Martial also had a lot of bad games the last 2 years, if he played at all. But you are right. A true, number one, experienced striker could have made a big, big difference. There was one available, and willing. Harry Kane. You would have a very productive 25 goals a year striker and a good captain to boot. English, commercial values that would shade Rooney and CR7. Instead of 48 we could have 73 goals for now, dead certain top 3. The Glazers could have sold the club for at least 500 million more and England loving SJR would have paid that. The club could have started a difficult but in the end winning negotiation with Levy and show United still is a true, true top club.
But the Glazers said no.
Imo the most stupid decision they ever made. A lot of people concluded ETH overproduced last year and if they didn't back him with a big, serious revival - the one Rangnick said United needs, this drop back in results, performance, could be predicted. Even if you look at it from a selling point of view: why did the Glazers take a big gamble that a rookie striker, Mount and Onana would suddenly make us on par with Arsenal, LFC and City squad? The outrageous spending Chelsea? Guys like Kane usually aren't vailable, unless they themselve want to go. Kane wanted to go. They should have thrown the kitchensink in lawyers and managers at such a deal.