SAF first 4 seasons as MUFC manager:
11th
2nd
11th
13th
The previous 5 seasons saw the club finishing either 3rd or 4th.
The EtH critics in this thread would have been campaigning to sack SAF before the end of his first season, and everyone else would have joined them by the end of the 3rd.
Sorry but these comparisons had been done and explained to be Apple vs Orange scenario previously. Let me repeat the context:
SAF got the job because Ron Atkinson was doing badly where we were in
19th place (the league had 22 teams then). SAF saved us from potential relegation/relegation play off and brought us to top half of the table. Why do you sack someone who had an impressive CV, after he came to the rescue midseason and showed result?
Since 1985-1986 season for the following 5 seasons, English clubs were banned from European competitions. There was no difference between the 2nd placed loser and the rest of non relegated teams achievement wise. No consolation prize in UEFA Cup qualification. Basically win the league or nothing.
First full season, second place showed promise of the young SAF at the club. Second full season had a bad end, but until the free fall since latter half of February, SAF had us in top half of the table and as high as 3rd place in early February.
The third full season 89-90 was when the infamous Fergie out banner occurred, with us having an awful season in the league where we're in bottom half for most of the season, even with a potential relegation. The tension built up since previous season bad end. It's totally understandable why some people reacted the way they did. The FA Cup triumph at the end of this season, which gave us one of the few obtainable trophies English clubs could enjoy is huge. SAF admitted this triumph saved him. This is the real time where patience being tested because SAF put all his egg into winning the FA Cup to save his job. The board stood by him and gave him the end of the season.
Conveniently, 90-91 season saw that the ban was lifted for most English teams (bar Liverpool). We used this chance to win Cup Winners Cup which showed progress despite lukewarm 6th place finish in the league. Next season, we won League Cup, finished second in the league. And then PL triumph, and we all know what happened next.
The point being with context, it's not so black and white to take the top red stand condemning other fan for being impatient. The circumstances back then was very different. In modern day context, we're on a different level now. The club SAF took over had less league titles than Everton (they're a winning/title contender during this period), and Arsenal. We might see Liverpool as our biggest rival, but Liverpool at that time might see Everton a bigger rival and potential biggest rival for them than us. The club was not the biggest/richest club in the land. Expectation is much different. How prestige of the trophies, PL became the very top league, the priority had also been significantly changed.
"Giving time" excuses were not applicable to Moyes and Ole who didn't have the CV to back up any future promises of them as manager. Even when SAF with CV, needed those milestone to show the progress of his work. So once Moyes, Ole slipped, they had nothing cling to to ask for more time.
As for ETH, he's doing well. I don't see anyone calling for his head. Even if I miss those, it's so few in number in comparison to how large our fanbase is to really form any influence. Don't use that those minor unpopular to generalize all critics and demonize them same as the impatient because taking thing like league position out of context to make one point, you can't use context to argue about ETH doing better than Ole's 2nd and 3rd place finish for example.