire people around him. Put him at Arsenal at LB and I guarantee you he'd be better with the winger helping him out, 2 competent DCs and a DM infront of him. This is what I mean, uptil the start of the season he was the butcher, one of the best and now he's sh*t?

I said it before too I watch Utd every week unless we are playing due to my best mate so this post isn't the back of me watching 10 min TikTok reels or being a rival fan but my honest truth.
 
From recruitment point of view,has to be the Manager that has done the most damage post Sir Alex.
The bolded looking like flops

  • Antony£85m
  • Rasmus Hojlund£72m
  • Casemiro£70m
  • Mason Mount£60m
  • Lisandro Martinez£57m
  • Leny Yoro – £52m
  • Manuel Ugarte – £50.8m
  • Andre Onana£47.2m
  • Matthijs de Ligt – £43m
  • Joshua Zirkzee – £36m
  • Noussair Mazraoui – £17m
  • Tyrell Malacia – £14.6m
  • Altay Bayindir – £4.3m

From a recruitment point of view LVG did the most damage, everything since then has been trying to recover from that damage.
 
Wait you can't be saying this now with the benefit of hindsight, which noone had at the time of the signings including ETH.

Everyone, shockingly, till the start of this very season was defending Hojlund, Onana, Malacia, Mount (who remembers the 'who's midfield is better thread Utd vs Chelsea vs Arsenal' thread last year) and Casemiro. Noone here wanted to hear anything against these signings at the time. So many people, including me, said Casemiro is a one season man who will then be a dud on his last legs and anyone saying this was shouted down. Most people realised how awful Onana is and how mediocre Mount was even at Chelsea and England but everyone defended them. So how is the fanbase also not to be equally blamed? Why pile this blame all on the manager?

Because, I am sorry if I'll get attacked, the fanbase is part of the problem. Both us and Liverpool for a decade were deluded and expected instant titles on the back of overpriced mediocre signings. And all we got was crushing failure and especially for us, total humiliations in league and Europe. Then when the fanbase accepted we are shitte and need firstly years to make top 4 consistently before title challenges is when we improved. But as soon as ETH signed up we had 'end of an era' announcements by ETH no less, I remember Utd being talked about as a challenger because 'ETH'. You look at the thread now 'what position will we be in at the end of the season', its baffling most people thought top 4. The entire last season the entire fanbase excused the dire performances as 'injuries'. Who remembers Benito's thread with fancy fonts and colours on it? When to any neutral it was blindingly obvious the position in the table flattered Utd.

Lastly Martinez. I disagree totally on him. He isn't shitte at all. He is the way he is due to inconsistent tactics, playing him out of position and absolutely dire people around him. Put him at Arsenal at LB and I guarantee you he'd be better with the winger helping him out, 2 competent DCs and a DM infront of him. This is what I mean, uptil the start of the season he was the butcher, one of the best and now he's sh*t?

I said it before too I watch Utd every week unless we are playing due to my best mate so this post isn't the back of me watching 10 min TikTok reels or being a rival fan but my honest truth.
Fans are emotional and mist of us vastly overate our football knowledge, if a coach listens to the opinions of fans before buying players, then we might as well appoint one of us to handle our transfers.

Look at the threads for Mount,Antony and Casemiro,even Onana, some fans raised their objections.

I agree with you that we as fans are partly responsible for our demise into mediocrity, that comes from assuming the 'moral high ground', of given players and coaches more time than they deserve.

Lastly, these aforementioned transfers are his responsibilities, his success rate is less than 15%.
 
It’s been said to death I know but I will never get over the Antony signing. Ultimately he didn’t sign off on the deal but when he sees the fee reaching 90m you obviously speak up and look elsewhere it’s common sense, it’s even more worrying that he’s managed this player before and thought ‘90m well spent’…..I mean fecking hell.

Ajax fans were laughing at us when that bid went in they knew he was a 30-40m player at best
You would definitely speak up - that is unless your very good friend and agent’s company just happened to be acting as advisors on the deal, and the higher the final transfer fee went the higher the agent’s final percentage climbed with it.
 
Eh? How do you work that one out?

It wasn't all just him, but that 2 year period was dreadful in terms of out going players and how they were replaced. Just look at the players who were sold, released and purchased during his reign.
 
Eh? How do you work that one out?
He made some mental calls. And I’m not just talking about reversing the Toni Kroos deal when he was about to do his medical! There was just way too much upheaval. We needed to keep that link to the title winning team in order to pass the mentality on to the new crop. But he bombed them all out in the space of about 12 months!

Rafael out, Darmian in. 10m net loss.
Evans out, Rojo in. 13m plus Nani net loss.
Welbeck out
Hernandez out
Van Persie out
All 3 gone for less than 25m. Just a past-it Rooney could play every week.

We also lost Giggs, Rio, Vidic, Evra, Fletcher, Welbeck, Kagawa and Anderson in his first transfer window! That’s a lot of the dressing room to lose. I’m not saying all of those were his call, but he could have minimised the turnover. We basically had to start over from scratch with a side that had no winners in it, and we’ve been playing catch up ever since.
 
It wasn't all just him, but that 2 year period was dreadful in terms of out going players and how they were replaced. Just look at the players who were sold, released and purchased during his reign.

Yeah we were still clearing out dross signed back then in 2020-21. We wasted hundreds of millions to make the squad much weaker.
 
The manager needs majority of control because they're more knowledgeable about football. Do you think Viera, Henry, Fabregas etc go to Arsenal if Wenger wasn't on transfer committee?
Now we have data analysts to do that digitally. They can cover 100s of players across nations. Its to help managers to focus on hypercompetitive football side now. Ideally managers should be given presentation of such findings and their input to be valued and tune the recruitment net.
 
Wait you can't be saying this now with the benefit of hindsight, which noone had at the time of the signings including ETH.

Everyone, shockingly, till the start of this very season was defending Hojlund, Onana, Malacia, Mount (who remembers the 'who's midfield is better thread Utd vs Chelsea vs Arsenal' thread last year) and Casemiro. Noone here wanted to hear anything against these signings at the time. So many people, including me, said Casemiro is a one season man who will then be a dud on his last legs and anyone saying this was shouted down. Most people realised how awful Onana is and how mediocre Mount was even at Chelsea and England but everyone defended them. So how is the fanbase also not to be equally blamed? Why pile this blame all on the manager?

Because, I am sorry if I'll get attacked, the fanbase is part of the problem. Both us and Liverpool for a decade were deluded and expected instant titles on the back of overpriced mediocre signings. And all we got was crushing failure and especially for us, total humiliations in league and Europe. Then when the fanbase accepted we are shitte and need firstly years to make top 4 consistently before title challenges is when we improved. But as soon as ETH signed up we had 'end of an era' announcements by ETH no less, I remember Utd being talked about as a challenger because 'ETH'. You look at the thread now 'what position will we be in at the end of the season', its baffling most people thought top 4. The entire last season the entire fanbase excused the dire performances as 'injuries'. Who remembers Benito's thread with fancy fonts and colours on it? When to any neutral it was blindingly obvious the position in the table flattered Utd.

Lastly Martinez. I disagree totally on him. He isn't shitte at all. He is the way he is due to inconsistent tactics, playing him out of position and absolutely dire people around him. Put him at Arsenal at LB and I guarantee you he'd be better with the winger helping him out, 2 competent DCs and a DM infront of him. This is what I mean, uptil the start of the season he was the butcher, one of the best and now he's sh*t?

I said it before too I watch Utd every week unless we are playing due to my best mate so this post isn't the back of me watching 10 min TikTok reels or being a rival fan but my honest truth.

I’m confused. The fan base does not have any meaningful input on club transfer policy. Our manager has had meaningful input on our transfer policy. That’s why they are not blamed equally.
 
From recruitment point of view,has to be the Manager that has done the most damage post Sir Alex.
The bolded looking like flops

  • Antony£85m
  • Rasmus Hojlund£72m
  • Casemiro£70m
  • Mason Mount£60m
  • Lisandro Martinez£57m
  • Leny Yoro – £52m
  • Manuel Ugarte – £50.8m
  • Andre Onana£47.2m
  • Matthijs de Ligt – £43m
  • Joshua Zirkzee – £36m
  • Noussair Mazraoui – £17m
  • Tyrell Malacia – £14.6m
  • Altay Bayindir – £4.3m
This list gave me chest and shoulder pains.

No wonder we're in this hole.
 
It’s been said to death I know but I will never get over the Antony signing. Ultimately he didn’t sign off on the deal but when he sees the fee reaching 90m you obviously speak up and look elsewhere it’s common sense, it’s even more worrying that he’s managed this player before and thought ‘90m well spent’…..I mean fecking hell.

Ajax fans were laughing at us when that bid went in they knew he was a 30-40m player at best
You underestimate Ajaxfans.

All their players are Gods gift to football and worth 100 million.