ti vu
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2015
- Messages
- 12,799
If true, worrying signs because this pretty much confirms the cracks, between players, players-coaches relationshp.
Hope TheSUN just being TheSUN here.
I do worry about him taking us to Anfield,however as I have said many times we just can't have the leeches sacking another manager. I want us to get a new CEO and recruitment team in place then leave it up to them on what happens next.
I heard the new recruitment team has been set up and was actually overseeing the transfer last summer. So, they didn’t do well in the first window. Overpaying has been a continuation from the previous regime.I do worry about him taking us to Anfield,however as I have said many times we just can't have the leeches sacking another manager. I want us to get a new CEO and recruitment team in place then leave it up to them on what happens next.
I heard the new recruitment team has been set up and was actually overseeing the transfer last summer. So, they didn’t do well in the first window. Overpaying has been a continuation from the previous regime.
De Zerbi, like ETH, is a head coach not a manager. He will crumble under the chaotic structure here like Ten Hag has. Until we overhaul our structure we need a manager not a head coach. Ancelotti would be ideal for where we're currently at but not likely.If we lose to Fulham which seems likely, it's over.
Problem is, if we get De Zerbi or anyone at that matter, he'll be labeled as "fraud"too soon enough.
Truth is the frauds own United. Nothing really good will happen before they sell.
Drivel.
You don't have a clue or maybe you stopped watching us after the Carabao cup final.This is a good retort. With ETH struggling, many are now pulling theories out of their butt to fit the narrative. Not a peep about these 'issues' last year.
massive fan of the guy.
Love ETH but the writing is on the wall. I think he'll get the sack before the end of the month.
Anfield can't get any worse than last season, surely? And it's still only 3 points. I never expected us to win at Liverpool even when SAF was in charge tbh so I wouldn't put too much expectation on that fixture.
Hopefully Radcliffe can help to implement some changes to the structure above ETH. But I imagine it will be a slow process, unfortunately.
Why not just name another big club manager who has more players of his own but playing the same shit level of football.You can't honestly believe that. The lack of effort is pathetic, particularly when the ball is lost and players have to chase it to win if back.
Look how far Livramento travelled with the ball for the first goal. No one made any real effort to stop him, token run and a bit of a leg in. Then look at Dalot's efforts to make the run to defend the ball to Almiron. It wasn't even a token effort, he looked, saw him, knew he was there and only decided to run when it was too late.
Look how easy they got past 3 players for the second goal. Dalot was turned, outmuscled and made his usual lame efforts to defend the ball. That's just a weak player not giving 100%. Casemiro and Antony just stood and watched.
Look at the efforts to close down and win the ball back off Willock. Amrabat just runs into trouble, not one player looking for a pass. And not one player busting a gut to get back, all the defenders just back off and let him shoot. Maguire just lets a player palm him out of the way when he attempts a move. It's pathetic.
It's not really mostly his squad. While he is struggling to get a tune out his own players, that's just not true. He's signed 16 players 10 permanent, several of those are backups, 2 were free transfers, 6 of them were loans and 4 of those loans are already gone. He's only really brought in 5/6 players to be expected first team starters.
Onana - 55m - start
Martinez -50m - start
Casemiro - 40m - start
Mount - 55m - backup
Hojlund - 70m - start
Malacia - backup 13m
Antony - 80m - start
Eriksen - free - start
Bayindir - backup 5m
Evans - emergency backup
Reguillon - emergency loan
That's 12 players in the squad? We can really forget about Evans and Reguillon as they were only signed as emergency cover. Even if you include them it's still not even mostly his squad, not even half of it is his squad.
Its the sun. Don't even know if true or not. And when a crisis is around the corner, the vultures will start circling and usually find bits and pieces here and there to overblow it. Only works because mostly the fan base is so fickle. But look who I am telling thatWhy the hell is sensitive issues like this always reported on. I'd prefer the club to get on with such issues behind closed doors without the public knowing.
Now the fans will certain expectations and if the players/manager doesn't deliver there's yet more pressure.
If we lose to Fulham which seems likely, it's over.
Problem is, if we get De Zerbi or anyone at that matter, he'll be labeled as "fraud"too soon enough.
Truth is the frauds own United. Nothing really good will happen before they sell.
No doubt the manager has to shoulder some of the blame. But to say that his signings are failures because they lack physicality is bollocks. They were physical enough to compete last year and, if anything, we are more athletic this year with the additions of Hojlund over Martial and Mount over Eriksen (which I admit hasn't worked yet). I get that the team and ETH are underperforming, but making up theories about a supposed lack of physicality is just trying to find another angle to get rid of the manager.Why is it drivel? We are fecking diabolical. We are outplayed by literally every single team we play. The buck has to stop with the manager for what we see out on that pitch.
why do you love him?
Thats not a club statement.Why the hell is sensitive issues like this always reported on. I'd prefer the club to get on with such issues behind closed doors without the public knowing.
Now the fans will certain expectations and if the players/manager doesn't deliver there's yet more pressure.
You don't have a clue or maybe you stopped watching us after the Carabao cup final.
There is no narrative, it's things most people see except those that think ETH is infallible. Several posters brought up issues that about our setup last season, from Eriksen in midfield, Antony being shite, Casemiro losing his ability to cover ground etc. The drubbings we got last season were no coincidence and they are continuing this year.
Keep having your head in the sand.
Exactly. Halfway last season, around the Barcelona games, Ten Hag was really getting somewhere with United, and individual players. And he got there through his own doing: he wasn't inheriting Ole's tactics and trying to hang on to them. But somehow, things went downhill from there, and now especially this season.Exactly. It was such fantastic energy, but look at this season - the starting back 4 has been almost completely absent. To think that doesnt have an enormous knock on on everything else is insane. We are so vulnerable. Tell me liverpools second string back 4 for example, or arsenals. Make them play a third of a season with it. the form of everything will suffer. It doesnt account for a lack of effort though, so isnt the whole problem
Exactly. Halfway last season, around the Barcelona games, Ten Hag was really getting somewhere with United, and individual players. And he got there through his own doing: he wasn't inheriting Ole's tactics and trying to hang on to them. But somehow, things went downhill from there, and now especially this season.
It doesn't make sense that Ten Hag both was responsible for that uphill trajectory and is also an idiot who knows nothing about tactics and player development. But United's squad is arguably stronger right now, and Ten Hag if anything should know it better, and the PL as well.
So what changed? I would argue that the principal issue is that Ten Hag is having to adjust to playing a second-string defence of players that don't fit proactive high-line defending, therefore had to adjust his approach - and in the process messes up all aspects of his intended defensive and attacking play and patterns.
That's obviously on Ten Hag. Well, he can't help that United's squad is still so disjointed in its depth, that's due to United flipflopping on style for a decade now. But he probably could have managed the current situation better from a tactical viewpoint. That's not a reason to fire him though. I would say that he needs to be given time to train and play games with his intended first team. If things still suck then, then yes, time to go. But sacking Ten Hag because he isn't handling an absurd injury crisis well with this disjointed squad doesn't sound sensible to me.
No it absolutely doesn't. The manager can do great (alright he isn't at the moment) with the squad but this club is poisonous from the top and if you think that that culture will not eventually trickle down to the team itself then I have no idea what to tell you.Why is it drivel? We are fecking diabolical. We are outplayed by literally every single team we play. The buck has to stop with the manager for what we see out on that pitch.
Why is it a bad idea? I don't get it.If this is true, he's gone. These arent staff from the local Sainsburys. They're millionaire footballers. If they have a problem with you, then that's talking to them one on one is a terrible idea.
This was happening last season too, we get to the final third and everyone stops moving. Every player is covered and not a single one of them is moving to create space for another player or to receive the ball. We are only able to create chances when we're countering or from a one of those balls that Bruno produces out of nowhere. We've had a coach for set pieces for 3 years and we can't score and can't defend either, what exactly is he coaching?
After the game he said "It's a matter of time before we show our true selfs" . To which I asked myself who are we as a team on the field. The only way we get out of this is through a Rashford purple patch.
Why not just name another big club manager who has more players of his own but playing the same shit level of football.
In fact 12 new players of his own should be more than enough to at least make some improvements/progression. Rarely does any manager afford or need a wholesale change of 20+ players before making an impact.
Why the hell is sensitive issues like this always reported on. I'd prefer the club to get on with such issues behind closed doors without the public knowing.
Now the fans will certain expectations and if the players/manager doesn't deliver there's yet more pressure.
Which of the previous managers were expected to exceed realistic expectations immediately? We back managers and give them more time than most clubs do. Unless the issue is the definition of realistic expectations. Last season's 3rd place is for some reason portrayed as some sort of a miracle when even someone like Ole did it better and more than once.We surely won’t go for a small club manager with no track record of winning. If we sack EtH we’ll get a big name again I’m sure. But it doesn’t matter who they are, they will be labelled “past it” or a fraud, as you say. They will be expected to exceed realistic expectation immediately.
That's where he lost me. People say that he has been saying that for a while but I was ignorant.After his recent statement on his new playstyle at United, I'd want him gone inmediately if I were a United supporter. I mean, what the feck?
That's where he lost me. People say that he has been saying that for a while but I was ignorant.
The Sun is The Sun, for sure. But I’m very sure one-to-ones are happening because I would definitely do that. More or less every individual is suffering from loss of individual confidence and form. They are all losing their personal battles in matches and it’s at the stage where fixing the team means fixing the individuals in the team.If true, worrying signs because this pretty much confirms the cracks, between players, players-coaches relationshp.
Hope TheSUN just being TheSUN here.
Same, it's a good idea. But I also think it's too late to fix the issues now.Why is it a bad idea? I don't get it.
I read a lot of posts on this forum and it is pretty clear that a large, vociferous contingent just do not appreciate the scale of the task.Which of the previous managers were expected to exceed realistic expectations immediately? We back managers and give them more time than most clubs do. Unless the issue is the definition of realistic expectations. Last season's 3rd place is for some reason portrayed as some sort of a miracle when even someone like Ole did it better and more than once.
There was a bit of nuance to it, what he essentially meant was he couldn’t make United play like Ajax because United are United, but also because of the players…After his recent statement on his new playstyle at United, I'd want him gone inmediately if I were a United supporter. I mean, what the feck?
I read a lot of posts on this forum and it is pretty clear that a large, vociferous contingent just do not appreciate the scale of the task.