He did. Funny that Rio his phone buzzed too. Exactly what Carragher put in that tweet
They are pundits and what they speak of is their right. It's their job. They are free to voice it out the way they like, just like I am free to do my job the way I see fit for our team's benefit.
There is a difference once they have an agenda
Yeah, that's why all that communicating about his role is bollocks, if he didnt missed preseason he'd be more fit and he'd have time to talk to ETH about his role. Saying it's ETH's fault he didnt communicate to Ronaldo about his role is horrible take by Rio and he keep avoiding the fact Ronaldo missed preseason cause it doesnt suit his agenda.
That's possible but tbh nobody knows. However if he left there's surely a better chance ETH could have persuaded the board to buy him a new striker. We'd also have like 500k off the weekly wages. It's already 24m a year. You throw in another 30m and you'd have a new striker I think. If he's young he'd be on 100k a week max or 5m a year.
Just kill it with fire.
And all of them included Man United paying 80% Ronaldo's wage. That's how football world values "Best player of all time"
This is not right. Ronaldo had started more than half our games since the international break. He played badly and lost his place, this is competition. He'd be incredibly daft if he needs to know how merit works. How can any player expect consistent selection when their performance is inconsistent? I'm not surprised though. last season when he threw that tantrum with Rangnick he was having a torrid game and still had the audacity to ask why he was the one subbed and not one of the younger players.
We have done both in the Europa, to be fair.
He did. Funny that Rio his phone buzzed too. Exactly what Carragher put in that tweet
I really like Carragher as a pundit honestly. And when you see the whole Ronaldo story he speaks all the right stuff unlike Rio and Keane who are just embarrassing themselves at this point.
That would completely destroy what's left between United and Ronaldo I think. Tbh I'd love to see that but imo from a business perspective our board would have to think twice before doing this. Ronaldo has a huge fanbase and they might want to do some business later with him. After all money talks. And all this should be kept as diplomatic as possible from United side imo. We won't look good either if we do that I reckon.
So what? If he would be right about everything, he would be a title winning manager, but he is just a pundit. Doesn't change the fact that his view on the whole Ronaldo at United saga seems to be spot on.
Oh I am not bothered at all by that, don't through me in the mix with those who are. Being friends with an idiot sometimes means you have to accept looking like an idiot yourself.
Thanks, will try to find it later, I have to work, life sucks.
You seem like a cheery soul who definitely fits into your own C category. Maybe D too but it's too early to say.
Yet our fans constantly bash Neville despite him loving the club, being one of our own, and being ever-present for us in our best years.
I'm sure not that's fair, I mean some definitely aren't worth listening to I agree but the reasons don't really stack up for me.
Rooney hasn't said too much but he's been pretty spot on too.
Just curious why promoting gambling a sell-out?
Maybe, he's not always right.
Neville campaigned for his mate Ole to get the job despite having no credentials for it, and campaigned for him to keep his job when it was clear we were wasting years under him. He was behind the "cultural reboot" and "likeable bunch of players" narrative that saw us waste 3 years and hundreds of millions all so one his mates could have a job he didn't deserve.
