royboy16
Full Member
Can anyone summarize what's happened to us this season and why its gone this bad ?
He wont last the season at this rate.
He wont last the season at this rate.
Fair enough about Madrid if that's true.Really? Last time I checked, Real Madrid won 4 CLs in 5 years without massive advantages in possession.
We’re miles from a Brighton. And there’s consistency with their possession, they have been drilled to utilize the wings and switch fields of play quickly. We aren’t doing any of that.
Seems that we mostly agree then.There's not really anything to disagree with - you're talking about culpability in regards to our structure. Your words were - "No modern manager should have full authority over transfers". That's not the conversation I'm having, nor is it something I disagree with. I'm saying that we spent a lot on players he wanted and most of them have question marks hanging over them. Talent identification is important for managers even at clubs with a proper direction and DoF structure - it allows them to select teams and develop youth appropriately.
It is what it is.
Cmon, Sancho was never being selected for this match.Sancho.
But that would hurt his pride. So he decides to put his pride above the current club results. In the short term this looks like a mistake, in the long term we will see.....
He hit the winner against Burnley, for a start. I like Pellestri but he hasn't shown that he can contribute at the top level.Yes, Pellistri if needs be. He's a right winger with pace.
Playing Bruno on the right is something that has never worked and will never work, and yet he continues to persist with it.
If all that is true then the blame lies on Arnold, Murtough, and the Glazers for allowing it to happen.This actually has been extensively reported on and is probably similar at many clubs including City and Liverpool. ETH has veto power over transfers. Murtagh/ Fletcher / Scouts provide transfer targets, both through regular on the ground scouting as well as suggestions from coaching staff. Those targets are analyzed. ETH has veto power for any player he does not want. Period. He had to sign off on every transfer over his 3 transfer windows. We don’t know if he vetoed a bunch of other players, potentially good ones. But we do know he did not veto any of his signings. It’s also possible that he sent targets to the scouting team to analyze and confirm as targets (Antony, Malacia, etc).
As such, he’s absolutely at least partially responsible for our transfers.
Can anyone summarize what's happened to us this season and why its gone this bad ?
He wont last the season at this rate.
Its just like Mourinho final season, or Ole final season when they get the sacked. High expectation at the start, yet something went wrong and we keep getting worst and worst, and everyone can see we are heading to car crash, yet no one could point out exactly where's the problem coming from.
He hit the winner against Burnley, for a start. I like Pellestri but he hasn't shown that he can contribute at the top level.
Why is Casemiro playing more like an 8 than a DM , this must be ETH instructions, Mount is not an 8 or even a decent 10. Stop experimenting and put players in their normal positions.
Yeah I tend to agree with you. Bruno could be dropped with no complaints. I'd love to see Mount given a few games as a 10.That's our problem, playing players out of form, out of position, in the hope that they might, possibly, maybe, produce a "moment" once every 10 games.
Madness.
I mean that’s a common issue every single manager post Ferguson has faced. They maybe only ever have one player performing well and it’s never consistent and the rest are horrible.My biggest issue with him is that I don’t feel any player significantly improves under him. I understand that he’s caught in the Glazer spiral of mediocrity, but that he cannot make a single player better than he was is worrying in my view
It's probably true (I can't be bothered to look at numbers), but RM won no CLs with Mourinho's ultra-counterattacking style, and won much more with Modric, Kroos, Isco as key midfield players (those guys could keep the ball).Fair enough about Madrid if that's true.
Fair enough about Madrid if that's true.
What's that got to do with dropping underperforming players?
When this was said, it was based on fact at the time.Almost funny how people were saying that he is our best manager in post-SAF era. He is in course to be our worst manager in post-SAF era and this season is making Ole/Rangnick season look great in comparison.
Funny how I almost completely agree with your analysis but want to get rid of this rebuild thinking once and for all instead of reinforcing it.Reflecting on this again...it seems to me that ETH has tried to change too much too soon.
In fairness to ANY footballer, it must be incredibly difficult to completely change the way you have played for years overnight. Johnny Evans actually alluded to this in his post-match interview following the Burnley game.
Last season, we looked, by and large, to be a fair/good football team. We looked compact, we kept plenty of clean sheets, we carried a goal threat. Most of all, we looked organised.
This season, we look an absolute mess. We've got huge, gaping holes all over the pitch and players popping up in all sorts of unorthodox positions that don't seem to suit them. We don't appear to be a possession team, or a long ball team, or a transition team...its not clear what we are.
I am 100% of the belief that our problems are tactical. I'm sick of hearing about the Glazers and Arnold and Murtough. I have made the point elsewhere, if we were talking about winning major trophies i.e. competing with the Oil Cheats, then yeah, I'd understand the argument that that's going to be extremely difficult without a world class management team.
However, they're not the reason we can't beat Palace, Galatasary or Brighton at home. The squad we have should be more than good enough to win those games and achieve a respectable league position.
For me, the problem is that we've changed too much too soon. OK, so I see the advantages of squeezing up the pitch, of moving full backs into midfield, of having CBs run forward to receive passes, of having a single pivot, of having four AMs occupying the half-spaces to overload the opposition, of having a ball-playing goalkeeper and of having a target-man style forward...but is it a good idea to implement all of those things at once?
What chance do the players actually have of learning that system in what accounts to a pre-season of about 6-8 weeks and then whatever time they get in between the 60-odd matches we play each season?
Would it not have been far, far better to implement these changes slowly, gradually working on one or two things at a time? It's like we're haunted by this spectre of Sir Alex Ferguson, our History and the Oil Cheats dominance of the modern era. We're rushing to do everything, as if we can fix this all in one season.
A full rebuild, which this is, should be considered a 5YR project. Gradually implementing the system we want and slowly buying the players we want, as the budget allows.
The big problem we have is, no manager ever gets to stay for 5YRs because we blow-up, we have a bit of relative success, achieve a decent league finish...and then we immediately rip-off the stabilisers and end-up going straight over the handlebars at 40mph.
We've got to get used to the idea that there's no quick fix to this. Many people say that, but I don't think they really understand the extent of it. For example, we talk about Spurs improvement under Ange, as an argument for the idea that change can happen fast...but all he's done is organise them and improve the spirit, with a few minor tactical tweaks. The baseline expectation is so much lower.
They might have a half-decent season, but they won't win the league...and if eventually IF that becomes the expectation, they'll almost certainly fail and blow-up like we do regularly.
So to summarise - we need to stop rushing! We need to stop having one decent season and then completely changing the way we want to play in search of the 90+ points we need to win the league. Change should be slow, careful and deliberate. There needs to be an acceptance that a period of boring stability is needed before we can really start hunting major trophies. Three of four consecutive seasons of Champions League finishes and small, steady tweaks on the pitch would frustrate the fans - but we've got to stop this cycle.
We played dogshit for large parts of last season and we’re getting consistently humiliated in away matches. To say that, it was very premature. But then we have seen this happening forever. Every current manager is the best thing ever, and every transfer window is the best we ever had, and every group of players is the most likeable ever. Then the reality happens, and in order, the likeable players become bottlers and don’t play for the manager, then we realize that they are not that good, then we say that ok the manager apparently is not great but who is there to replace him (as in we are replacing Guardiola), and then finally we say that he was shit.When this was said, it was based on fact at the time.
His win/loss ratio was particularly high around the league cup final last season.
Same as how you can now add in the losses ever since and change the script, funny how that works right?
Funny how I almost completely agree with your analysis but want to get rid of this rebuild thinking once and for all instead of reinforcing it.
Don't try to win the title in five years, try to be better than last season every season. Keep changing everything you have to when you see the need for it, including the manager, DoF and other staff as well as players. Which is almost the same as you said just that I do want to include more positions as potentially open for change.
But as you said the key in this is doing a gradual change every time. United tends to write off everything the last manager did and call every of his signings "deadwood" instead of actively looking for a way to take the existing squad and work with that when you change the manager.
Keep seeing posts like this and I don't really understand. You back him but you fully expect things to get worse. Is the backing him because you don't want to admit we need to change or is it just in hope that after it gets worse it gets better?I still back him, but I fully believe this is the season our lovely unbeaten in the league at OT when ahead at half time record finally dies. The reaction will be apocalyptic. We're seeing so many negative records under him, just feels right
I went in 2 footed a few weeks back after a few beers and said he may be the worst manager we've had post SAF. I haven't deviated from that view in honesty.Just seen this on Twitter.
Records broken so far this season -
- Galatasaray hadn't won a game on English soil in 117 years of existing, until Erik Ten Hag.
- Manchester United had never lost the opening 2 CL group games, until Erik Ten Hag.
- Manchester United had never conceded 7 goals in the opening 2 CL group games, until Erik Ten Hag.
- Manchester United had never conceded 3+ goals in back to back CL games, until Erik Ten Hag
- Galatasaray hadn't scored in or won an away goal in the CL since 2015, 3 in one game as soon as they meet Erik Ten Hag.
- Manchester United hadn't lost 4 of the opening 7 games in PL history, until Erik Ten Hag
- Manchester United haven't had as few as 9 points from the opening 7 games since 1989, until Erik Ten Hag
- Manchester United hadn't conceded 4 goals in a CL group game in 28 years, until Erik Ten Hag.
- Manchester United hadn't conceded 3+ goals in 3 consecutive games since 1978, until Erik Ten Hag.
- Manchester United had never lost at the Tottenham Hotspur stadium, until Erik Ten Hag.
- Manchester United hadn't lost the opening two away games since 1973-74, until Erik Ten Hag.
- Manchester United hadn't conceded more than one goal in 4 consecutive league games since 1979, Until Erik Ten Hag.
- Manchester United had never conceded 2 goals in the opening 4 minutes of a PL game at Old Trafford, Until Erik Ten Hag
- Manchester United had never conceded 23 shots in one game at Old Trafford in PL history, Until Erik Ten Hag
- Brighton had never won twice in a row at Old Trafford, until Erik Ten Hag.
- Manchester United hadn't lost 6 of their first 10 games in all competitions since 1986, until Erik Ten Hag.
- Manchester United hadn't conceded 18 goals in the opening 10 games since 1967, until Erik Ten Hag.
Keep seeing posts like this and I don't really understand. You back him but you fully expect things to get worse. Is the backing him because you don't want to admit we need to change or is it just in hope that after it gets worse it gets better?
I don't think so. The club signed several dogmatic managers who didn't really fit what was played before instead of more pragmatic managers.To be fair, I think fans do this more than the club itself.
That's true I guess, but the records are tumbling fast, just like they did since Moyes but these ones are worse.I mean in theory we could win every other game and just lose one to end the record, so I'm not exactly saying I expect things to get worse. Obviously its bad right now though.
I don't feel at the point where sacking him is our only choice. I really don't, not yet. Last night worried me though. But the alternative option doesn't make sense to me yet.
The EtH statement to the fans seems to indicate that the Glazers have spoken with him already. He specifically mentioned "the Directors".