TsuWave
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2013
- Messages
- 15,741
They could actually be the cheapest on the market or work the fastest, who bloody knows. They're a massive agency, it's not exactly like Big Sam's mate or Fergie's son.Even if it did hold any weight; why the feck are we being manipulated by an agency? Or is Ten Hag now head of recruitment as well as head coach and manager.
With an awful gambling habit, or did have.He's such a cnut that pinocchio nosed prick.
Just gave us our team talk for tomorrow nightWanker.
Or instead of Phil Jones, Alex Scott aye!?Not a bad shout...but how about we save a few million and just promote Phil Jones to first team coach with Eni Aluko as the new dof.
He's also ex city/liverpool so I'm sure he just wants to wind us upA real cnut....hates Bayern, he just wants to provoke...
Haha is that the Russian dog scientist Ivan 'Ray' Parlour? I think paul the octopus could run this club better than the humans tbhIt generates clicks. People base their personality around United's failure.
This is Parlour's dog at this point.
See United's bad news > Brain releases dopamine
Excuses galore.
Excuses galore.
Excuses galore.
Considering what we paid for the players and their wages, they should be doing better.Excuses? We can make a whole team from injured players we have ffs. Some teams fall apart when only missing a few players, we miss tons.
https://x.com/UtdDistrict/status/1704235595805925427?s=20
I think this shows the team and players are behind him. Equally, it could be the players are against the general running of the club, particularly, the owners.
https://x.com/UtdDistrict/status/1704235595805925427?s=20
I think this shows the team and players are behind him. Equally, it could be the players are against the general running of the club, particularly, the owners.
When have managers done this?My issue is I have seen better managers after games admit they got it wrong but this guy is always on about we didn't follow the plan, the principles
So for him to be now talking about injuries naa, all am hearing are excuses.
It's got to the point where nothing new comes from him in pressers, before the game it's we are ready to fight we are prepared and then after we lose he blames the players.
Excuses galore.
Except the middle of last season when he started the same 11 (give or take) about 20 times in succession, leading to an unexpected injury crisis that has yet to abate.
If you haven't heard a manager admit in post game interviews that they got it wrong then suit yourselfWhen have managers done this?
Show me?If you haven't heard a manager admit in post game interviews that they got it wrong then suit yourself
Even Pep has
Yeah I don’t really remember Pep saying anything like thisShow me?
This isn't directly related to McTominay in terms of performance, but did anybody find his position strange against Brighton? Since signing Amrabat we've been expecting him to become a double pivot option with Casemiro. And at the weekend we all thought that's how McTominay would be deployed to try to provide a more solid shape to build from.
Instead he's in no man's land, too high up the pitch to defend but not high enough to press. He was literally useless due mainly to his position. I've no idea why he felt this diamond would work and what McTominay would offer in those spaces.
Where this concerns me is it makes me question how we'll use Amrabat. Or perhaps more importantly, Casemiro. We thought ETH would back down from his one 6 and two 8s idea, but he said that Amrabat can play behind Casemiro! Given everything we've seen so far, I think he's being genuine and that he'll push Casemiro further up the pitch. I don't know if this got discussed at the time but it seems bonkers to me. You'll have a natural DM playing as more of an 8, and an 8ish type player with limited defensive ability, playing as a 6. Throw the Mount conundrum in there and I can only see further tactical headaches.
My issue is I have seen better managers after games admit they got it wrong but this guy is always on about we didn't follow the plan, the principles
So for him to be now talking about injuries naa, all am hearing are excuses.
It's got to the point where nothing new comes from him in pressers, before the game it's we are ready to fight we are prepared and then after we lose he blames the players.
He really said that? (Havent seen the presser) Actually, I mean, I get it, better to say that at least something is working than downright stating everything is shit but I'd really would want to know what he really thinks. Not sure how objective I am at this point but this season I haven't seen us play well or good at all. We weren't bad, maybe we were decent but good feels like a bit of stretch. (Doesn't mean, our opponents were always better. I remember the Spurs game and the Arsenal game as well being relatively low level games where no side really was convincing).Yeah. He’s mostly just batted stuff away but he must have sensed the mild hysteria following the recent defeats and, I suppose, found it annoying. Today he was asked a question about re-setting, which annoyed him. He thinks we are playing well in spells but not carrying it through whole matches. I agree with him. He thinks we’ve had some rough luck with injuries. I agree with him. It’s got to be better but he’s speaking honestly.
https://x.com/UtdDistrict/status/1704235595805925427?s=20
I think this shows the team and players are behind him. Equally, it could be the players are against the general running of the club, particularly, the owners.
I think Pep is giving credit where credit is due. Think he did it at least once or twice, remember one after a match against us that we won (after a combatative performance where Peps City team didn't seem to be willing to adjust their usual play to deal better with our counter qualities) and I think, he said something along the lines after a CL defeat, either for Bayern or City. Might be the one where they lost to Spurs when Poch got the better of him or one of the manages for Bayern where he seemed to want to make a point and just lost because he wasn't pragmatic.Yeah I don’t really remember Pep saying anything like this
We all watched the game and saw what happened, the final result is part of the game, the most important part.The funny thing is you can't actually explain why the tactics failed, you just go by the result. Why don't you explain why the tactics didn't work in the Brighton match. It should be easy for a football genius like you.
There are a few videos out there explaining our approach and how well (or not well) it worked and why. McToms un-involvement wasn't just due to the system, it is the player and he managed to be invisible in quite a few different ones. The system/approach itself made sense (extent might be debatable but it isn't 0) and it worked well for 20 minutes and decently for the rest, the issue was that Brighton found a way around our plan and capitalized while we seemingly didn't have an idea to adjust to their adjustments.This isn't directly related to McTominay in terms of performance, but did anybody find his position strange against Brighton? Since signing Amrabat we've been expecting him to become a double pivot option with Casemiro. And at the weekend we all thought that's how McTominay would be deployed to try to provide a more solid shape to build from.
Instead he's in no man's land, too high up the pitch to defend but not high enough to press. He was literally useless due mainly to his position. I've no idea why he felt this diamond would work and what McTominay would offer in those spaces.
Where this concerns me is it makes me question how we'll use Amrabat. Or perhaps more importantly, Casemiro. We thought ETH would back down from his one 6 and two 8s idea, but he said that Amrabat can play behind Casemiro! Given everything we've seen so far, I think he's being genuine and that he'll push Casemiro further up the pitch. I don't know if this got discussed at the time but it seems bonkers to me. You'll have a natural DM playing as more of an 8, and an 8ish type player with limited defensive ability, playing as a 6. Throw the Mount conundrum in there and I can only see further tactical headaches.
Have you interpreted that as Ten Hag making excuses?
The funny thing is you can't actually explain why the tactics failed, you just go by the result. Why don't you explain why the tactics didn't work in the Brighton match. It should be easy for a football genius like you.
My 8 year old nephew could in the same vein discuss astrophysics to death.Do you not know? It was obvious and has been discussed to death.
Id interpret that as the physios not doing their job. Haalands injury problems vanished the moment he joined City