Judas
Open to offers
Tuchel
[insert Gary Neville's uneasy oooooooooh noise here]
Tuchel
That the word on the grapevine?Tuchel
Fall for what? What exactly are you scared of hearing apart from the truth?
The clubs a shambles, as pointed out by every manager we have had since Fergie. Every single one hasn't had a good thing to say since leaving, surprisingly even Ole.
It's a bit of a trend.
Sorry but I disagree, Tuchel is the most sensible appointment we can make from the managers available. CL qualification is essential and McKenna is a big risk.After warming up massively to the McKenna idea, the dull inspired short shelf life appointment of Tuchel would be very disappointing once again.
Sorry but I disagree, Tuchel is the most sensible appointment we can make from the managers available. CL qualification is essential and McKenna is a big risk.
Correct. I'm actually more surprised people were so behind McKenna, a man who's never managed in the prem vs a manager who's won leagues and the CL.Sorry but I disagree, Tuchel is the most sensible appointment we can make from the managers available. CL qualification is essential and McKenna is a big risk.
Correct. I'm actually more surprised people were so behind McKenna, a man who's never managed in the prem vs a manager who's won leagues and the CL.
Yeah but we bin managers and demand they get sacked all the time.Yeah if we blindly follow the club line we must be traitors
What the actual feck sort of a narrative is that. The club has been a shit show and that's a mutually exclusive statement to how bad Ten Hag has been in one season.
McKenna is so unbelievably under qualified though. I get it with De Zerbi, but the jump would be absolutely ridiculous with McKenna.Because the unknown and mystery is a lot more exciting than managers we know exactly what to expect.
I don't agree with the people who don't want Tuchel purely because he's a "Chelsea reject" which is typically juvenile.
This is the key for me, it would be one thing if there were a solid number of good performances and a few great performances to fall back on when we were healthy this season, but there genuinely has not been a single comprehensively dominant performance all season long, and hardly any where you could actually say we were genuinely good and by far the better team. Sorry but that is not just down to injuries.Anyone who still gives the injury excuses should be made to rewatch the Brentford game
We started this team
Dalot
Varane
Lindelof
AWB
Mainoo
Mctominay
Rashford
Bruno
Garnacho
Hojlund
Maguire,Lisandro,Antony,Casemiro and mount came on as subs
By all accounts that is over 80% of my team fit and that is one of the worst performances I have ever seen from a United team. Brentford finished the league 16th and they absolutely battered us . They had 31 shots on goal and xg of 3.29. That game basically finished any hope for me that this guy can ever be good enough for us
Didn't manage to keep the Slotty news quiet though, did they? I'm expecting barely anyone knew the Klopp news, it's not a fair comparison.
Tan Hag didn't choose the prices for his signings, he was wrong in a lot of his choices, but it's the money men that decide to go as high as they did.
This is the key for me, it would be one thing if there were a solid number of good performances and a few great performances to fall back on when we were healthy this season, but there genuinely has not been a single comprehensively dominant performance all season long, and hardly any where you could actually say we were genuinely good and by far the better team. Sorry but that is not just down to injuries.
I don't think the treatment from the new owners that much terrible. Even with the bad results the owners largely supportive. They showed patience by ignoring media and supporters' high criticism.
Oh well you've convinced me nowYou don’t seem to understand football.
It's a perfectly fair comparison. Klopp leaving would have immediately triggered a search and approaches for new managers, yet they were able to announce Klopp was leaving. We have let it slip at the worst possible time and undermined the team before a cup final. It's so amateur.
Nope. He is responsible for the prices, too. He wanted these specific players he managed before, and pressed the club to get them. He wanted "unstoppable" Antony no matter what, the club refused because our scouts said he is not good enough, ETH still wanted him, the owners sided with ETH and supported him. Sure, the club should have just sacked him right there, it was obvious just from this incident that ETH is not very capable, but then you'd say that they hired and fired him in just a few months and never supported him.
Why would I say that? What are you blabbering about? I've wanted him gone for ages. It's just not black and white. I know for some of you on here it is, you either love Ten Hag or you hate him, in the real world there's a bit more to it than that.
You don't know any of what you've just stated as fact. You have no idea if he pressured anyone. Ten Hag failed, but the club has been overspending on players long before he showed up.
If we hired him in June, and fired him in August, without supporting him... you wouldn't complain? I would. Most of us would. Because we'd have no proof that he is really bad in every aspect of football management.
But in retrospect, they should have fired him just for wanting Antony at any cost.
Bloody hell you're just rambling that's the point you were making in the previous post?! Why? Sorry it just made no sense at all.
My second point is that ETH should have been fired early just for wanting Antony at any price. Because it a clear indication he isn't good at judging the ability of his own players.
Forget the price.
Wanting Antony at all, having managed Antony and Kudus together for 2 seasons (?), and paying any amount for Antony while completely ignoring the opportunity to sign Kudus, is criminally stupid. Shows that the guy must play favourites and can be blinkered about their shortcomings.
This. If one of my employee is under review for their horrendous performance and they started taking shots at me they are goner. This is even worse cause he's doing the shots in public for everyone to see and read. Can't imagine INEOS is pleased with his media antics. If anything his comments can be taken as undermining the upper management. Contrary to popular belief I think ETH has a few pals in the media that he uses to defend himself personally all the time (example Withwell)Plausible.
Not surprising. I remember Melissa Reddy on Sky a month or so ago saying that her sources were telling her that ETH is "talking himself out of a job".This. If one of my employee is under review for their horrendous performance and they started taking shots at me they are goner. This is even worse cause he's doing the shots in public for everyone to see and read. Can't imagine INEOS is pleased with his media antics. If anything his comments can be taken as undermining the upper management. Contrary to popular belief I think ETH has a few pals in the media that he uses to defend himself personally all the time (example Withwell)
Excluding trolls, over 300 still wanted to keep him
Having sympathy for a man that's been sacked very publicly doesn't make someone a bad fan. You can think he deserves the sack but also feel sorry for him - sympathy isn't a sign of weakness you know.Fall for Ten Hag being a victim, or feeling sorry for him. The bloke didn't do his job, he failed. I have no sympathy for him.
Having sympathy for a man that's been sacked very publicly doesn't make someone a bad fan. You can think he deserves the sack but also feel sorry for him - sympathy isn't a sign of weakness you know.
Agreed, I like him. He's conducted himself in a really dignified manner throughout. Definitely time for him to go though.I quite like Ten Hag actually.
Agreed, I like him. He's conducted himself in a really dignified manner throughout. Definitely time for him to go though.
Majority of fans do, this forum is on a level of Facebook groups nowadays. A poll of 1500 people? Actual, relevant polls, you know with 10k+ votes, indicate 70% of fans understand what’s needed for this club to change, and it’s not sacking a manager every 18 months.
So basically LVG all over again. We sure are consistent in how we treat Dutch managers.
Can you point to a single performance to show us what it is supposed to look like? As you're an expert.You don’t seem to understand football.