amolbhatia50k
Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
We will go for Pcohettino. That's where all the noise seems to be.
Sounds like the perfect coach for us. Which means we will hire someone else.Ten Hag is so massively impressive. This team is just so perfectly in sync, so well aligned and prepared.. Ofcourse Ajax has a lot of quality for Dutch standards at the moment, but they way they are dominating is so impressive.. Only he would see a feasible option in Steven Berghuis at #8 and its beautifull...
That’s not what I said though… I said they should start speaking to potential targets now and then announce it straight after the season instead of dragging it out.It's likely to be a manager that's in a job already, so why should we announce it months in advance and unsettle the other team. It's fine having discussions in the background, identify targets etc and keeping it confidential, but it's a shit move to unsettle the other team, especially if it's Ajax who have always been gracious and to VDS who has a connection with the club.
All great Managers love a challenge. Sir Alex left his superb Aberdeen side to manage a United side in far worse condition than our current one. Whoever gets the job will have a big budget and a big squad to work with.I'm not sure he knows what he is getting himself into if he decides to become our manager. He doesn't deserve to join us in this crisis.
My bad, sorry. I thought you said we should announce it.That’s not what I said though… I said they should start speaking to potential targets now and then announce it straight after the season instead of dragging it out.
It's absolutely what we should do. But it always feels like we act in a very ad hoc manner.That’s not what I said though… I said they should start speaking to potential targets now and then announce it straight after the season instead of dragging it out.
555 | 163 | +392 |
We will go for Pcohettino. That's where all the noise seems to be.
The noise you're referring to is some of our players allegedly claiming he'd be their preference.We will go for Pcohettino. That's where all the noise seems to be.
I think whoever comes in will have a free ride for the first season, knowing that there'll be an expected adjustment period. Of course if he ends up finishing the season appallingly in the bottom half playing terrible football then they'd likely be prematurely let go, but otherwise I don't think there'd be huge amounts of pressure from their first campaign assuming we're competitive around the top 4.I'm trying to understand our fans' reactions if Ten Hag was appointed and we started off pretty badly at the beginning of next season. Would we support sticking with him or want him replaced in that case? How much patience are we willing to afford him?
Whoever we appoint should be given time. By nature of appointing someone as manager, we are categorically stating that we believe this person can improve our fortunes and lead us to compete for trophies. You don't change your mind based on teething problems a few weeks or months into his tenure. This individual will be given time to implement his ideas and will be judged accordingly after a sufficient amount of time.I'm trying to understand our fans' reactions if Ten Hag was appointed and we started off pretty badly at the beginning of next season. Would we support sticking with him or want him replaced in that case? How much patience are we willing to afford him?
Whoever it is needs time. But IMO the right choice is Ten Hag so of course he'll get loads of time to get it right. If we are visibly getting worse the longer he is here, then of course, you change. As with any manager though, if they are getting their ideas through to the players, if we are slowly improving and playing as a team, if lack of individual quality is letting us down more than the system... Then you give them transfer windows to try and improve the situation further. You keep going on that path until it's clear that what the manager is doing isn't working and it's no longer a case of signings. That's why Ole was given 3 years. We steadily improved for a while, and then he had a big window and the results and performances collapsed completely, based on what he was doing.I'm trying to understand our fans' reactions if Ten Hag was appointed and we started off pretty badly at the beginning of next season. Would we support sticking with him or want him replaced in that case? How much patience are we willing to afford him?
I think whoever we appoint, he will need time. I think ETH will get the most leeway. Poch will get slightly less just by seeing social media interactionsI'm trying to understand our fans' reactions if Ten Hag was appointed and we started off pretty badly at the beginning of next season. Would we support sticking with him or want him replaced in that case? How much patience are we willing to afford him?
That is so bloody sexist!!please ask in the correct way
DADDY WANT WANT WANT
As much as he wants. Wants the alternative, to listen to these players?I'm trying to understand our fans' reactions if Ten Hag was appointed and we started off pretty badly at the beginning of next season. Would we support sticking with him or want him replaced in that case? How much patience are we willing to afford him?
I'm trying to understand our fans' reactions if Ten Hag was appointed and we started off pretty badly at the beginning of next season. Would we support sticking with him or want him replaced in that case? How much patience are we willing to afford him?
Match day thread:I'm trying to understand our fans' reactions if Ten Hag was appointed and we started off pretty badly at the beginning of next season. Would we support sticking with him or want him replaced in that case? How much patience are we willing to afford him?
Can people stop mentioning VDS - he's their CEO. We already have Richard Arnold and that isn't changing.Arnold, Fletcher, Rangrick, Van Der Sar and Ten Hag is the way to go. We need a team, not a manager and the board having two seperate ideas.
Arnold, Rangnick, Murtough and possibly Fletch all seem to favour Hag, so surely this is a foregone conclusion that he's the main candidate ?
Please tell me you have some evidence of this outside of the usual media crap...not sure I could take the disappointment if we end up with Poch.Arnold, Rangnick, Murtough and possibly Fletch all seem to favour Hag, so surely this is a foregone conclusion that he's the main candidate ?
I'm basing my opinion on the reports, yes but they do come from more reliable individuals.Please tell me you have some evidence of this outside of the usual media crap...not sure I could take the disappointment if we end up with Poch.
I'm trying to understand our fans' reactions if Ten Hag was appointed and we started off pretty badly at the beginning of next season. Would we support sticking with him or want him replaced in that case? How much patience are we willing to afford him?
I absolutely agree. As long as he is showing promise and we see what he is trying to work out with the team, he should be given as much time as he needs. Let's not forget that neither Klopp or Guardiola started with a thunder, but you could see what they were trying to do over the course of a season.Remember when Pep took over City ? Playing out from back was horrible and I really thought he was going to fail miserably. We will make some comedy of errors in the beginning and there will be arm chair experts calling his head out.
We also have the world cup coming means, the transition isn't going to be smooth. But by December/Jan we will see some sort of identity.
Long story short- he also needs time and we have to be patient.
As I've already said in this thread before, it seems like Joel Glazer favors Poch. When it comes down to the wire his opinion is the one that matters. Which means it will be Poch.
People want Ten Hag on pure vibes that he could be a managerial genius so we can't risk that he goes elsewhere. In reality, Poch's CV is way better.
People want Ten Hag on pure vibes that he could be a managerial genius so we can't risk that he goes elsewhere. In reality, Poch's CV is way better.
Tbf, both Mourinho's and LvG's CVs were better than Klopp's when they were appointed. See how that one turned out.It’s not all about CVs though, is it? Otherwise we’d be sitting here with another few CL and PL titles provided by the CV bullies Mourinho and Van Gaal.
These are exactly the pure vibes I'm talking about. How does this compare to successful reigns at PL clubs? It doesn't. It's these statistics that make people think he's some kind of miracle working genius who would revolutionize OT within weeks. Scoring 102 goals in all competitions whilst managing Ajax should be way, way less relevant criteria for the United job than getting 86 points with Spurs.Wanting the manager whose coached a side that have conceded 10 goals all season, won all 6 of their Champions League group games (with only the current champions scoring more goals in those 6 matches), and having already scored 102 goals in all competitions this season is “pure vibes”. Right.
Positive vibes onlyWanting the manager whose coached a side that have conceded 10 goals all season, won all 6 of their Champions League group games (with only the current champions scoring more goals in those 6 matches), and having already scored 102 goals in all competitions this season is “pure vibes”. Right.
In Holland where does the media think he will go?