Agreed
Erik ten Hag | 2024/25 | Sacked
- Thread starter Cheimoon
- Start date
- Status
I think it’s deeper than that. A coach who was there for 2 years as part of this staff doesn’t know what is going on in match day. That’s a serious problem. If a head coach doesn’t know what the feck is going on with his own team he has long overstayed his welcome.
Against what now?
Agreed. I’m just commenting on it surface level. It’s just comical to present “we train really well but come match day we’re all shocked. There’s no better than EtH” as some sort of defence. Those statement(s) are verifiably false by most metrics.
I mean, brother you’ve been getting your back kicked-in by half of the teams in the league for like two years. You’re out of touch, make flawed assessments, opps have you figured out and you’re unable to find in-game and long-term solutions.
Against what now?
TypoWe didn't even dominate them for that long. It was only the first half that we dominated. Their manager then made tactical changes at halftime to take it to us (as opposed to playing scared like they did in the first half) and right from that period forward it was basically a 50/50 performance that then swung further and further in their favour as the game went on.
Does he forget for most of the league games?
What do you mean? In his first season we've beaten every single big team at OT. So clearly it's not an isolated statistic. He even beat Barca in Europa League that year.
The thing that gets us in trouble are his suicidal tactics that he abandoned after the 1st season in charge.
How do I know it's not just a fluke?
So while we are currently playing suicide ball, ETH has shown that when he wants to he can ditch that and get us a result as evidenced by matches against City and Pool in the FA cup.
Yeah we didn't cope with the opposition well last season whenever they tried to attack. Didn't seem to matter the level of the opposition.
So we can beat big teams sometimes, mostly at home whenever we don't use Ten Hags tactics.
What do you mean by Ten Hag tactics?So we can beat big teams sometimes, mostly at home whenever we don't use Ten Hags tactics.
Are we at a point where managers now trademark their tactics?
The players probably look good in training because they’re playing against each other.
I think saying it was a good achievement whilst also pointing out there were some elements of luck and some underperformances in that cup run is also a very balanced and reasonable view, is it not?
That doesn’t mean people “desperate to criticize” or “needlessly” critising - it’s just reality, and a part of the broader context of where we’re at under Ten Hag.
Just run in a straight line. It’s like playing fifa on beginner where nobody tackles you
I felt there was a needless playing down of the achievement, almost insinuating it was just down to luck that he won the trophy full stop. Hence my response.
None of the comments you were responding to came across as “desperate to criticize” to me. They mostly noted the good wins against good opposition, whilst also highlighting the fact that there were some fortunate moments and underwhelming performances against some lesser teams.
Would be comical for sure!
Even during the days when we dominated the league, rivals like Liverpool always gave us a tough time. So why is it now considered such an incredible achievement that we can step up our game against them? Are we expected to get battered every time? While I was thrilled that we won the tournament, I don’t see beating a rival as something extraordinary. Have our standards really fallen that far?
Wigan, Newport, Forest, Liverpool, Coventry and then City.
I’ll give you Liverpool and City.
City faced Huddersfield, Spurs, Luton, Newcastle, Chelsea and United. All bar one team were PL level.
United have not won the league for 11 years and counting, personally I don't care how many FA Cups, League Cups and Europa Leagues are won. United should be challenging for league titles and getting to the latter stages of the CL. Cups are nice but our managers should only be judged on the main two, regardless of what else is won in the mean time.
ETH can point to them two trophies all he wants, the league should be what he is judged on regardless.
So why doesn't he ditch it then whenever we're up against it? Is it because he can't or won't? Either option is a sackable offense
Are you saying Ashworth is an absolute dud as a sporting director? Thats not good.
I think he’s average. He’s probably good at building departments, making them work together, but I don't trust him to make good football decisions because he’s too close to bang average coaches like Southgate and Boothroyd. It might not matter much depending on Wilcox and Berrada’s influence
You don’t think this was an unnecessarily negative comment in response to me suggesting the cup win was impressive? That was literally the only comment I responded to as such, and is a sarcastic comment mocking the achievement.
I will only say it once more now, but I do not think Ten Hag should be our manager and should be sacked.
So you agree with me then
Sorry mate more power to you, but this is some serious rubbish, nobody else plays with such large gaps between the lines, nobody, because it is mental to do so.
We have not lost and drawn all the games we have due to bad luck, maybe the Rashford sending off in Europe last season, maybe the Zirkzee offside touch, but the vast, vast majority is down to piss poor coaching and tactics..... Honestly the cult of ETH has some weird Koresh Kool-Aid going on, 2 seasons and 7 games of rubbish and people are still kneeling down at his altar! and telling everyone else that they are blind because they cannot see the light, could just be a reflection off his head!
And literally letting Football Manager auto run our team would be better than Ten Hag, any manager within reason will be a massive upgrade, ETH is a train wreck and he is not going to improve, you know what I work in management and I have to sit through these management BS seminars every now and then, and "actionism and impulsive. The opposite of smart and foreseeing" is the kind of empty meaningless tripe that they peddle and try to make it sound like it has some gravitas and great wisdom.... what you have said is literally meaningless, it is just words designed to sound wise and therefore must be correct! just to be clear actionism (not that it is a word) can be smart and foreseeing, inactionism (also not a word) prevents necessary change and creates a negative reinforcement spiral, see I can make up management BS too.
£17m may be set in stone, like I said it is a fairly safe bet that another decent manager, even if not our dream manager will save us that in prize money, hell they only have to finish 8th again, which ETH is not going to manage and we are £22m better off that 14th which is where we should have finished last season and where we will finish this season if we stick with the bald one! at some point that becomes inevitable, the longer you leave it the worse the odds are that somebody else will be able to rescue anything from our season.
Honestly it mostly was down to luck. The most fluent performance of the entire cup run was the win in the final against City. The 3rd round win away to Wigan was comfortable but pretty much everything between then and the final involved us riding our luck in some capacity.
4th round: We were pegged back to 2-2 after going 0-2 up against Newport County. We salvaged the win but it wasn't a good performance and it was fortunate we weren't facing better opposition than a League Two side.
5th round: It required a last minute winner from Casemiro to scrape through against Forest in a game where we were unconvincing.
Quarter Final: Entertaining match but not one we ever really had control of. It was a topsy turvy match which required an 87th minute equaliser and coming from behind in extra time to win. Still a good win nonetheless.
Semi Final: Blew a 3 goal lead against Championship opposition and needed intervention from VAR to prevent us from losing the game outright. Ended up winning on penalties.
I think you can point to lots of individual moments, but at the end of the day, winning a cup and beating big teams on the way takes a bit more than luck. The majority of teams never win any trophies, including teams like Spurs who have lots of good players.
A side point, but I also think United’s fan base is a big part of why we win so many second rate trophies, even when we’re not a great team. Using the Spurs comparison again, they’ve arguably been a better team than United over the last decade, but United have won five (?) trophies in that time, and Spurs have won none. I sometimes wonder whether our huge support is an important factor in this, because our team and management hasn’t been very good in that time.
Last edited:
Ok I give up. We seem to be stuck with EtH until his contract runs out. This being the case, I hope he finds a suitable balance between his counter attacking game aka Oleball (saving his skin) and his suicidal pressing and leaving gaps in the middle of the field. One can only hope.
So you think being 14th is not below their objectives?
Well we're 14th and 5 pts off the relegation zone and he's still here. So the next "low" is being in the relegation zone. So maybe that's the breaking point.
Can’t believe he hasn’t got to feck yet.
I thought it was great cup run because we won the competition by beating two of our biggest rivals. It’s definitely something I would remember. It’s certainly a far better run than the Europa league, EFL Cup, and FA Cup that we previously won under Mourinho and LVG.
Just saw this on Reddit
Taken from the squeeky bug time thread on Reddit. First bit is about the presenter saying to the two guests.
“We’re all talking about whether he should lose his job or not”; that is a shocking line. It’s a witch hunt against EtH right now. These shambolic outlets, and penniless ex-professionals have nothing better to do than fire shots at United. We started the season playing some of the best football I have seen us play post-Fergie era, we have a blip at Palace (Hendo had a blinder btw, shouldn’t have let him go) and all of a sudden the media pile in on us. Since then, is it any surprise we have struggled?! When all anyone does is criticise us?! It’s got to destroy the players confidence when that happens, and EtH is left with the impossible task of picking those lads up whilst everyone kicks them, and him, whilst they are down.
Taken from the squeeky bug time thread on Reddit. First bit is about the presenter saying to the two guests.“We’re all talking about whether he should lose his job or not”; that is a shocking line. It’s a witch hunt against EtH right now. These shambolic outlets, and penniless ex-professionals have nothing better to do than fire shots at United. We started the season playing some of the best football I have seen us play post-Fergie era, we have a blip at Palace (Hendo had a blinder btw, shouldn’t have let him go) and all of a sudden the media pile in on us. Since then, is it any surprise we have struggled?! When all anyone does is criticise us?! It’s got to destroy the players confidence when that happens, and EtH is left with the impossible task of picking those lads up whilst everyone kicks them, and him, whilst they are down.
His philosophy on the ball is to play from the back and being aggressive in attack. Basically, as the ball is progressed, he wants everyone to go all out attack, which allows his team to be vulnerable from counter attack but in return the teams will get to create lot of chances. It reflects to the amount of times we conceded goals from losing possession in dangerous area but also having high xG. The number 1 issue about the risk we are taking in his philosophy is we have average and inexperienced attackers who tend to make poor decision making on the final third such as not being clinical and trying to shoot in difficult angle rather than pass/cross. That means there is no balance in this risk because we don’t have world class and clinical attackers who can overweight the high risk of being vulnerable in defense.
His philosophy off the ball is to be proactive by defending man to man. The PL requires great physicality to defend one v one or man to man. We lack the physicality to defend man to man. When I said physicality, I’m not just talking about strength but also stamina, fitness, and also pace.
Ten hag is very naive and too stubborn to adapt. Currently, the risks in his philosophy overweight the benefits due to both of the players he have and the physical demands in PL. He needs to adapt to succeed in here. Pep adapts, he used to play with overlapping full backs in Barcelona, but in PL, he played centre back with great physicality and good on the ball as full backs to adapt with PL’s physical environment and still maintain his philosophy of playing.
May be by playing different formation or structure and still maintain his philosophy by identifying the weakness and the risk of his philosophy and how changing the structure of the team will help ten hag to reduce the risk of his philosophy. I think the idea of playing 352/343 could help him because one, you’re adding centre back in this formation so that means you’re adding another player with more physicality than someone like Antony, Garnacho, Amad, or Rashford. Then, Having 3 centre back means you add extra body during the build up phase means if somehow the team loses possession in midfield, you have 3 players behind to cover.
His philosophy off the ball is to be proactive by defending man to man. The PL requires great physicality to defend one v one or man to man. We lack the physicality to defend man to man. When I said physicality, I’m not just talking about strength but also stamina, fitness, and also pace.
Ten hag is very naive and too stubborn to adapt. Currently, the risks in his philosophy overweight the benefits due to both of the players he have and the physical demands in PL. He needs to adapt to succeed in here. Pep adapts, he used to play with overlapping full backs in Barcelona, but in PL, he played centre back with great physicality and good on the ball as full backs to adapt with PL’s physical environment and still maintain his philosophy of playing.
May be by playing different formation or structure and still maintain his philosophy by identifying the weakness and the risk of his philosophy and how changing the structure of the team will help ten hag to reduce the risk of his philosophy. I think the idea of playing 352/343 could help him because one, you’re adding centre back in this formation so that means you’re adding another player with more physicality than someone like Antony, Garnacho, Amad, or Rashford. Then, Having 3 centre back means you add extra body during the build up phase means if somehow the team loses possession in midfield, you have 3 players behind to cover.
I genuinely thought he was going to be sacked this week. Now that that didn't happen... November international break is the next logical break point, and if not then the summer. Sadly I get the feeling the cost to sack him is playing too big of a role for the new owners.
No, I don’t. It simply pointed out that not all of the cup run was impressive. And that’s just a fact - some of the games were not impressive, and pointing that out doesn’t mean someone is desperate to criticize.
If that's what he needs to do and hasn't done it yet despite it clearly not working then he's not a very good manager. Time to go buddy
When we were coached by another stubborn dutch and former Ajax manager iirc…
England, Brighton and Newcastle seem to have done well since his time at the clubs so he is certainly doing something right. Hopefully the people we have can complement eachother and make it work.
- Status