You take things extremely literally don't you?!
It happens. I am not going to assume what each and every posters motives in here are. I am going to rely on what is written. In case I get something wrong, I am happy to correct it.
66 posts in this thread, and every single one expressing a negative about ETH. I'm not really sure you are the correct person to be giving out advice out being balanced.
Yeah great job. Isn't it concerning for yourself, that the first thing that seems to come to your mind is digging into somebodies posting history to construct some agenda narrative to attack the poster with? I wrote quite a few things, shouldn't be too difficult to stick with what I wrote and attack the arguments there. But nevermind.
You must be fun at parties.
I get by, no worries.
Literally on the wrong side of everything there.
Expectations don’t evolve if the statement is “At the start of the season” or “After 2 matches”. You simply can’t evolve expectations unless all parameters stay the same.
But isn't that what I was saying? I made the distinction that pre-season expectations and expectations over the course expectations - it isn't the same thing. If we only talk about expectations and one group means pre season and the other one means the other it will always lead to disagreements.
If we had Varane and Martinez staying fit and Casemiro didn’t get two incredibly harsh Red Cards, and we didn’t play 120 mins plus pens, and Martial wasn’t made of paper, and Lindelof was this trustable in the first half of the season to enable the resting of Varane/Martinez, if Rashford had started the season well and if Eriksen hadn’t got injured in a properly foul incident… on and on and on we could go.
You are aware that such things occur to opposition teams as well, right? That is why starting such lists is BS from the very start onwards. When such reasoning or excuses (based on your perspective on a specific topic) are used, it will always cause conflict. (Not that thats something bad in principle, could as well be just a debate - even though knowing this place the chances are good it becomes personal pretty fast)
If everything went well, sure, evolve your expectations. Trying to pretend that rotating average players in, to not exhaust good players… straw man nonsense. If we’d played poorer players, we would have suffered poorer results. There’s no argument there. It’s silly.
I don't think its silly at all. If we are 2:0 up against a tricky customer and there are 30minutes to go, it is possible to sub for example Bruno or Rashford. Nobody asked about playing players that are known to be worse than the starters all the time, but some players have been overused in situations where there might have been the chance to sub them. I am also pretty sure I said it
MIGHT have been
ONE of the reason
S, which should indicate that I see different reasons as well. Primarily the brutal schedule. (I feel the view points of some posters are pretty United-centric, everything is connected with United, it is always United that acts and the whole world reacts. It is a give and take, and if teams that you consider as rivals based on squads and ambition are taking themselves out of the equasion due to bad luck or being unprepared, why wouldn't you adjust expectations. Imagine this season some sort of illness had struck that took out the whole teams of Arsenal, City, Liverpool, Brighton, Spurs and Chelsea - would you be fine getting Top4 behind Newcastle, Aston Villa and Brentford or Fulham? Of course not, because you didn't consider their squads to be equal to ourselves. Or turn it around, imagine a long term injury to Rashford, Martinez and Bruno at the world cup - do you think that many would have sticked to their pre-season expectations of top 4?)
But, bottom line, every single fan worth listening to, would have taken Top 4, getting rid of Ronaldo, establishing a clear idea of shape, winning the league cup, making an FA Cup Final and going deep in Europe as a wonderfully successful season.
To be honest, pretty difficult to consider you "worth listening to" if you make assumptions what other people should think or not or make statements about their listening-to-worthiness. And only to do you a favor: sure, from pre-season perspective such a season would sound pretty good.
Also worth saying: If we were playing Sheffield United in the Cup Final, everyone would be so positive right now, too. The looming embarassment colours things bad.
Well I am not sure what to say about that. You might be right, context always matters. But (in case this might be a thought of yours) I wouldn't draw conclusions that there wouldn't be some criticism if we had a chance of adding one additional trophy.
a) We don't know if we are to witness an embarassment, the odds are probably against us but who knows. B) I can tell personally that I'm not going to change my seasons evaluation based on one final. Whether we bring in one or two cups isn't that important to me, we managed to get into two finals, which is great. Great cup runs with a bit of luck in terms of draws but still great runs. Painful end of it in EL but whatever. Makes two great runs (national cups), one good to very good run (EL) and a season that is shaping up to be good to very good as well.
Is that really so far from your evaluation? Good to really good?