stevoc
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2011
- Messages
- 22,476
My god the Hysteria is palpable!
Won't someone, anyone do something?
Won't someone, anyone do something?
Dude, seriously calm down. If you read my post and got the notion that I tried to transport the message "trust the process" then something is wrong with your perception. If you want to be furious, go on. But lets not act as if you try to have a reasonable debate about the current status quo.
And once again - those "ridiculous tactics" are in place at Arsenal and City and many more teams. Difference is, they execute them way better. Which is something ETH should be heavily criticized for.
But thats not how it works mate. You can lose games due to bad luck, heck there was a fecking beach ball one year that influenced a match. I get your gist, of course we would be better off getting rid to bring in somebody who will bring better results but that part is where there simply are no guarantees. While the 17 million are set in stone once we pull the trigger.
And just to be clear - I am not saying that this is the only reason not to do it. But if you have no idea who you can bring in to take over, then acting simply for the sake of it becomes actionism and impulsive. The opposite of smart and foreseeing.
This is neither something I said, nor something I reacted to."I know this isn't good enough and it's the job of senior management to find an acceptable solution quickly to quell the bleeding."
Is a totally reasonable statement and should be totally achievable without ruining any long term plans. It is equally as acceptable whether you have a suggestion on who that should be or not.
I agree. We aren't. Applies to the fans who think "bring in anybody, can't get worse" and it applies to the fans who say "well if we don't a clue who to bring in, then lets keep it as it is for now".Truth is none of us have the faintest idea whether Ruud, Frank, Tuchel, Nagelsman or whoever would be a the right fit and get things going in the right direction. Loads of us wanted Mourinho and Van Gaal and Ten Hag. We aren't experts.
The last 10 (maybe even more) years have been unacceptable in terms of how we acted as a football club. At some point, the consequences of our bad decisions would mount and they would hurt. They do now when we finally brought in somebody who was supposed to update our football to a level, 80% of clubs out there are already on. Will ETH be able to achieve that? No I guess he won't and who knows, maybe he'll get burned on the way, personally not an issue with it. But the direction we've taken is the right one. Positional fluidity, organized pressing, patterns of play and building from the back - those things aren't inventions of ETH and we have to continue that path. Even if it hurts for a while longer. Obviously, there most likely is somebody out there who can achieve that better than ETH does and when he is avaiblable, go for it. But talk about bringing in Ole or Warnock or stuff like that tells me that some fans undervalue the issue we have at hand - middle- and longterm wise.The last 18 months have been unacceptable. It looks as though it may get worse or at best level out to last seasons unacceptable level. I'd rather not throw the season away and I don't buy the idea that our very experienced football board can't find someone who can get better performances and results than we are seeing.
I know the tenseness is contagious ^^Settle down mate, you're getting yourself worked up in here.
Maybe he meant “could” rather than “would”. Which is fair, we almost went out to CoventryWhy would we have gone out to Coventry?
There was the Romero handball on a shot by Garnacho: clear penalty.Hojlund goal ruled ball out of play despite no conclusive angle. Exactly the same happened later in the season and the procedure was “if there’s no evidence to rule a goal out you can’t just guess” funnily enough.
Rodri dive called back 2 mins later by Oliver.
Garnacho offside goal
Hojlund hauled down by Gabriel in same match.
Romero handball
Fulham “Maguire offside” (didn’t cost points in the end)
Luis Dunk handball.
Elliot dive against Liverpool - zero contact.
Two Chelsea penalties both obvious dives one with zero contact.
That’s just off the top of my head.
Something doesn’t add up.
If it’s how McCarthy seems to think it is, then the coaching team is deluded as to what a good training session is, or the players have a mental breakdown when it comes to match day.
Both scenarios boil back to the manager. He bought a load of those players so he knows how they train and if they are mentally strong.
If the coaching teams are exaggerating how well training is going then it’s his remit.
Indeed, I think a lot of people are baffled.Something doesn’t add up.
If it’s how McCarthy seems to think it is, then the coaching team is deluded as to what a good training session is, or the players have a mental breakdown when it comes to match day.
Both scenarios boil back to the manager. He bought a load of those players so he knows how they train and if they are mentally strong.
If the coaching teams are exaggerating how well training is going then it’s his remit.
Something doesn’t add up.
If it’s how McCarthy seems to think it is, then the coaching team is deluded as to what a good training session is, or the players have a mental breakdown when it comes to match day.
Both scenarios boil back to the manager. He bought a load of those players so he knows how they train and if they are mentally strong.
If the coaching teams are exaggerating how well training is going then it’s his remit.
No.Is it possible the club has taken stock, understood we’re a bit of a basket case, and lowered expectations accordingly in order the issue can be resolved ?
I’d say we are a bigger club now than when Denis Law stuck the dagger in.Read up on 1974.
Players having mental breakdowns or something not working yet makes sense for a few matches but not for 20 months at this stage.Something doesn’t add up.
If it’s how McCarthy seems to think it is, then the coaching team is deluded as to what a good training session is, or the players have a mental breakdown when it comes to match day.
Both scenarios boil back to the manager. He bought a load of those players so he knows how they train and if they are mentally strong.
If the coaching teams are exaggerating how well training is going then it’s his remit.
Precisely.It totally adds up, the coaching staff is incompetent. And it adds up even more if you consider the idea that they evaluate players that are coached by the same people and look good when together but out of nowhere look poor when they face players coached by someone else.
Indeed, I think a lot of people are baffled.
The reports of player buy in, good training sessions and board support for 10Hag have been there since the start of the season.
The manager is pissing off many posters on here with his calls for patience. He must be expecting things to start clicking soon.
I believe there is something wrong with our mentality: a lack of character and professionalism to bring the performances required at this level.
Nah he said if the ref did his job we’d have gone out. Implying there was some kind of error.Maybe he meant “could” rather than “would”. Which is fair, we almost went out to Coventry
That’s why I say it’s his remit if the coaching team are producing rubbish. ETH faultIt totally adds up, the coaching staff is incompetent. And it adds up even more if you consider the idea that they evaluate players that are coached by the same people and look good when together but out of nowhere look poor when they face players coached by someone else.
That’s why I say it’s his remit if the coaching team are producing rubbish. ETH fault
No they wouldn’t, his sacking would’ve been justified as he’d led us to our worst finish in PL history and also had us dumped out of a CL group that we should’ve got through comfortably. Instead they made a knee jerk decision off the back of us winning the FA Cup. Now, unsurprisingly the shit form has continued into this season and we’re currently sitting 14th with a negative goal difference. Absolute shambles.Ineos didn't make a mistake. If Eth was sacked at end of last season, people would keep saying man utd has no patience and is a club that likes to sack managers. No patience with LVG even after he won the fa cup.
Nah he said if the ref did his job we’d have gone out. Implying there was some kind of error.
I’m not blaming anyone but it’s important to point out its factually incorrect if they are basing an opinion on it.To be fair there was so much bitching and moaning in the media about that offside being unfair/incorrect. I wouldn't blame anyone for thinking it was an incorrect decision.
No they wouldn’t, his sacking would’ve been justified as he’d led us to our worst finish in PL history and also had us dumped out of a CL group that we should’ve got through comfortably. Instead they made a knee jerk decision off the back of us winning the FA Cup. Now, unsurprisingly the shit form has continued into this season and we’re currently sitting 14th with a negative goal difference. Absolute shambles.
Well the recent report from Ducker indicates ETH alone could cost around £14m to sack (The Athletic posited it could be even more). Then there are other staff costs, plus the cost of getting a new manager and all of the staff they want with them. The point you appear to have been making is that this doesn't matter, as the only people involved who would give a toss about all of those millions are accountants, which is ludicrous.
Feel free to re-read the exchange, as you appear to have missed some important caveats, even concerning the very first premise. I've highlighted it for you in your quote - I did not ask why he hadn't been sacked, I asked if you had another reason why some of the people making that decision would not be in agreement, as that was one possible explanation I provided in response to another poster. So you've kind of fallen at the first hurdle there in your eagerness to jump in on somebody. As I said, if there is even a miniscule glimmer of hope of him turning it around, some involved with the decision-making process (and no, they aren't all accountants) will see that as enough to baulk at the financial outlay involved sacking Ten Hag.
If you do not accept that millions upon millions of pounds in unexpected expenditure is a potential reason not to do something, then I'm very happy for you and all the wealth you must have accumulated, although I would be surprised if you manage to hold onto it for all that long. As for the club, clearly absorbing that kind of cost is a factor to consider, and it probably won't be until Ten Hag's underperformance reaches yet another low before those who are concerned with the club's financial position (who, once again, are not just accountants) give way upon the realisation that sacking him will definitely cost more than keeping him.
I’m not blaming anyone but it’s important to point out its factually incorrect if they are basing an opinion on it.
The key word is "could" - he'll only get everything due under his contract if he is sacked and then doesn't work for two years, but he won't get that all at once - the club would just continue to pay his salary under his existing contract. Far more likely, as the vast majority of managers do, is he takes a pay off (and even that may not get paid all at once) and takes a new job next season.
And that's not the point I'm making at all. Jim Ratcliffe, when pressed on it, made the point that he pays people to make decisions like whether Ten Hag should be sacked. I assume that the people referred to are the key Football Executives he's appointed. My opinion is that those people will not consider the cost to the club of that decision because that's not what they are paid to do - they are football people, not money people. If they decide he should go, for footballing reasons, I don't believe that someone else in the club on the financial side can essentially veto that decision on a purely financial basis. No top football executive would work in that system and they will have sought clarity on how things operate before taking the job.
If it's "millions" upfront it'll be much less than he's due under his contract. And those millions are not "unexpected" because the club considered sacking him in the summer (hence interviewing other candidates) and then chose to activate a clause in his contract which would increase the cost of sacking him. Clearly, that has all be considered. The idea that they would take the decision to activate a clause in his contract so as to make him unsackable because of the cost is madness.
The likely cost to the club of sticking with a manager they think will fail is likely to be far in excess of the cost of getting rid of him.
If the club can't afford to sack a manager with under 2 years left on his contract then there's much bigger issues.
Any other big club, Real / Bayern / Juve etc, remove Ten Hag for the CL failure alone. The fact we finished 8th after a disappointing year and he still wasn’t removed was bonkers !No they wouldn’t, his sacking would’ve been justified as he’d led us to our worst finish in PL history and also had us dumped out of a CL group that we should’ve got through comfortably. Instead they made a knee jerk decision off the back of us winning the FA Cup. Now, unsurprisingly the shit form has continued into this season and we’re currently sitting 14th with a negative goal difference. Absolute shambles.
What about our constant humiliations of 3-0 + against the big teams in the PL then? What about his absolutely disgusting record vs the top 6 teams?Tbf, he had to beat the likes of Liverpool, City and Newcastle to claim his trophies. Not exactly weak opponents.
The man clearly knows what it takes to go toe to toe with big teams which makes his tactics in smaller occassions baffling.
We know the club has many big issues - that's why the club is where it is, cutting costs wherever possible and shaking everything up behind the scenes. Leaning on the line "then there's much bigger issues" in several posts isn't giving anybody anything to think about - we already know there are.The key word is "could" - he'll only get everything due under his contract if he is sacked and then doesn't work for two years, but he won't get that all at once - the club would just continue to pay his salary under his existing contract. Far more likely, as the vast majority of managers do, is he takes a pay off (and even that may not get paid all at once) and takes a new job next season.
And that's not the point I'm making at all. Jim Ratcliffe, when pressed on it, made the point that he pays people to make decisions like whether Ten Hag should be sacked. I assume that the people referred to are the key Football Executives he's appointed. My opinion is that those people will not consider the cost to the club of that decision because that's not what they are paid to do - they are football people, not money people. If they decide he should go, for footballing reasons, I don't believe that someone else in the club on the financial side can essentially veto that decision on a purely financial basis. No top football executive would work in that system and they will have sought clarity on how things operate before taking the job.
If it's "millions" upfront it'll be much less than he's due under his contract. And those millions are not "unexpected" because the club considered sacking him in the summer (hence interviewing other candidates) and then chose to activate a clause in his contract which would increase the cost of sacking him. Clearly, that has all be considered. The idea that they would take the decision to activate a clause in his contract so as to make him unsackable because of the cost is madness.
The likely cost to the club of sticking with a manager they think will fail is likely to be far in excess of the cost of getting rid of him.
If the club can't afford to sack a manager with under 2 years left on his contract then there's much bigger issues.
You are correct and that’s why he has to go. Doing it in one off games is great but by now he should had developed some consistency and he can’t nail it down.What about our constant humiliations of 3-0 + against the big teams in the PL then? What about his absolutely disgusting record vs the top 6 teams?
Indeed. The entire argument about him being good against big teams in EPL is dubious if not nonsense.What about our constant humiliations of 3-0 + against the big teams in the PL then? What about his absolutely disgusting record vs the top 6 teams?
Yup, pretty much.Yeah, that's just the internet, it's an angry polarised cesspit where people need to run to the conclusion of any whims or feelings they have. I don't think that's going away anytime soon.
No, because the longer he’s been here and the more money he’s spent, the worse we’ve got.Is there enough in the bank from Ten Hag's time at the club to suggest we could be about to turn a corner?
Their disallowed goal in the last minute of the game, it really was a coin toss which way it went.Nah he said if the ref did his job we’d have gone out. Implying there was some kind of error.
It was offside by VAR wasn’t it? Pretty objective and not the ref failing to do their job.Their disallowed goal in the last minute of the game, it really was a coin toss which way it went.
You’ know this to be the case?
I think it's perfectly logical to expect better than what we have right now.
Might not have come across in my post but I used “(any manager)” to try to focus on the position, or the person.But he’s the one who’s been given the majority of say over a £600m spending haul and has somehow made us worse in the league
It’s on him
But he seems to have somehow manipulated people into thinking it’s not on him. It’s actually impressive. If he used that skill towards winning the league we’d win it every year