There'sa big difference between saying Neville overreached in the Valencia job and then saying he hasn't followed football development for the last 20 years.
The latter is clearly not true. It's not true of Scholes or Ferdinand either.
They just view football differently to online fans. They believe the core principles are key to winning teams. The same principles that have been around forever. Effort, teamwork, attitude and talent.
Online fans seem to genuinely believe they're in the know purely because of the words "high press." This is their subject. The one they can talk about over and over. It's become the beginning and end for the online professors of football.
You seem to assume you know a whole lot about me based on reading a post and a lot of generalisations about Online Fans. I think probably I have a clearer picture of Gary Neville’s way of thinking than you have about mine, and that’s not because he is above 40, but because I’ve heard him speak his mind quite a lot.
You overlooked two words when you quoted me: ‘in detail’. Crucial to the meaning. Assuming Neville hasn’t followed the development of coaching football tactics, would be assuming he is deaf and blind. Assuming he hasn’t done so ‘in detail’, is just assuming he can do his tasks with a broad overview, and that he has his focus elsewhere than spending a lot of time going into details of the effects of different ways of applying different tactics.
That really just means that even as I concede he knows a hundred times more about football tactics than me, he does have holes in his knowledge, and sometimes even holes that someone like me, with a C level training certificate and an unhealthy interest in following certain football teams can spot.
Now, a lot of people dismissed Solskjær as a tactical simpleton, and I wouldn’t do that. Because he has been working for fifteen years coaching tactics while intensely studying people in the forefront of tactical development, to add to his experiences as a player - and it’s possible to hear that when he speaks. When Gary Neville speaks about the implementation of Rangnik’s tactics, it’s possible to hear that he at times blatantly misunderstands what they are, yet he still talks as if he knows for certain. He, and many of the other pundits, sometimes have too little respect for what they don’t know. It’s understandable, because they are probably told to, to increase entertainment value. In addition, when they are fans of a club (or haters), it may make them even more adamant on things they don’t really know the details of, and can be at times spectacularily wrong.
Now, you wrote as if I thought I’m better positioned or as if I’ve somehow claimed I know Eric Ten Hag is great choice because I know all about ‘high press’, but I’ve never claimed that. It’s all your conjecture. I don’t know.
I’ve just heard enough from Neville, Scholes, Ferdinand and Keane (and Carragher, Souness, Wright-Philips and Merson) to think that their opinions about how coaches like Ten Hag and Pochettino would work at United today aren’t really interesting to me. They have to many holes in their knowledge about that and too little self awareness for that.