LawCharltonBest
Enjoys watching porn..with foxes
Since the subject of stats is active.. how close are we to having our worst PL season ever?
I'm not WUMing. Just because you decide that I am does not make it the case...Stop feeding the WUM. This has always been his MO. Was the exact same way in the Club Sale thread.
8th place, GD +1 which will end up in negative deserves one more season
Point wise, very. We need 5 to beat the Rangnick disaster season.Since the subject of stats is active.. how close are we to having our worst PL season ever?
You can only play whats in front of you and with the players not injured...Point wise, very. We need 5 to beat the Rangnick disaster season.
But hey, his win % is better than Arteta and Klopp's worst thanks to easy cup draws.
you'll be changing your mind again tonight.You can only play whats in front of you and with the players not injured...
Why is that?
The good news is we'll be able to sell him all our players because he only signs players that he's previously worked with.Come on Erik take that Bayern job you finally get to work with Kane next season
Why would I do that?you'll be changing your mind again tonight.
ThanksPoint wise, very. We need 5 to beat the Rangnick disaster season.
But hey, his win % is better than Arteta and Klopp's worst thanks to easy cup draws.
When, in the history of United, have we signed true marquee signings? And I mean proper signings, like Kane, Zidane, fat Ronaldo, Ronaldinho, Del Piero, Rivaldo, Figo, Davids, etc. The best of the best.It‘s true Hag didn‘t get marquee signings like Frenkie and Kane, whereas Mourinho got Pogba. But he did get other good signings, he has been backed.
Mourinho should shut up, he played atrocious football here.
The point is, if you want to challenge for the title right off, you need those marquee signings. Otherwise, it will take more time.
Why so sure?
We signed him on deadline day...not sure any manager is going to turn around and say 'fee is too high', especially with how we started that season.Nah that's bollocks, he might not be the one carrying out the negotiations but he's informed and will ultimately sign off on it. He thought it was fine to pay that amount for Antony (and the others) and if he doesn't have the brains to realise that impacts our budget elsewhere it's on him.
As a manager if you're signing a player you've already managed for such a fee you have to be very confident of their success.
He's talking like he's gone and needs to get some excuses out in the open so a new employer picks him up.His position is already untenable. The situation will become a lot more toxic after the losses against Arsenal and Newcastle. Handing City the double at Wembley will be the icing on a shit cake.
He is already gone. It's just a matter of making it official.
By that logic we should also give him a go the following season, and the season after that.
In fact that's what I expect most of his defenders to say next season if he does stay on. "Just give him another year, he'll turn things around!"
He said it is just bad luck in his press conference. He has been manager for 10 years and never experienced this.Man keeps crying about injuries but has never given an explanation as to why a lot of them happen during training sessions
No such thing, he just doesn't want to say that all the running he's making the players do without the ball is causing muscle related injuries.He said it is just bad luck in his press conference. He has been manager for 10 years and never experienced this.
We have had them but you are right: never like Madrid or Barcelona.When, in the history of United, have we signed true marquee signings? And I mean proper signings, like Kane, Zidane, fat Ronaldo, Ronaldinho, Del Piero, Rivaldo, Figo, Davids, etc. The best of the best.
It's not something we've ever done, we tried to under Woodward but he managed to get in a bunch of A-list pretenders that weren't fit to play for the likes of Madrid, Juventus and prime Barcelona. We should stop pretending we're Madrid, the Mbappe's of this world end up there, not in Manchester.
That is a huge assumption on your part. Do you have anything to back this up?No such thing, he just doesn't want to say that all the running he's making the players do without the ball is causing muscle related injuries.
Thats guessing.No such thing, he just doesn't want to say that all the running he's making the players do without the ball is causing muscle related injuries.
That is a huge assumption on your part. Do you have anything to back this up?
Someone once said you create your own luck. Maybe he was wrong?Thats guessing.
At this crazy rate, it cannot just be about bad luck IMHO.He said it is just bad luck in his press conference. He has been manager for 10 years and never experienced this.
I feel fairly confident he’ll still be here next season. The only real toxicity is here on the fan forum, there doesn’t seem to be as high a demand for a replacement from other outside sources. Possibly because the choices of replacements are so poor there is nothing that says vast improvement out there.His position is already untenable. The situation will become a lot more toxic after the losses against Arsenal and Newcastle. Handing City the double at Wembley will be the icing on a shit cake.
He is already gone. It's just a matter of making it official.
Since the subject of stats is active.. how close are we to having our worst PL season ever?
You can only play whats in front of you and with the players not injured...
I don’t know but I would assume it does mostly because he hasn’t managed 109 PL games…Oh so that win ratio includes Cup games as well then?
Interesting.
It‘s true Hag didn‘t get marquee signings like Frenkie and Kane, whereas Mourinho got Pogba. But he did get other good signings, he has been backed.
Mourinho should shut up, he played atrocious football here.
The point is, if you want to challenge for the title right off, you need those marquee signings. Otherwise, it will take more time.
You assumed (based on completely different people in an entirely different structure) that things would continue.
For the last 10 years, the players have had too much say.
When times get hard they down tools and wait for the next clean slate under the new manager.
The players need to know that there are consequences to poor attitude/form over time.
An underperforming player should be out the door in the following transfer window.
There is no obvious replacement for Ten Hag.
The team's performance this season comes with a lot of asteriscs. (Injuries, take-over, accusations of crimes)
The new CEO, TD, and DOF would know where to put the blame for this season and act accordingly.
I think Ten Hag has a CL clause that makes it easy to fire him if not met. (All previous Glazer hires had?)
So the fact that he is still in charge... I can't even imagine what kind of horror show INEOS has seen inside Carrington.
The bottom line here is. We have no clue what goes on inside Carrington.
And let's hope that the people who make the important decisions over the next years do.
I don’t know but I would assume it does mostly because he hasn’t managed 109 PL games…
Think it has got to do with the fans belief/confidence in the guys above the manager and also to an extent attitude of the players.Nonetheless I think United has a significant share of fans who think sacking a manager is generally a terrible thing. I don't get this feeling with fans of other clubs, where it is much more accepted that cycling through managers simply is a normal thing as sooner or later (almost) every manager hits the end of the road.
But what are you basing the idea that he wanted Timber ahead of Martinez on? How do you know he didn't want both equally?
Everyone thought Casemiro was a panic signing when he couldn't get DeJong but Ten Hag recently revealed he wanted both and his plan was for them to play together.
I mean its nearly two years ago now but it seemed like the pursuit of Timber happened earlier and we moved for Martinez after he said no and Arsenal were pursuing Martinez. It's possible he wanted Timber to play as a fullback too I suppose.