Erik ten Hag | 2024/25 | Votes can now be changed

Erik ten Hag

  • Sack

  • Back

Results are only viewable after voting.
GreatDane said:
The team might not be a finished product, but I bet the next manager is going to look like a right genius when he gets them to perform a lot better that what Ten Hag is doing.
Click to expand...
Not saying he shouldn't be sacked, but man, so many people on here are going to be so disappointed when we sack Ten Hag and are still shit.
 
sparx99 said:
It’s interesting that last year seemed to be a tactical failure while this season seems to be individuals letting the team down. Both attacking and defensive stats are improved but ultimately we are relying on inconsistent players.

Now for what it’s worth if this was ETH’a first season I think you look at performances and the underlying stats and you say we’ve been a bit unlucky. Compare that to last year where even when we won we seemed to be the team getting away with things.

The problem is though that even if the model says we are underachieving our xG or whatever that’s likely to be ongoing. Our forwards are likely to consistently under-perform xG because there isn’t a reliable goalscorer amongst them. Any one of them could have a purple patch but you wouldn’t bet on it.

All we can do is hope that we keep creating lots of chances because we need to for this group to score goals. We also need to hope that we can add some more set piece goals because we need as many from all sources as we can get.
Click to expand...
This is his 3rd season now. Besides all the nice looking stats, where I'll agree have improved, his biggest problem is that he fails to find goals in the team.

3 seasons now and we still have trouble finding the back of the net. We got away with it in his first season, last season we didn't, and it seems we are just continuing the trend this season.

So his attacking setup doesn't work. I'm still not sure how he's even trying to find goals. If he can't get goals, he'll never win games which keeps the door open for opposition to come at us because we have no security.
 
Red4ever27 said:
This is like saying we've gone from completely crap to slightly less crap. Which games in particular have we played a lot better in general? Newly promoted Southampton, and that took a penalty save or things could've ended very differently. First half against Palace maybe, I can't think of any others really where we have shown a clear 'marked improvement'.

The underlying stats are demonstrably better than last season because, well, it would be extremely hard to be worse than last season. It is something we shouldn't be comparing our current performances against if we want clear improvement.

For me it's his lack of adaptation, it's the same formation each game with the same instructions, with the same results. We are predictable and not a good predictable. There seems to be no in game management when things aren't working, no tweaks, no new ideas and it shows.

There's a reason not many are saying 'we look a lot better'. Hopefully I'm eating my words by the end of the season and he comes a big success.
Click to expand...
I’ve watched a lot of football this season, only 3 teams have looked really good so far. I’m under no illusions, nor should any of us be, that we are at the top of the totem pole but we should be aiming for 4th/5th in my opinion.

We were crap last season, of course, this season our results have been short of where we’d like them to be but I’m clearly making the point that there has actually been tangible improvement if we’re assessing what we’ve done in games. The amount of replies I get where people want to argue this seems bizarre as it’s literally just a fact. You can argue stats are meaningless, sure, or you can dispute specific areas where it says we are better that you disagree with but no one is saying that.

I can’t work out what you would think is a realistic position we’d be in right now. Had we beaten palace, which we should have done, we’d be 4 points off the top. Would that be good enough?
 
tomaldinho1 said:
14th to 5th in a table of 20 are close together?
Click to expand...

My bad.

I didn't notice that the Sky article was calculating these things based on an accurate knowledge of all 38 games in the 24/25 season.

I was just going off a grand total of five games that I've watched so far, which range from average to shit.
 
Hand-waving away last season as the result of freak injuries whilst simultaneously praising ETH for improvement in performances since last season is having your cake and eating it too.
 
baskinginthesun said:
This is his 3rd season now. Besides all the nice looking stats, where I'll agree have improved, his biggest problem is that he fails to find goals in the team.

3 seasons now and we still have trouble finding the back of the net. We got away with it in his first season, last season we didn't, and it seems we are just continuing the trend this season.

So his attacking setup doesn't work. I'm still not sure how he's even trying to find goals. If he can't get goals, he'll never win games which keeps the door open for opposition to come at us because we have no security.
Click to expand...

The amount of chances we just don’t put away is scandalous really, I feel a bit sorry for him, sometimes it’s harder to miss but we find a way, I’m sure he’s not coaching that..
Rashfords form was helping Ole look much better than he was, if we had him firing again the pressure would be nowhere near as intense, and Bruno has now randomly decided that he can’t pass, create or shoot.. it’s a tough time for the team really, we’re desperate for someone in front of goal to find form
 
He’s giving us bald lads a bad name at this point. Unacceptable.
 
Big Ben Foster said:
Hand-waving away last season as the result of freak injuries whilst simultaneously praising ETH for improvement in performances since last season is having your cake and eating it too.
Click to expand...
It’s the same sort of stupid logic that we heard last winter, and then when you prompt people with “what would make you turn against him?” It just ends up being them needing to see a full season of poor performance and results (and then often they kick the can down the road again and cite another excuse as to why Ten Hag has been unlucky, or worse they write love letters asking INEOS to keep him)
 
Oscar Bonavena said:
Can ETH backers outline what they think his greatest strengths are.
Click to expand...
Isn’t that obvious ? He is keeping his job while playing sh*t football and having sh*t results for mot then 18 months. The guy is effectively Harry Potter. Never seen such a good illusionist.
 
tomaldinho1 said:
Ok, we bet? If ETH stay until qualification is over, I think we’ll go through. You don’t.

What does the winner get?
Click to expand...

Put in context, we're the bookies and pundits joint favourites to win the entire competition. But if ETH stays long enough, form and eyes tell us we'll finish mid-table at best, and we'll lose in the playoff or ro16 game to another Copenhagen or Galatasaray-level side.

That's what happens when you back a loser.
 
tomaldinho1 said:
Why are you so vulgar? It’s literally an entire seasons stats plus this seasons.
Click to expand...
Because I’m quite sick of people living in denial at this point, or worse being accepting of going toe to toe with average Dutch league sides or mid table PL teams.

It’s fine, keep backing him and then raise your hand up months from now and admit defeat if that’s what you wish to do. But I’m not going to pretend to take any data set seriously that involves only a month of matches, especially because in spite of it there are still clear issues with how he approaches games and managing them during the 90 minutes.

I’m quite tired of being a comedy club for a decade plus now, slightly improving performances while still getting poor results in a 3rd year of management, while he’s been backed better than any manager we’ve had post SAF, isn’t good enough
 
HookedOnAPhelan said:
Not saying he shouldn't be sacked, but man, so many people on here are going to be so disappointed when we sack Ten Hag and are still shit.
Click to expand...

So you're saying everyone should just resign themselves to the idea that we'll be shit regardless of who the manager is and just abandon all hope of United ever being a force again?

That's the spirit.
 
A goal difference of + 1 after 57 league games since the Carabao Cup win, this manager makes me sick
 
JJ12 said:
Who would you replace him with, RVN? And try and persuade Tuchel or someone else?
Click to expand...
Who cares ? Players don’t respond or believe to his poor management. Just someone fresh. The tea lady will get better results actually.
I don’t think it’s hard to improve from 8th in the league and 0 goal difference.
This argument make him look like a good manager. There are plenty who will do a better job with this squad. It’s not like we are looking for someone who will stay 25 years. Supporters need to stop with the SAF syndrome.
 
Give it to Ruud and get Amorim in next summer. Don’t care if we have pay £20m for his release clause.
 
Teja said:
For what it's worth, I voted to back him after the Liverpool game. My reasoning there was we should've sacked him in the summer for Tuchel but given we decided to stick, sacking him after 3 games makes no sense and Hake / RvN as interims will probably do worse than him.

I'm wavering now but just left it on keep mostly due to inertia but also a couple of different factors:

1. The data is not that bad, pretty high up the table in xG, npXG, chance creation, xGA etc.

2. Sample size is too small, I'll probably wait until the second international break and get some more games in before flipping the vote. Yes, the previous two seasons count as sample sizes but the picture is still hazy. Obviously not good enough last season but has the injury excuse and he managed a pretty decent first season with a worse squad and more chaos (Ronaldo, Greenwood sagas) than we have now. If we match his first season's points total that's good enough for me and should be doable.
Click to expand...
Some of you guys are funny man. You want him gone after 50 games of shite but then back him after 3 more games because it isn’t enough? but after 7 games he can get to feck. Then judging him on every stat except points, wins and goals scored. My friend, let’s sit down and have a chat about this sport called football and what separates good teams from bad ones.
 
stevoc said:
So you're saying everyone should just resign themselves to the idea that we'll be shit regardless of who the manager is and just abandon all hope of United ever being a force again?

That's the spirit.
Click to expand...
Yes, exactly this.

Brilliant, well done.
 
Stadjer said:
Well he is not wrong about that. The team clearly is not a finished product and a work in process. He is atleast partly to blame for that though, the work he is doing on the team isnt really developing as fast as we would hope.
Click to expand...
It’s a work in progress because he’s making every player worse.
 
big_jeffstar said:
The amount of chances we just don’t put away is scandalous really, I feel a bit sorry for him, sometimes it’s harder to miss but we find a way, I’m sure he’s not coaching that..
Rashfords form was helping Ole look much better than he was, if we had him firing again the pressure would be nowhere near as intense, and Bruno has now randomly decided that he can’t pass, create or shoot.. it’s a tough time for the team really, we’re desperate for someone in front of goal to find form
Click to expand...

Rashford actually had great form in ETH's first season for the initial 5 months or so. 25 goals in 41 games, he scored 31% of our goals up until the 7-0 Liverpool result. After that he's scored 16 in 72 games. That incidently was ETH's best run of form too. Since that 7-0 Liverpool broke the club, we've been goddamn awful since other than the FA Cup win.
 
hobbers said:
Put in context, we're the bookies and pundits joint favourites to win the entire competition. But if ETH stays long enough, form and eyes tell us we'll finish mid-table at best, and we'll lose in the playoff or ro16 game to another Copenhagen or Galatasaray-level side.

That's what happens when you back a loser.
Click to expand...
So, no?

Re favourites, I would hope we get QF minimum and would like to think it’s something we have a good shot at winning.
 
Valencia Shin Crosses said:
Because I’m quite sick of people living in denial at this point, or worse being accepting of going toe to toe with average Dutch league sides or mid table PL teams.

It’s fine, keep backing him and then raise your hand up months from now and admit defeat if that’s what you wish to do. But I’m not going to pretend to take any data set seriously that involves only a month of matches, especially because in spite of it there are still clear issues with how he approaches games and managing them during the 90 minutes.

I’m quite tired of being a comedy club for a decade plus now, slightly improving performances while still getting poor results in a 3rd year of management, while he’s been backed better than any manager we’ve had post SAF, isn’t good enough
Click to expand...
Why am I living in denial for pointing out the underlying metrics have improved?
 
tomaldinho1 said:
Why am I living in denial for pointing out the underlying metrics have improved?
Click to expand...
The problem is your suggestion that they’re underlying metrics, that suggests they’re the foundations of winning football matches. We could camp in our own half and have 90% possession, it doesn’t mean we’re winning games.
 
stevoc said:
So you're saying everyone should just resign themselves to the idea that we'll be shit regardless of who the manager is and just abandon all hope of United ever being a force again?

That's the spirit.
Click to expand...
I'm on board for this.

Have no expectations. Have no disappointments.

It's minimalism for the mind.
 
crossy1686 said:
The problem is your suggestion that they’re underlying metrics, that suggests they’re the foundations of winning football matches. We could camp in our own half and have 90% possession, it doesn’t mean we’re winning games.
Click to expand...
Sorry do you think underlying metrics matter or not, I don’t follow? The article is pretty detailed, not sure how you could look at it and think we’ve duped the stats.

I agree re possession by the way, but I’m not arguing possession = good.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.