erikcred
Full Member
- Joined
- May 6, 2022
- Messages
- 2,550
Why do people say this? Their second starting 11 is:
Ortega
Akanji Laporte ? Lewis
Philips Rodrigo
Mahrez Palmer? Foden
Alvarez
Our second starting 11:
Butland
Dalot Maguire Lindelof Malacia
McTominay Fred
Sancho Sabitzer Garnacho
Weghorst
There is hardly much difference between them. The keepers are meh, the defenses are quite comparable (one might argue that Akanji is a starter, but same can be said for Dalot), maybe United's is better. The midfield is pretty equal. Mahrez and Foden are better than Sancho and Garnacho. Sabitzer is better than Palmer. Alvarez is much better than Weghorst.
So an advantage to United in defense, and arguably in midfield. City has better attack. Neither squad is a starting XI though, if that was the starting eleven of City, they would be at best, at midtable.
First of all, people don't literally mean that there is a whole second set of 11 players who will end up in the top-4 if they played as City B. It means that they have many players who could easily slot into the first team with almost no drop in the overall quality.
Secondly, I'm sure you already see how flimsy your example is by the way you've casually waved aside Laporte, Mahrez, Foden and fecking Alvarez with some meaningless sentences.
Mahrez and Foden are better than Sancho and Garnacho? Yea we know that. But the point is by how much? And the answer is, by a country mile. Similarly, just saying Alvarez is much better than Weghorst is like saying Pep is much better than Sean Dyche, big whup. Which reminds me. They're still coached by Pep! If this team would be midtable, ours would be fighting relegation all season.
So, yea the people who say City have gathered a squad with two quality teams are absolutely right.