You know what, it's a fair enough point, and I understand a new manager would take time to bed in... so replacing Ole now could be disruptive (and we are 2 points off the top - provided we win our game in hand).
The players you've mentioned there were top drawer to be honest (on paper at least). Who knows what factors were at play for Tottenham? Could it have been the mentality of the club, in that they don't win trophies? Maybe, maybe not.
Anyway enough of guessing what factors were at play, lets explore some of the facts that were actually at play with those Leicester and Chelsea sides...
Leicester 2015/2016
- could be backed at 5,000/1 at the start of the season to win the league
- during the campaign Jamie Vardy scored in a record breaking 11 consecutive league games to break Van Nistelrooy's record of scoring in 10 consecutive league games
Chelsea 2016/2017
- Had a spine of Courtois, Cahill, Fabregas, Hazard, and Costa (the same spine that won them the league in 2014/2015)
Verdict
Pochettino was up against it with Leicester in 2015/2016. Based on the odds of 5,000/1 for Leicester to win the league, Leicester's win can only be described as an absolute anomaly - the likes of which a team with odds that high will very unlikely ever win the league again.
Not only that, but look at Jamie Vardy for Leicester that season compared to Harry Kane for Tottenham...
Vardy: 24 goals in 19 different league games, and 6 assists
Kane: 25 goals in 17 different league games, and 1 assist
A phenomenal season by Kane, but an even better one (team wise) by Vardy.
The Chelsea side of 2016/2017 was full of Premier League winners, they had been there and done it before, and crucially they had the same spine as when they won it in 2014/2015.
Interestingly that season, Tottenham finished 2nd in the league and lost the fewest amount of games (4)
To brush those Leicester and Chelsea sides off like they were cannon fodder is way off the mark. Leicester had a goal and assists machine in the team, and the Chelsea side were full of past winners.
You say that the current Liverpool side without Van Dijk are still 'miles better than Leicester and Chelsea were'
I completely disagree with you on that. Those title winning sides were very, very, good teams.
Pochettino did very well to have challenged for the league in those seasons, and deserves a lot more credit than people give him.