Worth noting that City also hired Txiki Begiristain as their director of football in 2012, so Guardiola had 4 years of groundwork laid out for him when he arrived at City. City also had some really staggering transfer dealings when Guardiola got there.
First Season:
CB John Stones €55.60m
RW Leroy Sané €52.00m
ST Gabriel Jesus €32.00m
AM Ilkay Gündogan €27.00m
GK Claudio Bravo €18.00m
LW Nolito €18.00m
Second Season
CB Aymeric Laporte €65.00m
LB Benjamin Mendy €57.50m
RB Kyle Walker €52.70m
AM Bernardo Silva €50.00m
GK Ederson €40.00m
CB Danilo €30.00m
Plus the squad already had Vincent Kompany, Yaya Toure, Fernando, Fernandinho, Kevin De Bruyne, David Silva, Raheem Sterling and Sergio Aguero. The only real existing problem with the squad when Pep arrived was that their world class fullbacks were starting to get a bit old, despite still being very good.
It's also important to keep in mind that these transfers were all 6-7 years ago, before everything went even more crazy after PSG bought Neymar for 220 million euros. Guardiola got to do whatever he wanted with the squad, no questions asked. Bought a player who isn't good enough? We'll buy a replacement next year. Goalie doesn't fit your scheme? We'll feck him off immediately, wages and standing at the club be damned. Guardiola is operating on another plane of existence. His situation isn't comparable to that of ETH at all, and Klopp is still a huge stretch at best.
That's a very nice summary and i agree with it. The value of Begiristain's work lies in City targeting players whose core profiles fit the demands of modern football. This way, Pep was allowed the freedom to work on the details of his plan and make the necessary tweaks for it to be successful in the English game from day one. City's unlimited funds eliminated any possibility of a bad judgement affecting them either in the short or the long term.
Klopp is an interesting case because, when Liverpool get going, he really has a Fergie-like ability to squeeze every ounce of quality from the players he has at his disposal. You look at their line-up in the 2018 CL final - the one with Henderson, Milner, Wijnaldum in the midfield and Lovren, Karius at the back - and you rub your eyes. It can make a case for those who suggest that, if you spend the big bucks, you should deliver the goods sooner rather than later. The key here, and something that Klopp often mentions in his pressers, is that Liverpool set up the whole club in a way that the manager is allowed to focus on training and implementing tactics. Klopp set the frame and there are several pros who try, with Klopp at the helm, to create the final picture. It's in such an environment that the manager can say "i can use a player like Firmino who's a weird mix between a false #9 and a false #10 because he does most of the other things i want from an attacking player well, but i need goals from the wide areas", and the rest of the staff can pick Salah and Mane for about 70 million pounds combined. And let's not forget, they also got lucky twice in a position that has become quite important in the modern game. They got Robertson and TAA for basically nothing.
You simply can't compare this to the mess ETH walked into. Imagine being a manager who values building from the back, a high-line and aggressive man-to-man oriented pressing. You come to a club that spends close to 1.5 million p/w on wages for Ronaldo, Sancho, Maguire, De Gea and Martial. You have the Glazers as owners and, after the briefing with the United executives, you get on the plane for your first pre-season tour, referring to Fred as the player who will connect the lines and Martial as the player who can be trusted to lead the line. Everybody at United should thank their good fortunes he's a pragmatist. Otherwise, we were in for a very tough season.
You keep moving the goalposts. You add people leaving but wont add incoming for example. You say we lost Pogba but many lauded that as a positive because of his attitude and erratic performances. Its a hard thing to judge so I think I'll suggest this - lets say Ten Haag took over a year earlier and we didn't have all the down tools, worst manager ever half way through the season etc and all the othe teams were the same as they were that year. Would the team have come sixth? I doubt it. I would say 4th at least. Thats the team he inherited. Everything after - players leaving, incoming etc is after. He inherited a good team. Maybe not suited to his style and definately miles off Liverpool, Man City etc but definately not a team thats 10th and on the same level or worse as Tottenham, West Ham etc,.
It doesn't matter where the team had finished, if it wasn't fit for purpose. It could have finished 2nd in consecutive seasons and it still would not have made a difference. He would still need to do the changes he's doing now in order to implement his style. You can shrug your shoulders at his 3rd place + 2 Cup Finals, thinking that Mourinho's or Solskjaer's side produced the same results (or slightly better), but it's still a fresh beginning under a new approach. The hope is that, by the end of his (first) cycle, United will find themselves in the high 80s/ mid 90s in terms of points. Something that all the previous regimes failed to deliver. Especially the last two ones, which favoured a counter-attacking style and built the team accordingly. Thus, the change of direction.