MadDogg
Full Member
Yep. In that aspect it reminds me a lot of LVG's time here.Exactly. Any team can get unlucky & lose but what we are witnessing is fundamentally poor coaching. Either, A) He’s telling them to do stuff they can not, in which case tailor the tactic of B) He’s unable to coach a cohesive system full stop. Either way this is not what Ineos should deem acceptable performance.
LVG had three huge problems. Firstly, he couldn't get the players in the team to play the style he wanted. Secondly, he proved unable to buy the players that would allow the team to play how he wanted. And thirdly, he wasn't able to adjust the style or set-up to get the most out of the players that he had. Put all three of those together and we were going nowhere.
ETH seems to be repeating all three issues, albeit the actual playstyle couldn't be more different. LVG just had us controlling the ball aimlessly without any real point to it, just passing the ball around between the defenders and midfielders and expecting our entire attacking threat to just be pulled out of moments of individual brilliance. Whereas ETH doesn't seem to care about controlling the ball at all, or to be more exact he seems to want to control it through individual brilliance instead of actually setting up a system to promote it.