Blood Mage
2+2=united are rubbish
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2019
- Messages
- 8,525
Not sure if oppo fan or just delusional.I still believe in Erik. This 24 hour media cycle is monstrous, and it loves feeding on United.
Not sure if oppo fan or just delusional.I still believe in Erik. This 24 hour media cycle is monstrous, and it loves feeding on United.
How anyone can look at the last 18+ months and feel that Ten Hag can be a success here is truly beyond me.I do actually think he can be a success here, but it feels like he is dangerously close to losing the players. A lot of his players are still not up to full fitness or played together for a very long time. It's not a surprise our best players have played with each other before (Onana, Mazraoui, De Ligt, Martinez). Defenders don't win you matches when you can't score though, so it's a bit moot. If we can't get the attack scoring and the midfield playing, he's a done for. One positive is that he leaves a very solid defensive base for a new manager to build on.
What have you seen that makes you believe in him still? What progress are you looking at? Everything points to the longer he is here the worse it gets.I still believe in Erik. This 24 hour media cycle is monstrous, and it loves feeding on United.
I never understood why some people take that obnoxious piece of lard seriously.Whoa! Stop the thread guys! Ste Howson says sacking him shouldn't be an option!!
That's fair enough, but he's shown he can win individual big games, resulting in cups. Which means he has tactical nouse and can motivate a team. Sunday was bad, but I generally think we've not actually played that bad this season, bar our finishing. So I don't think it's particularly far fetched that we can be successful, obviously that requires improvement - which isn't guaranteed at all, but I think our new players will improve and I hope players like Garnacho, Rashford, Zirkzee, Amad, Bruno and Hojlund can start finishing these chances we are creating.How anyone can look at the last 18+ months and feel that Ten Hag can be a success here is truly beyond me.
At this point surely it's one person with multiple accounts posting this nonsense? How can there be so many of you?That's fair enough, but he's shown he can win individual big games, resulting in cups. Which means he has tactical nouse and can motivate a team. Sunday was bad, but I generally think we've not actually played that bad this season, bar our finishing. So I don't think it's particularly far fetched that we can be successful, obviously that requires improvement - which isn't guaranteed at all, but I think our new players will improve and I hope players like Garnacho, Rashford, Zirkzee, Amad, Bruno and Hojlund can start finishing these chances we are creating.
That's all fine but I'm just wondering how good was actually that Ajax side, has anyone watched them regularly or is it just something people say? It seems like he came here with undisputed reputation of a good coach, but I don't place him higher than Ole. Quite the opposite actually.I think it should be pretty obvious by now that implementing a strat/style philosophy at Ajax in the Eredivisie is not directly translatable/transferable to a big "chasing" club in the PL. Being the powerhouse in the Eredivisie and being lucky with getting the best generation in ages through the academy makes it easier to succeed. The squad he had at his disposal there was just ridiculous compared to the rest of the league, but would still struggle get top 8 in the PL. That's his problem and it seems it is his only recipe.
They were good enough to win the league and get one deep run in the CL.That's all fine but I'm just wondering how good was actually that Ajax side, has anyone watched them regularly or is it just something people say? It seems like he came here with undisputed reputation of a good coach, but I don't place him higher than Ole. Quite the opposite actually.
Well if you look at our actual underlying stats or the chances we create during games, we should have scored double the goals we currently have. Our defence looks good, but our midfield hasn't improved. We knew that was going to be the case when we didn't sign Ugarte, who we chased all window, until the last minute. Based on our problems last season, there's been improvement in chance creation, but a decline in finishing. We look a bit better at the back, but just as bad in midfield - mainly as we haven't change the personnel. I want it to be better, but we didn't prioritize midfield in the summer.At this point surely it's one person with multiple accounts posting this nonsense? How can there be so many of you?
I'm now wondering are they allowing the season to capitulate under Ten Hag to justify raising ticket prices next season to offset no European football.
There’s a saying in corporate “culture eats strategy for breakfast”. So yeah, managers have all ended up “failing” but the rot started at the top (Glazers, Woodward & the type of players they signed etc).It's not correct to just single out the managers imo. The club has been an absolute disaster from top to bottom for years.
I'm a bit calmer, or maybe apathy has taken over - but I do feel a bit better about the future. Ten Hag won't be the manager, and I do think the hierarchy are serious about challenging by 2028. We are still only a few months under the new structure, and they are clearly planning for the future - the young signings and stadium plans are evidence of this. Ten Hag will not be our manager within the next month, let's see what the hierarchy are about because this will be their first challenge and they have done well up until now. Remember, Ashworth and Berrada were not involved in keeping Ten Hag, but they will oversee his removal and replacement - they deserve a chance to see what they can do.
I like him a lot but I wonder about how easy it is to put that style into a top club where the egos are difficult to mould. If you think of some of the really excellent coaches of the last 5 years who kept really poor teams up by being elite pressing and aggressive teams - Iraola, Hasenhuttl, Bielsa I’d argue did wonders with an initially average team - I’m not sure many of the top players we have possess the mentality to go into such a system where off the ball work is so taxing.I agree Iraola is a top coach but I feel "championship level squad" is a bit harsh, they may not have the best depth but they do have some real quality in their starting 11.
I do actually think he can be a success here, but it feels like he is dangerously close to losing the players. A lot of his players are still not up to full fitness or played together for a very long time. It's not a surprise our best players have played with each other before (Onana, Mazraoui, De Ligt, Martinez). Defenders don't win you matches when you can't score though, so it's a bit moot. If we can't get the attack scoring and the midfield playing, he's a done for. One positive is that he leaves a very solid defensive base for a new manager to build on.
That's all fine but I'm just wondering how good was actually that Ajax side, has anyone watched them regularly or is it just something people say? It seems like he came here with undisputed reputation of a good coach, but I don't place him higher than Ole. Quite the opposite actually.
Nothing but pure delusion, or as the kids call it these days “copium”.At this point surely it's one person with multiple accounts posting this nonsense? How can there be so many of you?
That's fine but remember that Ole had to put up with Maguire, Lindelof, AWB, McTominay, Fred, aging Matic and half arsed Pogba as the half of the team. He did have stronger forwards but that football was not really worse than what we've seen under Ten Hag, who has much better resources at his disposal.Ole had the exact same issue. A fair few on here said he played much better football with Molde but couldn't implement it here. The same has happened to ETH so it needs to be a cautionary tale.
That's fine but remember that Ole had to put up with Maguire, Lindelof, AWB, McTominay, Fred, aging Matic and half arsed Pogba as the half of the team. He did have stronger forwards but that football was not really worse than what we've seen under Ten Hag, who has much better resources at his disposal.
There has to be a pivotal moment at some point where one game or certain fixtures change the tide.How can your desire for the direction of the club be based on a constant coin flip, one off game type of strategy? That's an incredibly shortsighted and dumb approach, and I'm sure you're a relatively intelligent person. Do people get caught up in backing an opinion to such an extent that they end up dead on that hill finding it hard to admit they were wrong?
Yet we all know that there's not a single manager on the planet who could have been successful over the last 10 years with the way the club has been run.
Craig Burley is spot on here
Well if you look at our actual underlying stats or the chances we create during games, we should have scored double the goals we currently have. Our defence looks good, but our midfield hasn't improved. We knew that was going to be the case when we didn't sign Ugarte, who we chased all window, until the last minute. Based on our problems last season, there's been improvement in chance creation, but a decline in finishing. We look a bit better at the back, but just as bad in midfield - mainly as we haven't change the personnel. I want it to be better, but we didn't prioritize midfield in the summer.
So if i just take Brighton and Palace, where we should really at minimum be getting a draw and win if we could finish our chances, we'd be on 10 points. I'm not denying the Spurs and Liverpool games were terrible and I think there are varying reasons as to why they were such bad performances, but a large part for me is midfield. That's the area we didn't prioritise this summer, so it's not really a surprise.Yeah, if our strikers managed to convert the 0.3 xG at half time against Spurs, or 0.1 xG at half time against Liverpool into goals, then we would have been so much better off. All these top chances these fecking players keep missing.
I mean, Cook, Christie, Semenyo, Tavernier and Smith. They are very much championship level to me. Iraola would be my choice for a manager in the league, for what it's worth. Something about that region creates quality managers!I agree Iraola is a top coach but I feel "championship level squad" is a bit harsh, they may not have the best depth but they do have some real quality in their starting 11.
The discussion was about stability in the club regarding criticism of fans who believe that a manager can come in, build and stay for a long term period of success like Fergie. My argument was that no manager on the planet could've achieved that under the circumstances. Am I wrong?You guys just get here and say anything![]()
Even that analogy at the end was perfectly put, considering what happened this summer with the "appointment"(or whatever you want to call it) of ETH.Craig Burley is spot on here
Yet we all know that there's not a single manager on the planet who could have been successful over the last 10 years with the way the club has been run.
Utter nonsense. Every manager that's been here has commented on the state of the club. It's been mentioned already on this thread but the likes of Klopp stayed clear of us because they could see what a shitshow the club was.Really?
A billion quid to spend over the last decade, able to attract 90% of the players on the planet, massive fanbase, big stadium.
I'd say its the other way around. There shouldn't be a manager capable of measing that up.
Yet we all know that there's not a single manager on the planet who could have been successful over the last 10 years with the way the club has been run.
The discussion was about stability in the club regarding criticism of fans who believe that a manager can come in, build and stay for a long term period of success like Fergie. My argument was that no manager on the planet could've achieved that under the circumstances. Am I wrong?