red.knight
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2023
- Messages
- 749
Fair enough but overall we were the better team and should have won but didn't.Dominant 45 mins . Palace had the better chances in the 2nd .
Fair enough but overall we were the better team and should have won but didn't.Dominant 45 mins . Palace had the better chances in the 2nd .
Although not exactly like Spurs, we have been in the wilderness for the past 11 years if you havent noticed yet
It will take time and investment to bring United back to where it belongs.
- We havent challenged for the Premier League or Champions League since Fergie retired.
- We have finished outside the top four on 6 occasions in 11 seasons.
- We have had 6 managers in 11 years.
- We have the largest net spend of any Premier League club since 2014.
- We have won only 5 trophies and Ten Hag won 2 of those.
- Theres a reason why Mourinho described finishing 2nd with United as one of his greatest achievements.
- Rangnick was not out of touch when he stated that United needs open heart surgery.
It was more than 45 minutes that we were dominant for. And the game as a whole massively favoured us on chances.Dominant 45 mins . Palace had the better chances in the 2nd .
Thats fair but overall we were the better team and should have easily won. Its a frustrating resultDominant in the 1st half.
Not over the course of the entire game.
But Ten Hag, Mourinho, and Van Gaal all won trophies under the previous regime? Some also managed to finish second in the league, something Arteta is lauded for on here.That nobody would have succeeded under the previous structure.
Thats fair but overall we were the better team and should have easily won. Its a frustrating result
AgreedFair enough but overall we were the better team and should have won but didn't.
They had more shots on target than us in the 2nd half if you want to paint the 2nd half as dominant where we were playing back and over the full half line for the last 10 mins that’s your prerogative.It was more than 45 minutes that we were dominant for. And the game as a whole massively favoured us on chances.
I'm not painting the second half as dominant. I'm saying we didn't only dominate for 45 minutes. They had better structure and some good chances created (2 very good ones) after around 60 minutes.They had more shots on target than us in the 2nd half if you want to paint the 2nd half as dominant where we were playing back and over the full half line for the last 10 mins that’s your prerogative.
7th.
Anyway whether we made it or not it was never off after 10 games because the competition for 4th is not as good or as consistent as you seem to believe.
You can definitely do yourself our of the titile race but we have never been out of a top 4 race after 10 games even last season
To add to that your ability to dominate games and create chances and limit opposition chances is more indicative of your final league position after 10 games than your points total
Newcastle are not a very tough opponent. Newcastle are actually shite, they have been playing as bad as Crystal Palace in a couple games. They lost that game anyway. They drew to relegation fodder and they played another relegation fodder at home.
They were also benefitting from an Arsenal side missing 2 vital players, and were toothless.
The stats dont even show that they are better than us, they've just played some easier sides whilst we've had Fulham and Brighton before Liverpool (both of which are better than Brentford and Everton).
Why are you considering games from last season to try and crowbar your point in? Have you watched Newcastle this season? They're diabolical this season and scraping games through wild goals.Newcastle played Spurs at home.
Newcastle are unbeaten in their last eight home league matches, winning six. We have only won two of our last away league matches, with three losses and three draws. You can call them shite all you like, but pretending like a match at St James Park isn’t a tough match for the likes of us or Spurs is nonsense.
You could more easily argue that we’re not a very tough opponent under Ten Hag.
One half creating a couple of chances without scoring is enough for people to say we 'dominated' the game now.
I remember what it looked like when we actually did dominate games.
Unfortunately a game lasts 90+ minutes.At 40th minute mark we had 10 shots with 4 on taget, hitting the bar twice with Palace having 0 shots overall.
Kinda dominant innit
I am not sure where you get your statistics but I dont believe ten Hag is statistically one of our worst performing managers in the PL era.Ten Hag is also statistically one of our worst modern performing PL managers. We had back to back Top 4s with Ole before turning to shit, we also had decent consistency with Jose. We just never got the consistency to be a top title challenging team.
I don't think the problem at hand takes years to fix. Just look at Aston Villa, they were relegation candidates under Gerrard and a new Manager with purpose and a clear identity immediately turned them round to a top 4 team. The same players, the same club structure.
I can see your perspective don't get me wrong. I just don't buy the argument that it takes 4/5 years. If by year 3 nothings changed and results are still as bad then clearly a new direction is required.
We still should have standards and those standards are at rock bottom right now. Surely by year three after 600 odd million spent the team should have a direction and standards no? 40% win rate in the last 20 PL games is rock bottom standards no?
I would say I will give him until December to assess his performance. I am not just looking at the results but also at the overall performance and progress. Yes, I expect a top 4 finish this season or 5th place and a Europa League win.I'm curious, would you wait till December before analysing Ten Hag or would you allow him the full season? What was your hope for this season? Top 4? Or do you think that's unachievable?
Why are you considering games from last season to try and crowbar your point in? Have you watched Newcastle this season? They're diabolical this season and scraping games through wild goals.
Brighton and Fulham are both better than them. They got well beaten by Fulham today in fact. We've played both of them plus Liverpool.
As I said, Spurs have not performed better than us and are ahead of us in no small part due to their easier fixtures - even if you want to park Newcastle, 3 of their 5 has been Leicester, Everton and Brentford for fecksake
Really bad.What's his away record now against anyone other than promoted/relegated sides?
After the Brighton game, I mentioned a troubling trend, and unfortunately, it continues. We dominate games, create quality chances, yet fail to convert them. At least this time, there weren’t any individual mistakes leading to goals against us, but the bigger issue persists: we’re dropping points because of our inability to finish.
Rk Squad MP W D L GF GA GD Pts xG
▼xGA 4 Liverpool 2 2 0 0 4 0 +4 6 5.1 0.8 1 Manchester City 2 2 0 0 6 1 +5 6 4.1 1.2 10 Manchester Utd 2 1 0 1 2 2 0 3 3.9 2.5 9 West Ham 2 1 0 1 3 2 +1 3 3.7 3.3 5 Tottenham 2 1 1 0 5 1 +4 4 3.6 2.0 7 Nott'ham Forest 2 1 1 0 2 1 +1 4 3.6 1.3 2 Brighton 2 2 0 0 5 1 +4 6 3.5 1.9 14 Bournemouth 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 3.5 2.9 12 Aston Villa 2 1 0 1 2 3 -1 3 3.2 3.2 8 Chelsea 2 1 0 1 6 4 +2 3 2.6 2.7 17 Crystal Palace 2 0 0 2 1 4 -3 0 2.5 2.9 19 Wolves 2 0 0 2 2 8 -6 0 2.4 2.9 11 Fulham 2 1 0 1 2 2 0 3 2.2 3.0 3 Arsenal 2 2 0 0 4 0 +4 6 2.1 1.7 6 Newcastle Utd 2 1 1 0 2 1 +1 4 1.9 4.0 13 Brentford 2 1 0 1 2 3 -1 3 1.9 3.7 16 Southampton 2 0 0 2 0 2 -2 0 1.9 2.5 15 Leicester City 2 0 1 1 2 3 -1 1 1.6 2.9 20 Everton 2 0 0 2 0 7 -7 0 1.4 3.8 18 Ipswich Town 2 0 0 2 1 6 -5 0 0.7 5.9
I know it's a very small sample size of 2 games, but it's clear to me that we have made imrpovements in creating chances. However, our main issue lies in our forwards' inability to convert these opportunities into goals. Rashford, Bruno, Amad, Garnacho, and Mount have all been guilty of missing several good chances so far. This team still seems to be suffering from a lack of confidence to me.
The high expected goals against (xGA) is partly due to the clear-cut chances we conceded, particularly against Brighton. For instance, if Maguire had cleared the initial cross—something he was well-positioned to do—we might have easily avoided their first goal.
While some may argue that Fulham could have recorded a higher xG against us due to Andreas' missed 2v1 situation, the same argument applies to us. Amad's messing up in a 3v2 situation against Brighton was a similar missed chance for us.
This pattern of missed chances has also been evident in pre-season games, like against Liverpool, and in the Community Shield match against City, where we created multiple good opportunities but struggled with finishing. While there is a call for a world-class striker, it's important that our current forwards should still be able to capitalize on their chances, as not every chance will fall to that striker. Teams like Liverpool and Arsenal benefit from contributions across their squad—Jota and Diaz for Liverpool, and Saka, Odegaard, and Trossard for Arsenal to name a few.
The result against Brighton was particularly hard to take because we performed reasonably well but lost due to lapses in concentration from our defense. In my view, ETH's job depends significantly getting these players to finish their chances. Both he and the new coaching staff have a huge task on their hands in that regard.
So putting those two together, the context is that we were the better team, dominated the first half, controlled portions of the second half, but still didn’t win with poor game management from our manager being a feature of that. Not sure I’d read that as being an argument in favour of Ten Hag.
I do find it strange that many of his biggest critics have argued that we have no style of play and that the style is more important than the results. Today showed a huge progression in that style of play and we actually looked like a top side. Yes the result is frustrating but this shifting of the goal posts is ridiculous.
Looks to me like we're getting better.I actually can't believe the naivity and blind faith of some. It's getting worse every year too.
Looks to me like we're getting better.
Everybody was expecting more. We should have fecking won.Solid point against 16th place & winless Crystal Palace.
Not sure how anyone could be expecting more.
Looks to me like we're getting better.
It means he set up the team very well to start with, but that the changes he made didn't work out. It certainly isn't worth the hysterical negative reaction on here.
Solid point against 16th place & winless Crystal Palace.
Not sure how anyone could be expecting more.
Pretty cheeky response but we definitely did look fantastic in that first half. Nevertheless, the fact that we didn’t score at least three or four and that we couldn’t capitalise on that dominance is absolutely unacceptable but completely expected.Because we looked the better team for 60 minutes against a struggling Crystal Palace and a squad that is worth double theirs? That's cute
What are you on about? I said there's no value in judging league tables after 5 games because of the randomised fixture list not being a good enough sample size of actual competence.Wait a minute. Weren’t you trying to argue that results in the first few games in the season don’t count for much? But now all of a sudden they’re the only thing that matters because it suits your narrative? True to form.
Objectively speaking, St James Park is a tough place to go for the likes of us and Spurs.
Nonetheless, all of this remains a pointless deflection from the point I originally made - that based on our results so far this season, an expectation that we will beat Spurs does not seem well founded. I’m still not sure if you even disagree with that point given how keen you always are to obfuscate and deflect and excuse.
Looks to me like we're getting better.