As for reasons in favour of Ten Hag we could point to a good first season, lots of finals, promotion and development of youth, dealing with culture issues and standards etc but none of us know if that’s enough or what would impress INEOS.
You've pretty much mentioned the reasons I'd give him another season in your own post.
(Couldn't quote your posts in full for some reason.)
Thanks for your replies.
I appreciate your ability to debate in a civil and intelligent manner, let me just say that. It's fast becoming a rarity.
As for the actual argument(s) you both offer - well, the one I can
easily buy is this: if the structural change hasn't actually been implemented fully, we should absolutely not make any decisions here and now.
Our next manager (i.e. head coach) should be appointed
after the structural changes are fully in place. No makeshift solutions, no knee-jerk appointments, no sacking him just because the fans want it - none of that. I think we agree 100% on that.
Where we differ is (I think) here:
a) I simply don't see it with him. I'm not impressed by him at all.
b) I can't get past the fact that he - himself - actually wanted the "manager" (not just "head coach") role. I think this is highly problematic for two reasons: 1) he shouldn't be rewarded with a "head coach" gig after his obvious failure as a "manager" and 2) surely, his authority must be undermined (from the players' perspective) if he now continues after what could easily be construed as a demotion: "Alright, we'll let you coach 'em, but you aren't really the boss anymore."
ETA To be clear, in the latter scenario I would prefer a new head coach - not one who gets the gig as a demotion (yes, that's putting it in extreme terms - but the point should be obvious).
To repeat my basic stance:
It
could make sense to give ETH a second chance under a functioning structure, i.e. as a head coach (with limited influence on transfers and other long-term decisions) - yes.
But he hasn't done anything whatsoever to convince me that he's a better choice than - say - Tuchel for a head coach role under the new regime.
And, lastly, the continuity angle (the "let's not sack another manager when the structure is the real problem" angle) doesn't really
work in his case. He isn't a brilliant head coach trapped in United's crap structure - that isn't what's been going on here, not in my opinion.