He was horrific, but he still got better results than ETH.
My biggest gripe with ETH is what he mentioned yesterday in the presser, and has done multiple times before. He needs all his first teamers available to be able to play the way he wants. If even 2-3 are missing, his style collapses and he doesn't have ( or hasn't shown so far) the tactical nuance to be able to consistently get results. That for me is the biggest red flag, as we are essentially accepting we won't be able to deal with adverse circumstances if/when the next injury crisis hits. Of course, it could be next season there are no major injuries and he leads us to a glorious campaign, but does that prove he can overcome this weakness? For me, a manager at a top club should be getting results irrespective of the adverse circumstances. Sure, you can not win the league but you can't be dropping down to 8th either.
I try not to get involved in this ETH discussion too much because it's almost becoming like those silly Messi v Ronaldo or Ineos v Qatar debates where people just pick a side and defend it to the hilt. If he stays, like with all managers, I will fully support him and cheer for him at OT, hoping he gets us the league. But if it was up to me, I would be looking for a change.